Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2015 | 15 | 1 | 71-88

Article title

Well-being in the Czech Republic in an Aggregate Perspective

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
The article assesses well-being in the Czech Republic compared to other Visegrad countries (Slovakia, Hungary, Poland) and neighbouring Germany and Austria. By employing various approaches designed by several international organisations it takes an aggregate perspective to assess both the current well-being and its sustainability into the future. All employed indicators that relate to current well-being evaluate the well-being in the Czech Republic as moderate among the OECD countries. The results indicate that the position in well-being rankings improves with the growing number of dimensions or subjective factors included in the well-being measure, mainly due to the reduction in relative importance of income dimension and higher emphasis on the multidimensionality and complexity of well-being. In the case of sustainability, large differences can be identified in evaluation stemming from Happy Planet Index and Sustainable Society Index perspective. Although both of them agree on unfavourable situation as regards environmental sustainability in the Czech Republic, different accent on economic area alters the final result substantially. The analysis shows that for any well-being assessment, the choice of indicators is crucial and a large portion of caution is necessary when interpreting these.

Publisher

Year

Volume

15

Issue

1

Pages

71-88

Physical description

Dates

published
2015-03-01
online
2015-04-18

Contributors

  • Institute of Sociology of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic
author
  • Institute of Sociology of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic: Pavel Štika

References

  • ABDALLAH, S., MICHAELSON, J., SHAH, S., STOLL, L., MARKS, N. (2012). The Happy Planet Index: 2012 Report. A global index of sustainable well-being. London: NEF.
  • BARTOLINI, S., MIKUCKA, M., SARRACINO, F. (2012). Money, Trust and Happiness in Transition Countries: Evidence from Time Series. Working Paper No. 2012-4, Luxembourg: CEPS/INSTEAD.
  • BOARINI, R., D'ERCOLE, M. M. (2013). Going beyond GDP: An OECD Perspective. Fiscal Studies. 34. Pp. 289-314.
  • BOARINI, R., COHEN, G., DENIS, V., RUIZ, N. (2011). Designing Your Better Life Index: methodology and results. Statistics Directorate Working Paper. Paris: OECD.
  • BOARINI, R. et al. (2012). What Makes for a Better Life?: The Determinants of Subjective Well-Being in OECD Countries - Evidence from the Gallup World Poll. OECD Statistics Working Papers, 2012/03. OECD Publishing.
  • DECANCQ, K., VAN OOTEGEM, L., VERHOFSTADT, E. (2013). What If We Voted on the Weights of a Multidimensional Well-Being Index? An Illustration with Flemish Data. Fiscal Studies. 34. Pp. 315-332.[WoS]
  • DI TELLA, R., MACCULLOCH, R. (2006). Some uses of happiness data in economics. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1). Pp. 25-46.[Crossref]
  • EASTERLIN, R. A. (1974). Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? Some Empirical Evidence. In David, P., Reder, M. (ed.). Nations and Household in Economic growth: essays in Honor of Moses Abramovitz. New York: Academic press.
  • EASTERLIN, R. A. (2009). Lost in Transition: Life Satisfaction on the Road to Capitalism. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 71(1). Pp. 130-145.
  • EC. (2009). GDP and Beyond. Measuring Progress in a Changing World. Commission of the European Communities COM(2009) 433.
  • EUROSTAT. (2011). Sustainable Development in the European Union - 2011 Monitoring Report of the EU Sustainable Development Strategy. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  • FLECHE, S., SMITH, C., SORSA, P. (2012). Exploring Determinants of Subjective Wellbeing in OECD Countries: Evidence from the World Value Survey. OECD Statistics Working Papers, 2012/01. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • HAGERTY, M. R., LAND, K. C. (2007). Constructing summary indices of quality of life: a model for the effect of heterogeneous importance weights. Sociological Methods and Research. 35. Pp. 455-96.
  • HÁK, T., JANOUŠKOVÁ, S. (2013). “Beyond GDP” Indicators in the Czech Republic. Statistika. 93(2). Pp. 86-99.
  • HAMPLOVÁ, D. (2004). Životní spokojenost: rodina, práce a další faktory. Sociologická studie 04(06). Praha: SOÚ AV CR.
  • HELLIWELL, J.F. et al. (2009). International Evidence on the social context of Well Being. NBER Working Papers, 14720, National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • KAHNEMAN, D., Deaton, A. (2010), High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 107. Pp. 16489-93.
  • MACKERRON, G. (2011). Happiness economics from 35,000 feet. Journal of Economic Surveys. 26(4). Pp.705 - 735.[WoS]
  • OECD. (2009). Society at a Glance 2009: OECD Social Indicators. OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/soc_glance-2008-en.[Crossref]
  • OECD. (2011). How’s Life? Measuring Well-Being. OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264121164-en.[Crossref]
  • OECD. (2013). How’s Life? 2013: Measuring Well-Being. OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264201392-en.[Crossref]
  • SELEZNEVA, E. (2011). Surveying transitional experience and subjective well-being: Income, work and family. Economic Systems. 35(2). Pp. 139-157.
  • SACKS, D. W., STEVENSON, B., WOLFERS, J. (2010). Subjective well-being, income, economic development and growth. NBER Working Paper no. 16441.
  • SIROVÁTKA, T., SAXONBERG, S. (2011). Life Satisfaction and Happiness in the Czech Republic. In: Greve, B. (ed.) Happiness and Social Policy in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Pp. 11-30.
  • STIGLITZ, J. E., SEN, A., FITOUSSI, J.P. (2008). Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. Retrieved December 12, 2013, from http://www.stiglitz-senfitoussi.fr/documents/rapport_anglais.pdf.
  • Štika, P. (2009). Ekonomie a štestí. Politická ekonomie. 57(2). Pp. 250-262. VAN DE KERK, G., MANUEL, A.R. (2008). A comprehensive index for a sustainable society: The SSI - the Sustainable Society Index. Ecological Economics. 66(2-3). Pp. 228-242.
  • VECERNÍK, J. (2012). Subjektivní indikátory blahobytu: prístupy, merení a data. Politická ekonomie. 60(3). Pp. 291-308.
  • VECERNÍK, J., MYSÍKOVÁ, M. (2014a). Subjektivní blahobyt v Ceské republice a strední Evrope: makro- a mikro-determinanty. Politická ekonomie. 61(2). Pp. 249-269.
  • VECERNÍK, J., MYSÍKOVÁ, M. (2014b). (Un)happy transition? Subjective Wellbeing in European Countries in 1991-2008 and Beyond. WIFO Working Paper, No. 467

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.doi-10_1515_revecp-2015-0012
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.