Metaphoric Confinement of Information

• Authors: Marek Hetmański
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The aim of the paper is to determine how metaphors tackle the probable nature of information and uncertainty in the structure of the communication process. Since the cognitive theory of conceptual metaphors holds that metaphoric thinking and doing are unavoidable, they are employed often in explaining the communicating domains. The metaphorical conceptualizing is recognized in Shannon and Weaver’s Mathematical Theory of Communication where such abstract concepts as freedom of choice, choosing probabilities (possibilities), and uncertainty ware conceived in that way. It is described in accord with Reddy’s conduit metaphor and Ritchie’s toolmakers paradigm. In the paper the issue of both the advantages and disadvantages of metaphors is considered: mainly, how they can explain and predict ways in which people communicate their expectations or uncertainties as well as, more practically, how the probable/informational metaphors enable the management of knowledge in libraries or databases.

Keywords

EN

metaphor; information; probability; uncertainty; cognitive theory of metaphor; theory of communication

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric
• Year: 2015
• Volume: 40
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 161-178

Dates

published

2015-03-01

online

2015-04-10

Contributors

author

Marek Hetmański

• Marie Curie-Skłodowska University, Lublin

References

• Gibbs, R.W. (Ed.) (2008). The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Gigerenzer, G. (2007). Gut feelings: The intelligence of the unconscious. London: Penguin Group.
• Kövecses, Z. (2006). Language, mind and culture: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Lakoff, J., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago - London: The University of Chicago Press.
• Lakoff, J., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.
• Marras, C. (2013). Structuring multidisciplinary knowledge: Aquatic and terrestrial metaphors. Knowledge Organization, 40(6), 392-399.
• Ortony, A. (Ed.) (1993). Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Reddy, M. (1993), The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 164-201). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Ritchie, D. (2003). Statistical probability as a metaphor for epistemological probability. Metaphor and Symbol, 18(1), 1-12.[Crossref]
• Ritchie, D. (2013). Metaphor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Shannon, C., & Weaver, W. (1948/1964). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: The University of Illinois Press.
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974/1998). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. In A. Tversky & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 3-28). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/slgr-2015-0009