Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


Journal

2015 | 48 | 3 | 188-197

Article title

Systems Approach to Standardisation, Classification and Modelling of Managed Events for Tourism

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
Background and Purpose: The standardisation and classification of managed events provide a legislative basis to distinguish events managed for tourism in their characteristics and quality. The systems approach to standardisation and classification of managed events is a unique, holistic view of event management quality and event organization in tourism. It enables a clear overview of a researched topic and provides adequate support to design and decision-making. In this paper, we explain the meaning of standardisation and classification for Slovenian legislation related to event management. We present the importance of a systems approach methodology for event categorization and classification as it relates to the quality of event management organization, the quality of staff, the quality of the event program and the quality of event services. Objectives: Provide an overview of events in tourism, related definitions and information gathered from scientific authors, which serves as current systems approach principles with which we want to achieve the desired results, positive changes in legislation; in our case-in the field of managed event quality for tourism through standardisation and classification of events on the national level in Slovenia. Method: A descriptive method and systems approach methods are fundamental methodological principles in our analysis. In the context of a systems approach, we used qualitative modelling and constructed causal loop models (CLD) of the legislative system of events and investments in the events. We also used context-dependent modelling (SD model) in a frame of systems dynamics. Results: We present the most appropriate solution to eliminate our problem or question about how to achieve high quality and unique events within event tourism and with event management, thereby creating added value to an event legislative system. We explain suggestions for achieving triple-bottom elements through well-designed quality standards and classification of events, which leads to an optimal categorization of events. Conclusion: From a systems point of view, event tourism processes, including event management, are systems consisting of people and technologies with the purpose of designing, producing, trading and deploying the idea of an event. It is necessary to transform the current Slovenian legislative system of events and prepare a document which standardizes and classifies events based on systems approach methodology.

Publisher

Journal

Year

Volume

48

Issue

3

Pages

188-197

Physical description

Dates

published
2015-08-01
received
2015-04-06
revised
2015-05-22
accepted
2015-06-20
online
2015-08-14

Contributors

  • University of Primorska, Faculty of Tourism Studies Portorož – TURISTICA, Obala 11a, SI - 6320 Portorož
  • Šentvid pri Grobelnem 29a, SI- 3231 Grobelno

References

  • Baggio, R. (2013). Studying complex tourism systems: a novel approach based on networks derived from a time series. Paper presented at XIV April International Academic Conference on Economic and Social Development Moscow, April 2-5, 2013.
  • Camus, S., Hikkerova, L., & Sahut, J. M. (2012). Systemic analysis and model of sustainable tourism. International Journal of Business, 17(4), 365.
  • Checkland, P. (2000). Soft systems methodology: A thirty- year retrospective. Systems Research and Behavioral Science Syst. Res. 17, S11-S58.
  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper Perennial.
  • Cvikl, H. (2008) Podlage za posodobitev sistema kategorizacije nastanitvenih obratov v Sloveniji [The Basis for Updating Accommodation Facilities Classification System]. Academica Turistica, 1(3-4), 10-16.
  • Fatur, P., & Likar, B. (2009). Ustvarjalnost zaposlenih za inovativnost podjetja: sistemski vidik managementa idej kot gradnika uspešne organizacije [Building an Innovative Enterprise through the Creativity of its People]. Koper; Univerza na Primorskem, Fakulteta za management Koper.
  • Getz, D. (1986). Models in tourism planning: Towards integration of theory and practice. Tourism Management, 7 (1), 21-32, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0261-5177(86)90054-3
  • Getz, D. (1997). Event management and event tourism. New York: Cognizant Communication Corporation.
  • Getz, D. (2010a). Event studies: Trends and forces in education and research. Presented at Queen Margaret University, UK.
  • Getz, D. (2010b). The nature and scope of festival studies. International Journal of Event Management Research, 5(1). Retrieved from http://www.ijemr.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Getz.pdf
  • Getz, D. (2012). Event studies: Theory, research and policy for planned events. London: Routledge.
  • Golob, A. (2011). Sistemski pristop k oblikovanju akta o Standardizaciji in klasifikaciji prireditev: [Systems Approach Approach to Act on Standardization and Classifications of Events]. Portorož: University of Primorska, Faculty of Tourism Studies - Turistica.
  • Jere Jakulin, T. (2004). Hotel animation in light of the event management in tourism. In: Ambrož, Milan (Ed.). Strateška partnerstva za razvoj turističnih destinacij: mednarodna konferenca: zbornik povzetkov : International Conference : Book of Abstracts. Portorož : University of Primorska, Faculty of Tourism Studies, p. 56.
  • Jere Jakulin, T. (2009). Sistemski pristop in modeliranje kot metodi za oblikovanje strateških odločitev v turizmu [Systems Approach and Modelling as Methods for Strategic Decision-Making in Tourism]. JAK RS. Portorož: University of Primorska, Faculty of Tourism Studies.
  • Kljajić, M. (1994). Teorija sistemov [Systems theory]. Kranj: Moderna organizacija.
  • Kljajić, M., & Jakulin, J. T. (2005). Systems approach to complex systems modelling. Acta Systemica, 5(1), p. 1-6.
  • Leiper, N. (1990). Tourist attraction systems. Annals of Tourism Research, 17, 367-84.
  • Maturana H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1998). Drevo spoznanja [The Tree of Knowledge]. Ljubljana: Studia humanitatis.
  • Meadows D. & Ison, R. (2010) System in Systems Practice: How to Act in a Climate Change World, London: Springer.
  • Nguyen, N. C., Bosch, O. J. H., & Maani, E. K. (2011). Creating “learning laboratories” for sustainable development in biospheres: a systems thinking approach. Systems Research and Behavioural Science, 28(1) 51-62, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sres.1044
  • O’Hagan, J., & Harvey, D. (2000). Why do companies sponsor art events? Some evidence and a proposed classification. Journal of Cultural Economics, 24(3), 205-224.
  • McDonald, R. J. (2009). Complexity science: an alternative worldview for understanding sustainable tourism development. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 17(4), 455-471, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09669580802495709
  • Meriam Webster Dictionary (18.5.2015) http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/classification
  • Ropret, M., Jere Jakulin, T. & Likar, B. (2014). The systems approach to the improvement of innovation in Slovenian tourism. Kybernetes, 43(3/4), 427-444.
  • Sterman, J.D. (2000). Business dynamics: systems approach and modelling for complex world. Boston: Irwin McGraw Hill.
  • Stubelj Ars, M., & Bohanec, M. (2010). Towards the ecotourism: A decision support model for the assessment of sustainability of mountain huts in the Alps. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(12), 2554-2564.
  • Ministrstvo za gospodarske dejavnosti SRST 2012-2016 Strategija razvoja turizma Slovenije 2012-2016 [Slovenian Tourism Development Strategy]. Republika Slovenija, Vlada republike Slovenije.
  • Ţară-Lungă, M.O. (2012). Major Special Events: An Interpretative Literature Review, Management & Marketing Challenges for the Knowledge Society, 7(4), 759-776.
  • Vodeb, K. (2010). Turistična destinacija kot sistem [Tourism Destination as a System]. Portorož: University of Primorska, Faculty of Tourism Studies.
  • Young, D., & Burlingame, D. (1996) Paradigm lost: Research toward a new understanding of corporate philanthropy. In Burlingame & Young (Ed.), Corporate Philanthropy at the Crossroads (pp. 158-176). Indiana University Press.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.doi-10_1515_orga-2015-0016
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.