New Zealand Elite Perceptions on the EU: A Longitudinal Analysis

• Authors: Serena Kelly
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Since the end of the cold war, the European Union’s (EU’s) global aspirations and capabilities have grown. This shift has seen the EU becoming an increasingly integral part of the international arena, both economically and politically. However, there has been a notable geopolitical shift in recent years towards the growing importance of Asia. New Zealand, geographically distant but traditionally culturally aligned with the EU, the nation that has traditionally enjoyed close economic, political and social relations with the EU but is increasingly focused on Asia, presents a unique perspective on this perceived realignment of power. This paper offers a unique perspective on the effectiveness of the EU’s international outreach. Using international relations’ ‘small state theory’ as an analytical tool, the paper draws on a series of longitudinal elite interviews conducted with New Zealand’s political, economic, civil society and media elites over a decade. The paper qualitatively and quantitatively assesses whether the EU remains perceived as a relevant, important global actor in the eyes of New Zealand’s elite. The paper makes a number of observations. Firstly, as a small state, New Zealand’s foreign policy focus has tended to be preoccupied with economics and this preoccupation has meant a notable shift away from Europe. Second, although over the course of the interviews negative discussions about the EU’s Common Agriculture Policy decreased, on the other hand there was increasingly less discussion about the EU’s potential and a more concerted discussion about the importance of Asia to the New Zealand’s economy and future. There are a number of reasons to account for this changing perception towards the EU,however, the internal friction currently facing the European Union and eurozone was consistently noted. Finally, although over time the interviewed elites believed that the EU’s importance is diminishing, this acknowledgement was often made with regret.

Keywords

EN

elite interviews; EU external perceptions; EU-New Zealand relations; small state theory

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Baltic Journal of European Studies
• Year: 2013
• Volume: 3
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 153-174

Dates

published

2013-12-01

online

2013-12-31

Contributors

author

Serena Kelly

• National Centre for Research on Europe, University of Canterbury Kirkwood Village KD04, Christchurch, New Zealand

