Mechanisms Fostering Social Entrepreneurship as Potential Instruments for Economic Development: The Eastern Partnership Perspective

• Authors: Dāvis Plotnieks
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

With its plan to assign 600 million euros through the European Neighbourhood Instrument for Eastern Partnership countries, the European Union intended to increase the efficiency of institutions, attenuate social problems, and create an environment that fosters economic growth and human well-being in Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine. A few scholars have criticized the amount of funding and planned initiatives of the European Neighbourhood Instrument as insufficient and suggested that in order to foster cooperation and support reforms in its Eastern Partnership countries, more action should be taken. In times when European Commission budget is under constraints of consolidation and increase of aid for supporting European Neighbourhood countries is hardly possible, alternative solutions for tempering social problems need to be assessed. Various scientists, philanthropists and entrepreneurs see social entrepreneurship as a tool for solving social problems in a sustainable way where business thinking is being combined with non-profit philosophy. Contrary to government support and intervention for solving social problems, social entrepreneurship is already being used as tool that initially addresses joint needs--solve social problems and create revenue that provides much needed income for sustainable business initiatives. This paper analyzes the concept of social entrepreneurship, examples where social entrepreneurship is solving social problems, and mechanisms that can foster these phenomena. The aim of this paper is to examine different mechanisms of how governments can foster the creation and development of social entrepreneurship. Unique survey data derived from a project examining social entrepreneurship in Europe is used. It is concluded that by adopting mechanisms proven in various developed countries, the Eastern Partnership countries can stimulate social entrepreneurship, thus attenuating social problems and creating environment that fosters economic growth and the wellbeing of people

Keywords

EN

Eastern Partnership; social entrepreneurship; mechanisms for social entrepreneurship

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Baltic Journal of European Studies
• Year: 2014
• Volume: 4
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 34-49

Dates

published

2014-10-01

online

2014-11-05

Contributors

author

Dāvis Plotnieks

• Faculty of Economics and Management, University of Latvia Aspazijas blvd.5, Riga LV-1050, Latvia

