Adapting Shakespeare – Converting Shylock in Michael Radford’s the Merchant of Venice

• Authors: Luke Oakes
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This article aims to explore the extension and evolution of Shakespeare’s The Merchant of Venice through Michael Radford’s 2004 cinematic adaptation. By investigating the concept of adaptation and the significance of intertextuality, Shakespeare’s source text is considered alongside Radford’s twenty-first century recreation to reimagine and redefine the construction of Shylock as both a comic and tragic device utilized across film and play. Issues of racial and religious prejudices alongside anti- Semitic views were particularly prominent in Elizabethan England and, by concentrating on recontextualisation, this article looks to expose Shakespeare’s characterization as a reflective commentary concerning societal discriminations at the time of the play’s performance. By focusing primarily on Shakespeare’s Jewish Usurer, Radford is able to reconstruct and reestablish the dramatic devices and characters within the cinematic version, metaphorically converting Shylock from comic villain to tragic victim. Finally, it argues that this dynamic shift inevitably metamorphoses Shylock from a spectator’s perspective and provides Michael Radford with an opportunity to offer a social commentary on social inequality in the twenty-first century.

Keywords

EN

The Merchant of Venice; adaptation; recontextualisation; intertextuality; Shylock; comic villain; tragic victim

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Messages, Sages and Ages
• Year: 2016
• Volume: 3
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 28-37

Dates

published

2016-08-01

online

2016-08-04

Contributors

author

Luke Oakes

• Halesowen College Whittingham Road, Halesowen West Midlands, B63 3NA, UK

References

• Allen, G. 2011. Intertextuality: The New Critical Idiom. New York: Routledge.
• Bemis, J. Pearce, J. 2009. The Merchant of Venice: With Contemporary Criticism. San Francisco: Ignatius Press.
• Brode, D. 2000. Shakespeare in the Movies: From the Silent Era to Shakespeare in Love. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Crane, C. Cutchins, D. 2010. Adaptation Studies: New Approaches. Madison: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.
• Crowl, S., Burnett, M. and Wray, R. (eds.) 2006. Screening Shakespeare in the Twenty-first Century. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
• Daniel, D. 2006. “William Shakespeare’s The Merchant of Venice.” Film Quarterly vol. 60, no. 1. 52-6. JSTOR. Retrieved 8th June 2016.
• Elliott, K. 2003. Rethinking the Film/Novel Debate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Hapgood, R., and Boose, L. Burt, R. (eds.) 1997. Shakespeare, the Movie: Popularizing the Plays on Film, TV and Video. London: Routledge.
• Hindle, M. 2007. Studying Shakespeare on Film. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Hutcheon, L. 2006. A Theory of Adaptation. New York: Routledge.
• Huttner, J. L. . 2006. “The Merchant of Venice - Interview with Director and Screenwriter Michael Radford.” All about Jewish Theatre, 10th April 2006. www.jewish-theatre.com. Retrieved 8th June 2016.
• Jackson, R. 2007. The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare on Film. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Orgel, S. 2004. Shakespeare and the Mediterranean: The Selected Proceedings of the International Shakespeare Association World Congress. Newark: University of Delaware Press.
• Patterson, S. 1999. “The Bankruptcy of Homoerotic Amity in Shakespeare’s Merchant of Venice.” Shakespeare Quarterly vol. 50, no. 1. 9-32. Literature Online. Retrieved 8th June 2016.
• Pequigney, J. 2004. “The (In)Significance: “What the age might call sodomy” and Homosexuality in Certain Studies of Shakespeare’s Plays.” Intertetxs vol. 8, no. 2. 117-34. Literature Online. Retrieved 8th June 2016.
• Pittman, L. 2007. “Locating the Bard: Adaptation and Authority in Michael Radford’s The Merchant of Venice.” Shakespeare Bulletin vol. 25, no. 2. 13-33. EBSCO Host. Retrieved 8th June 2016.
• Pomeranz, M. 2009. “At the Movies: The Merchant of Venice Interview.” ABC 8th July 2009. www.abc.net.au. Retrieved 8th June 2016.
• Shakespeare, W. 1967. The Merchant of Venice. London: Penguin.
• Shaughnessy, R. 2011. The Routledge Guide to William Shakespeare. New York: Routledge.
• Wertheim, A. 1972. “The Treatment of Shylock and Thematic Integrity in The Merchant of Venice.” Shakespeare Studies vol. 6. 75-87. Literature Online. Retrieved on 8th June 2016.
• William Shakespeare’s The Merchant of Venice. Dir. Michael Radford. 2004. DVD. MGM Home Ent. (Europe) Ltd, 2005.

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/msas-2016-0003