A Study of Telemedical Applications Based on User Experience

• Authors: Joanna Rybka , Małgorzata Plechawska-Wójcik , Tomasz Tokarek
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The popularity of telemedical applications has been increasing noticeably in recent years. Easy access to a variety of software products makes contemporary users concentrate not only on functionalities but also on the design of the Graphical User Interface (GUI) – its usefulness, ease of use, and intuitiveness. The objective of this study was to evaluate the GUI quality of selected telemedical applications dedicated to depressed patients and doctors providing medical care for this group of patients. Another aim of the paper was to propose and check assessment criteria applied to the evaluation experiment. To achieve this objective, the case study was based on two methods: expert analysis and cognitive walkthrough. The expert analysis study was conducted on three groups of users: user experience specialists, patients, and clinicians. Although the expert analysis method is usually dedicated to GUI design specialists, in this study, we also applied it to patient and physician groups. The results showed that there were no statistical differences between assessments carried out by those three groups of users. Applied testing criteria were revised with Nielsen’s heuristics. The proposed criteria helped to uncover many usability problems in several different areas during user tests. Further studies might be performed in order to strengthen accuracy and for completion of the proposed expert analysis evaluation criteria. However, our results show that the criteria we used seem to be robust enough to apply to both expert and end-user evaluations. Furthermore, multiple evaluation based on two different methods presented with better results, allowing not only problem identification but also verification.

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric
• Year: 2015
• Volume: 43
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 195-210

Dates

published

2015-12-01

online

2016-01-06

Contributors

author

Joanna Rybka

• Department of Public Health, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
• Research Center for Entrepreneurship and Innovation, Hasselt University, Belgium

author

Małgorzata Plechawska-Wójcik

• Institute of Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology, Poland

author

Tomasz Tokarek

• Department of Pathomorphology, Student’s Pathomorphology Group, Jagiellonian University in Kraków, Collegium Medicum, Poland

References

• Ackerman, M., Craft, R., Ferrante, F., Kratz, M., Mandil, S., & Sapci, H. (2012). Telemedicine technology. Telemedicine Journal and e-Health, 8(1), 71–78.
• Allen, J., & Chudley, J. (2012). Smashing UX Design: Foundations for Designing Online User Experiences. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K.: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
• American Telemedicine Association. (2013). What is Telemedicine? Retrieved from
• Blomkvist, S. (2005). Towards a Model for Bridging Agile Development and User-Centered Design. Human-Centered Software Engineering – Integrating Usability in the Software Development Lifecycle. Human-Computer Interaction Series, 8(IV), 219–244.
• Chamberlain, S., Sharp, H., & Maiden, N. (2006). Towards a Framework for Integrating Agile Development and User-Centered Design. Extreme Programming and Agile Processes in Software Engineering. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4044, 143–153.
• Dayton, D., & Barnum, C. (2009). The Impact of Agile on User-centered Design: Two Surveys Tell the Story. Technical Communication, 56(3), 219–234.
• Detweiler, M. (2007). Managing UCD Within Agile Projects. Interactions, 14(3), 40–42.
• Dhir, A., & Al-Kahtani, M. (2013). A Case Study on User Experience (UX) Evaluation of Mobile Augmented Reality Prototypes. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 19(8), 1175–1196.
• Dillon, A., & Song, M. (1997). An empirical comparison of the usability for novice and expert searchers of a textual and a graphic interface to an art-resource database. Journal of Digital Information, 1(1), 619–638.
• Hertz, B. T. (2015). Telemedicine – patient demand, cost containment drive growth. Retrieved from
• InMedica Report. (2012). The World Market for Telehealth – An Analysis of Demand Dynamics. Retrieved from
• Isomursu, M., Sirotkin, A., Voltti, P., & Halonen, M. (2012). User Experience Design Goes Agile in Lean Transformation – A Case Study. Agile Conference (AGILE), IEEE, 1–10.
• Jochen, P. (1991). Errors in computerized office work: Difference between novice and expert users. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, 23(2), 63–66.
• Koch, S. (2006). Home telehealth-current state and future trends. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 75(8), 565–576.
• Koyani, S. J., Bailey, R., & Nall, J. R. (2004). Research-Based Web Design & Usability Guidelines. Washington, DC, U. S.: National Institutes of Health.
• Krug, S. (2000). Don’t Make Me Think! A Common Sense Approach to Web Usability. New York: Que.
• Laskowski, M. (2012). Proposals for application interface testing methods. Informatyka Automatyka Pomiary w Gospodarce i Ochronie Środowiska, 4b, 21–24 (in Polish).
• Mathis, L. (2011). Designed for Use. Dallas: The Pragmatic Bookshelft.
• Nielsen, J., & Molich, R. (1990). Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Empowering people, ACM, New York, USA, 249–256.
• Pan, J. (1999). Software Testing. Retrieved from
• Phung, Q. (2007). Identifying Usability Problems in relation to User Experience with System and Tests. Retrieved from
• Plechawska-Wójcik, M. (2014). Heuristic evaluation and user experience assessment of online shopping portals using cognitive walkthrough and expert method. MakeLearn 2014: Human Capital without Borders; Knowledge and Learning for Quality of Life. Proceedings of the Management, Knowledge and Learning International Conference (pp. 467–475).
• Prenzel, A., & Ringwelski, G. (2012). Design of Human-computer Interfaces in Scheduling Applications. Proceedings of ICEIS Conference, 219–228.
• Resmini, A., & Rosati, L. (2011). Pervasive Information Architecture: Designing Cross-Channel User Experiences. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
• Rubin, J., & Chisnell, D. (2008). Handbook of Usability Testing, Second Edition: How to Plan, Design, and Conduct Effective Tests. Indianapolis: Wiley Publishing Inc.
• Sauro, J. (2011). What’s The Difference Between A Heuristic Evaluation And A Cognitive Walkthrough? Measuring Usability. Retrieved from
• Shneiderman, B. (1998). Designing the user interface. Boston, MA, USA: Addison-Wesley Longman.
• Video Conferencing Advice. (2015). Overview of Major Telemedicine Solutions. Retrieved from
• Wharton, C., Rieman, J., Lewis, C., & Polson, P. (1994). The cognitive walkthrough method: A practitioner’s guide. In J. Nielsen, & R. L. Mack (Eds.). Usability inspection methods. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/slgr-2015-0050