Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2015 | 43 | 1 | 229-243

Article title

The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D): Is It Suitable for Use with Older Adults?

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
With the aim of verifying the suitability of the CES-D scale for use in long-term care institutions for older adults, the CES-D questionnaire was used to collect patient-reported assessments, and two well-known psychometric instruments – the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Barthel Index of Abilities of Daily Living – were used to collect nurse-reported assessments, based on observations of patients’ behaviours. With regard to possible frequent cases of cognitive impairment and/or insufficient motivation to give sensible responses to CES-D questions, the patient-reported responses were collected from patients during one-on-one sessions with a nurse. The reliability, concurrent validity, and the trustworthiness of the obtained data were supported with proper values of the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, 0.70 < alpha < 0.85, with significant correlation between CES-D and HADS-Depression, R = 0.50, p < 0.001, and with significant correlation between scores of particular CES-D items vs. final CES-D evaluations of depression, proved by significance p < 0.001 for 18 of 20 CES-D items. These findings supported the effectiveness of the one-on-one session methodology in questionnaire surveys for older adults. The postulation that cases of self-reported depression included somewhat different information about the patient than nurse-reported depression concerning the same patient was supported with the evidence that, in spite of the significant correlation between the Barthel Index and HADS-Depression, R = −0.17, p = 0.016, and in spite of the significant correlation between CES-D and HADS-Depression, the correlation between the Barthel Index and CES-D, equal to R = −0.08 was insignificant at p = 0.244. The findings of this study, considered jointly, support the valuableness of the CES-D scale for use in one-on-one surveys for older adults.

Keywords

Publisher

Year

Volume

43

Issue

1

Pages

229-243

Physical description

Dates

published
2015-12-01
online
2016-01-06

Contributors

  • Department of Epidemiology and Population Research, Jagiellonian University in Kraków, Poland
  • Department of Medical and Environmental Nursing, Jagiellonian University in Kraków, Poland

