Comparative Analysis Of Pedagogical Technologies In The Context Of Future Agrarians’ Multicultural Education In The USA

• Authors: Ruslan Kravets
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

In the article the comparative analysis of pedagogical technologies in the USA has been carried out in the context of future agrarians’ multicultural education. The essence of traditional and innovative pedagogical technologies and the peculiarities of their realization at higher educational establishments have been viewed. The expediency of developing the pedagogical technology of forming future agrarians’ multicultural competence has been reasoned. The classification of pedagogical technologies has been presented according to the level of application; the philosophical basis; the scientific conception of mastering the experience; the orientation on personality’s structures; the nature of modernisation of the traditional teaching system. The possibility of their determination is also considered due to the aims and tasks, the organizational forms, the dominant methods of teaching, the approaches to the personality, the category of students, the type of cognitive activity’s organization and management. The special attention is paid to two directions of the education’s development – traditional and innovative. The educational process in the American post-industrial, inform society and its attributive characteristics are substantially determined by a personality factor, and pushing off from this, the value of personality must serve as an initial moment in organizing the system of higher professional education. The practical aspects of implementing the traditional pedagogical technology, the technology of developing teaching, the programmable teaching technology, the problem-solving teaching technology, the module teaching technology, the concentrated teaching technology and the distance teaching technology are viewed.

Keywords

EN

pedagogical technology; professional training; future agrarians; traditional teaching; module; democratization; personality-orientated approach; methodical classification

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Comparative Professional Pedagogy
• Year: 2015
• Volume: 5
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 68-73

Dates

published

2015-06-01

online

2015-06-23

Contributors

author

Ruslan Kravets

• Vinnytsia National Agrarian University, 3 Soniachna St., Vinnytsia, 21008, Ukraine

References

• 1. Attwell, G., Hughes, J. (2010). Pedagogic Approaches to Using Technology for Learning. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass, p. 86.
• 2. Baltazar, L. (1990). Modules: A strategy in teaching. Quezon City : Rex Printing Company, Inc., p. 98.
• 3. Banks, F. (2013). Teaching Technology. New York : Routledge, p. 264.
• 4. Bates, A. (2005). Technology, e-learning and distance education. New York : Routledge, p. 246.
• 5. Dudeney, G. (2007). The Internet and the language classroom. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, p. 286.
• 6. Hennessy, S., McCormick, R. (2013). The general problem-solving process in technology education. In: Banks, F. Teaching Technology. New York : Routledge, p. 95–108.
• 7. Motteram, G. (2013). Innovations in learning technologies for English language teaching. London : British Council, p. 198.[WoS]
• 8. Nicholls, G. (2002). Developing Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. New Jersey : Psychology Press, p. 196.
• 9. Noga, K., Radnovski, M. (2008). Innovative Techniques in Instruction Technology, E-learning, E-assessment, and Education. Boston : Springer, p. 274.
• 10. Ropo, E. (1993). Studying Technology: An Investigation of Approaches to Studying and Perceptions of Teaching in a Finnish University of Technology. Higher Education, Volume 25, No. 2, p. 111–132.[Crossref]
• 11. Stewart, J., Wilkerson, V. (1999). A guide to teaching with modules. Washington : Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers Inc., p. 40.
• 12. The National Doctrine of Education Development of Ukraine in the XXI Century. (2002). Education, No. 26, p. 2–4.
• 13. Выготський, Л. (1991). Педагогическая психология [Pedagogical psychology]. Москва : Педагогика, p. 480 (in Russian).
• 14. Занков, Л. (1999). Избранные педагогические труды [Selected Pedagogical Works]. Москва : Дом педагогики, p. 608 (in Russian).

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/rpp-2015-0042