References

• Bain, J. M. (2007), Europe at 6pm: Images of the EU on New Zealand Television News, [PhD thesis] Christchurch: University of Canterbury.
• Chaban, N. & Coleman, S. (2009), “Re-tracing Europe: Images and Perceptions of the EU in New Zealand History. The 1950s-The Beginning of the Story.” Paper presented at the 2009 Annual Conference ‘The External Relations of the European Union: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives’, 24-25 September, Melbourne, Australia.
• Chaban, N. & Gibbons, M. (2006), “Ownership Effects on New Zealand Newspapers’ Representation of EU Enlargement between January 2000 and May 2004,” in W. Gellner & M. Reichinger (eds.) Deutschland nach der Bundestagswahl 2005 - Fit für die globalen Aufgaben der erweiterten EU? Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag, pp. 231-240.
• Chaban, N.; Holland, M.; Jones, B.; Chan, K. & Cheung, P.-K., eds. (2005), The EU Through the Eyes of the Asia-Pacific: Public Perceptions and Media Representations, NCRE Research Series Working Paper, no. 4, Christchurch: University of Canterbury.
• Chaban, N.; Holland, M. & Schneider, C. E. (2007), “International News and Local Contexts: Framing of the EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy in New Zealand Newspapers (2004-2005),” in P. Anderson & G. Wiessala (eds.) The European Union and Asia: Reflections and Re-orientations, Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 55-82.
• Chaban, N.; Sammon, S. & Condren, J. (2010), “Europe’s Act of Brinkmanship? New Zealand and the EU Constitution,” in A. M. Arranz, N. J. Doyle, & P. Winand (eds.) New Europe, New World? The European Union, Europe and the Challenges of the 21st Century, Brussels, etc.: PIE Peter Lang, pp. 249-278.
• Chaban, N.; Stats, K.; Bain, J. & Machin, F. (2005), ‘Past imperfect, present continuous, future indefinite? Images of Turkey in the context of EU integration in ANZAC media,’ Insight Turkey, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 12-34.
• European Commission (2011), European Union and New Zealand to pursue Framework Agreement, Press release, A 432/11, Brussels: European Commission, 27 October 2011.
• Fallow, B. (2012), “EU-NZ trade talks ‘premature’,” New Zealand Herald, 21 March 2012, p. B12.
• Gibbons, M. (2008), New Zealand and the European Union, North Shore: Pearson Education, New Zealand.
• Gibbons, M. & Holland, M. (2007), ‘Friends Reunited? New Zealand and the European Union,’ in R. Alley (ed.) New Zealand in World Affairs IV 1990-2005, Wellington: Victoria University Press & New Zealand Institute of International Affairs, pp. 180-200.
• Goetschel, L., ed. (1998), Small States Inside and Outside the European Union, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2832-3[Crossref]
• Goff, P. (2005), ‘Multilateralism in NZ Foreign Policy,’ beehive.govt.nz, 19 April 2005. Retrieved from http://www.beehive.govt.nz/node/21717 [accessed 1 Jul 2012]
• Henderson, J. (1980), ‘The Foreign Policy of a Small State,’ in J. Henderson, W. K. Jackson & R. Kennaway (eds.) Beyond New Zealand: the Foreign Policy of a Small State, Auckland: Methuen.
• Holland, M.; Chaban, N.; Bain, J.; Stats, K. & Sutthisripok, P., eds. (2005), EU in the Views of Asia-Pacific Elites: Australia, New Zealand and Thailand, NCRE Research Series Working Paper, no. 5, Christchurch: University of Canterbury.
• Holland, M. & Jones, B. (2005)‚ ‘Public Attitudes towards the European Union in Australia and New Zealand,‘ in W. Gellner & M. Reichinger (eds.) Deutschland nach der Bundestagswahl 2005 - Fit für die globalen Aufgaben der erweiterten EU? Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag, pp. 231-240.
• Hu, R. W. (2009), Building Asia Pacific Regional Architecture: The Challenge of Hybrid Regionalism, CEAP Visiting Fellows Series Working Paper, no. 47. Retrieved from http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/research/files/papers/2009/7/asia%20pacific%20hu/07_asia_pacific_hu [accessed 23 Jul 2012]
• Jackson, K. (1971), Fight for Life; New Zealand, Britain and the European Economic Community, Wellington: Price Milburn.
• Jackson, K. & Harré, J. (1969), New Zealand, London: Thames & Hudson.
• Johnston, R. (1997), ‘Geopolitical transition and international realignment: The case of New Zealand,’ Geopolitics and International Boundaries, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 43-69.
• Kahler, M. (1992), ‘Multilateralism with small and large numbers,’ International Organization, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 681-708. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027867[Crossref]
• Kelly, S. (2010), “Clutching at the apron strings? New Zealand’s relationship with the EU and the possible consequences for ASEM,” Asia Europe Journal, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 212-226. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10308-010-0262-y [Crossref][WoS]
• Keohane, R. O. (1969), “‘Lilliputians’ Dilemmas: Small States in International Politics,’ International Organization, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 291-310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S002081830003160X [Crossref]
• Lodge, J. (1978), ‘New Zealand and the Community,’ The World Today, no. 34, pp. 303-310.
• - (1982), The European Community and New Zealand, London: Pinter.
• McLuskie, R. (1986), The Great Debate: New Zealand, Britain and the EEC: The shaping of attitudes, Wellington: Decision Research Centre, Victoria University.
• McMillan, S. (2003), ‘Enlarging the European Union: Stuart McMillan discusses the likely impact of projected accessions to the European Union and foresees significant challenges for New Zealand,’ New Zealand International Review, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 7-11.
• Moravcsik, A. & Vachudova, M. A. (2003), ‘National Interests, State Power, and EU Enlargement,’ East European Politics & Societies, vol. 17, pp. 42-57. Retrieved from http://www.stats.govt.nz/tools_and_services/tools/population_clock.aspx [accessed 18 Jul 2012]
• Ólafsson, B. G. (1998), Small States in the Global System: Analysis and Illustrations from the Case of Iceland, Aldershot: Ashgate.
• Schimmelfennig, F. & Sedelmeier, U. (2002), ‘Theorizing EU enlargement: research focus, hypotheses, and the state of research,’ Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 500-528. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13501760210152411[Crossref]
• Singleton, J. & Robertson, P. L. (1997), ‘Britain, Butter, and European Integration, 1957-1964,’ The Economic History Review, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 327-347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0289.00057 [Crossref]
• - (2002), Economic Relations between Britain and Australasia 1945-1970, Basingstoke & New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Sinn, H.-W. (2000), ‘EU Enlargement, Migration, and Lessons from German Unification,’ German Economic Review, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 299-314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0475.00015[Crossref]
• Sklias, P. (2010), ‘Globalism Versus Regionalism? The International Political Economy of Regional Cooperation in the Third World,’ European Journal of Social Sciences, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 489-495.
• Steinmetz, R. & Wivel, A., eds. (2010), Small States in Europe: Challenges and Opportunities, Farnham: Ashgate.
• Sutton, P. & Payne, A. (1993), ‘Lilliput Under Threat: The Security Problems of Small Island and Enclave Developing States’, Political Studies, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 579-593. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1993.tb01657.x [Crossref]
• Vital, D. (1971), The Survival of Small States: Studies in Small Power/Great Power Conflict, London & New York: Oxford University Press.
• Wiberg, H. (1987), ‘The Security of Small Nations: Challenges and Defences,’ Journal of Peace Research, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 339-363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002234338702400403 [Crossref]

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/bjes-2013-0025