References

  • Berlowitz, D. R., Du, W., Kazis, L., & Lewis, S. (1995). Health-related quality of life in nursing home residents: Differences in patient and provider perceptions. Journal of the American Geriatric Society, 43(7), 799–802.
  • Berry, J. A. (2009). Nurse Practitioner/Patient Communication Styles in Clinical Practice. Journal for Nurse Practitioners, 5(7), 508–515.[Crossref]
  • Bjelland, I., Dahl, A. A., Haug, T. T., & Neckelmann, D. (2002). The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. An updated literature review. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 52(2), 69–77.[Crossref]
  • Botek, A. M. (2015). “Elderspeak” Can Damage an Older Adult’s Health. Retrieved from
  • Burgio, L. D., Allen–Burge, R., Roth, D. L., Bourgeois, M. S., Dijkstra, K., Gerstle, J., Jackson E., et al. (2001). Come Talk With Me. Improving Communication Between Nursing Assistants and Nursing Home Residents During Care Routines. The Gerontologist, 41(4), 449–460.[Crossref]
  • Chmiel, I., & Górkiewicz, M. (2010). The scope of acceptance by patients motherly and friendly style of nurse’s supporting behaviour in palliative care. Problemy Pielęgniarstwa, 18(4), 399–405.
  • Chmiel, I., & Górkiewicz, M. (2012). How much credible are the responses obtained from an individual respondent in a non-repeated questionnaire survey: looking for practical methods with a statistical support. Studies in Logic Grammar and Rhetoric. Logical, Statistical and Computer Methods in Medicine, 29(42), 55–73.
  • Collins, D. (2003). Pretesting survey instruments: An overview of cognitive methods. Quality of Life Research, 12(3), 229–238.
  • Counselling Resource Research Staff. (2012). A Screening Test for Depression. Retrieved from
  • Dijkstra, W. (2002). Transcribing, Coding, and Analysing Verbal Interactions in Survey Interviews. In D. W. Maynard, H. Houtkoop-Steenstra, N. C. Schaefer, & J. Zouven (Eds.), Standardization and Tacit Knowledge: Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview (pp. 401–425). New York: Wiley.
  • Dojka, E., Górkiewicz, M., & Pająk, A. (2003). Psychometric value of CES-D scale for the assessment of depression in Polish population. Psychiatria Polska, 37(2), 281–292.
  • Donahue, M. O., Piazza, I. M., Griffin, M. Q., Dykes, P. C., & Fitzpatrick, J. J. (2008). The relationship between nurses’ perceptions of empowerment and patient satisfaction. Applied Nursing Research, 21(1), 2–7.[WoS][Crossref]
  • Engström, M., Ljunggren, B., Lindqvist, R., & Carlsson, M. (2006). Staff satisfaction with work, perceived quality of care and stress in elderly care: psychometric assessments and associations. Journal of Nursing Management, 14(4), 318–328.
  • Fiori, K. L., Antonucci, T. C., & Cortina, K. S. (2006). Social Network Typologies and Mental Health Among Older Adults. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 61B(1), 25–32.[WoS]
  • Gerrie, M. P., Belcher, L. E., & Garry, M. (2006). Mind the gap: false memories for missing aspects of an event. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(5), 689–696.[Crossref]
  • Górkiewicz, M. (2014). Using the Center of Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) to Classify Participants of a Questionnaire Survey with Regard to Their Individual Inclination to Respond at Random. Studies in Logic Grammar and Rhetoric. Logical, Statistical and Computer Methods in Medicine, 39(52), 89–104.
  • Górkiewicz, M., Ciszek, E., & Szczygieł, A. (2005). Ocenianie kompetencji eksperta na podstawie procedury powtórnego rozmieszczania. In Z. J. Brzeziński (Ed), Horyzonty Metodyczne w Epidemiologii (pp. 125–129). Warszawa, Komisja Epidemiologii i Zdrowia Publicznego PAN.
  • Górkiewicz, M., & Kołacz, J. (2001). Statystyka Medyczna. Podejście praktyczne przy zastosowaniu programu MS Excel. Krakow, Poland: WUJ.
  • Gutysz-Wojnicka, A., & Dyk, D. (2007). Adaptacja polskiej wersji The Newcastle Satisfaction with Nursing Scale (NSNS). Problemy Pielęgniarstwa, 15(2–3), 133–138.
  • Hayes, V., Morris J., Wolfe, C., & Morgan, M. (1995). The SF-36 health survey questionnaire: is it suitable for use with older adults? Age and Ageing, 24(2), 120–125.
  • Knapp, H. (2007). Therapeutic Communication. Developing Professional Skills. London, UK: SAGE Publications.
  • Kuźmicz, I, Brzostek, T, & Górkiewicz, M. (2008). Barthel questionnaire as measurement tool for physical independence of older adults. Medical Studies, 12, 17–21.
  • Levy-Storms, L. (2008). Therapeutic communication training in long-term care institutions: Recommendations for future research. Patient Education and Counseling, 73(1), 8–21.[WoS][Crossref]
  • Lowry, R. (2011). Vassar Stats: Website for Statistical Computation. Retrieved from
  • McCormack, B. (2004). Person-centeredness in gerontological nursing: an overview of the literature. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 13(S1), 31–38.[Crossref]
  • Meisner, B. A. (2012). A Meta-Analysis of Positive and Negative Age Stereotype Priming Effects on Behavior Among Older Adults. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 67B(1), 13–17.[WoS]
  • Mozley, C. G., Huxley, P., Sutcliffe, C., Bagley, H., Burns, A., Challis, D., & Cordingley, L. (1999). “Not knowing where I am doesn’t mean I don’t know what I like”: Cognitive impairment and quality of life responses in elderly people. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 14(9), 776–783.[Crossref]
  • Park, N. S., Jang, Z., Lee, B. S., Ko, J. E., & Chiriboga, D. A. (2014). The Impact of Social Resources on Depressive Symptoms in Racially and Ethnically Diverse Older Adults: Variations by Groups With Differing Health Risks. Research on Aging, 36(3), 322–342.[WoS][Crossref]
  • Peña–Sánchez, J. N., Domagała, A., Górkiewicz, M., Targowska, M., & Oleszczyk, M. (2011). Adapting a tool in Poland for the measurement of the physicians’ career satisfaction. Family Medicine Topics, 12(1), 58–65.
  • Ready, R. E., Ott, B. R., & Grace, J. (2004). Patient versus informant perspectives of quality of life in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 19(3), 256–265.[Crossref]
  • Rothwell, P. M., McDowell, Z., Wong, C. K., & Dorman, P. J. (1997). Doctors and patients don’t agree: cross sectional study of patients’ and doctors’ perceptions and assessments of disability in multiple sclerosis. British Medical Journal, 314(7094), 1580–1583.
  • Shinkfield, G., & Ogloff, J. (2015). Use and interpretation of routine outcome measures in forensic mental health. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 24(1), 11–18.[WoS][Crossref]
  • Student Nurse Journey. (2012). Therapeutic Communication Techniques – to encourage the expression of feelings and ideas. (vs.) Non-therapeutic Communication Techniques – “Blocks” to communication of feelings and ideas. Retrieved from
  • Trummer, U. F., Mueller, U. O., Nowak, P., Stidl, T., & Pelikan, J. M. (2006). Does physician-patient communication that aims at empowering patients improve clinical outcome?: A case study. Patient Education and Counseling, 61(2), 299–306.[Crossref]
  • Williams, K., Kemper, S., & Hummert, M. L. (2004). Enhancing communication with older adults: overcoming elderspeak. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 30(10), 17–25.[Crossref]

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.doi-10_1515_slgr-2015-0052
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.