References

• Alvord, S. H.; Brown, L. D. & Letts, C. W. (2004), ‘Social Entrepreneurship and Societal Transformation An Exploratory Study,’ The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 260-282. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0021886304266847[Crossref]
• Amorós, J. E. & Bosma, N. (2014), ‘Global Entrepreneurship Monitor,’ in 2013 Global Report, London: Global Entrepreneurship Research Association (GERA).
• Antadze, N. & Westley, F. R. (2012), ‘Impact Metrics for Social Innovation: Barriers or Bridges to Radical Change?’ Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 133-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2012.726005[Crossref]
• Austin, J.; Stevenson, H. & Wei-Skillern, J. (2006), ‘Social and commercial entrepreneurship: same, different, or both?’ Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 1-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00107.x [Crossref]
• Boonstra, J. & Shapovalova, N. (2010), The EU’s Eastern Partnership: One Year Backwards, Working Paper 99, Madrid: FRIDE.
• Bosse, G. & Korosteleva-Polglase, E. (2009), ‘Changing Belarus? The limits of EU governance in Eastern Europe and the promise of partnership,’ Cooperation and Conflict: Journal of the Nordic International Studies Association, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 143-165.
• Brooks, A. C. (2009), Social Entrepreneurship: A Modern Approach to Social Value Creation, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
• Bugg-Levine, A. & Emerson, J. (2011), Impact Investing: Transforming How We Make Money While Making a Difference, San Francisco: Wiley Imprint.
• Bugg-Levine, A.; Kogut, B. & Kulatilaka, N. (2012), ‘A new approach to funding social enterprises,’ Harvard Business Review, Reprint no. R1201K, pp. 1-7.
• Chaves, R. A. & Monzón, J. L. (2007), The Social Economy in the European Union, Report drawn up for the European Economic and Social Committee by the International Centre of Research and Information on the Public, Social and Cooperative Economy (CIRIEC).
• CUA (2006), A Social Investment Bank, Consultation paper of the Commission on Unclaimed Assets, United Kingdom. Retrieved from http://www.ronaldcohen.org/sites/default/files/1/CUA_ConsultationPaper.pdf [accessed 9 Jun 2014]
• Dacin, P. A.; Dacin, M. T. & Matear, M. (2010), “Social entrepreneurship: why we don’t need a new theory and how we move forward from here,” The Academy of Management Perspectives, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 37-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMP.2010.52842950[Crossref]
• Defourny, J. & Nyssens, M. (2008), ‘Social enterprise in Europe: recent trends and developments,’ Social Enterprise Journal, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 202-228.
• DiMaggio, P. J. & Anheier, H. K. (1990), ‘The sociology of non-profit organizations and sectors,’ Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 16, pp. 137-159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.16.080190.001033[Crossref]
• Drexler, M.; Noble, A. & Bryce, J. (2013), From the Margins to the Mainstream: Assessment of the Impact Investment Sector and Opportunities to Engage Mainstream Investors, Geneva: World Economic Forum, Switzerland.
• DTI (2003), A Progress Report on Social Enterprise: A Strategy for Success Department of Trade and Industry, London: Department of Trade and Industry.
• Ebrahim, A. (2003), ‘Accountability in practice: Mechanisms for NGOs,’ World Development, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 813-829.[Crossref]
• Ebrahim, A. S. & Rangan, V. K. (2010), The Limits of Nonprofit Impact: A Contingency Framework for Measuring Social Performance, Harvard Business School General Management Unit Working Paper, no. 10-099. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(03)00014-7[Crossref]
• European Commission (2008), Eastern Partnership, COM(2008) 823, European Commission, 3 December 2008. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/where/neighbourhood/eastern_partnership/documents/eastern_partnership_communication_from_the_commission_to_the_european_parliament_and_the_council_en.pdf [accessed 6 May 2014]
• -- (2011), Social Business Initiative: Creating a favourable climate for social enterprises, key stakeholders in the social economy and innovation, COM(2011) 682, European Commission, 25 October 2011. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0682:FIN:EN:PDF [accessed 8 May 2014]
• Franke, A.; Gawrich, A.; Melnykovska, I. & Schweickert, R. (2010), “The European Union’s Relations with Ukraine and Azerbaijan,” Post- Soviet Affairs, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 149-183. http://dx.doi.org/10.2747/1060-586X.26.2.149[WoS][Crossref]
• Freireich, J. & Fulton, K. (2009), Investing for Social and Environmental Impact: A Design for Catalyzing an Emerging Industry, Cambridge, MA: The Monitor Group.
• Huysentruyt, M.; Rimac, T.; Stephan, U.; Essen, E. & Vujić, S. (2010), Personalized Country Feedback Reports, Selusi Research Consortium. Retrieved from http:// www.selusi.eu/index.php?page=business-platform [accessed 4 July 2014]
• Kaplan, R. S. & Grossman, A. S. (2010), ‘The emerging capital market for nonprofits,’ Harvard Business Review, vol. 88, no. 10, pp. 110-118.
• Kelley, J. (2006), ‘New Wine in Old Wineskins: Promoting Political Reforms through the New European Neighbourhood Policy,’ JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 29-55.
• Kerlin, J. A. (2006), ‘Social enterprise in the United States and Europe: Understanding and learning from the differences,’ Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 246-262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11266-006-9016-2[Crossref]
• Korosec, R. L. & Berman, E. M. (2006), ‘Municipal support for social entrepreneurship,’ Public Administration Review, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 448-462.[Crossref]
• Łapczyński, M. (2009), “The European Union’s Eastern Partnership: Chances and Perspectives,” Caucasian Review of International Affairs, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 143-155.
• Maddison, S. & Hamilton, C. (2007), Non-Government Organisations. Silencing Dissent: How the Australian Government is controlling public opinion and stifling debate, Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
• Nicholls, A. (2009), “We Do Good Things Don’t We?: Blended Value Accounting in Social Entrepreneurship,” Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol. 34, nos. 6-7, pp. 755-769. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.008 [Crossref][WoS]
• -- (2010), ‘The institutionalization of social investment: The interplay of investment logics and investor rationalities,’ Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 70-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420671003701257[Crossref]
• Nicholls, A. & Cho, A. H. (2006), ‘Social entrepreneurship: The structuration of a field,’ in A. Nicholls (ed.) Social Entrepreneurship: New Models of Sustainable Social Change, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 99-118.
• O’Donohoe, N.; Leijonhufvud, C.; Saltuk, Y.; Bugg-Levine, A. & Brandenburg, M. (2010), Impact Investments: An Emerging Asset Class, J.P.Morgan, The Rockefeller Foundation & Global Impact Investing Network.
• Paton, R. (2003), Managing and Measuring Social Enterprises, London: Sage.
• Peredo, A. M. & McLean, M. (2006), ‘Social entrepreneurship: A critical review of the concept,’ Journal of World Business, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 56-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.10.007[Crossref]
• Saltuk, Y.; Idrissi, A. E.; Bouri, A.; Mudaliar, A. & Schiff, H. (2014), Spotlight on the Market: The Impact Investor Survey, Global Social Finance, J.P.Morgan.
• Schäffer, S. & Tolksdorf, D. (2009), The Eastern Partnership -“ENP plus” for Europe’s Eastern Neighbors, CA Perspectives, no. 4, Center for Applied Policy Research & Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich.
• Seelos, C. & Mair, J. (2007), ‘Profitable business models and market creation in the context of deep poverty: a strategic view,’ Academy of Management Perspectives, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 49-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMP.2007.27895339[Crossref]
• Sen, P. (2007), “Ashoka’s big idea: Transforming the world through social entrepreneurship,” Futures, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 534-553. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2006.10.013[Crossref]
• Terjesen, S.; Lepoutre, J.; Justo, R. & Bosma, N. (2012), The Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: Report on Social Entrepreneurship 2009, Babson Park, MA & Santiago, Chile & London: Babson College & Universidad del Desarrollo & Global Entrepreneurship Research Association.
• Thompson, J. & Doherty, B. (2006), ‘The diverse world of social enterprise: A collection of social enterprise stories,’ International Journal of Social Economics, vol. 33, nos. 5/6, pp. 361-375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03068290610660643[Crossref]
• Tracey, P. & Jarvis, O. (2007), ‘Toward a theory of social venture franchising,’ Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 667-685. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00194.x [Crossref]
• Wood, D.; Thornley, B. & Grace, K. (2012), Impact at Scale: Policy Innovation for Institutional Investment with Social and Environmental Benefit, Pacific Community Ventures, Institute for Responsible Investment at Harvard University & Rockefeller Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/blog/impact-scale-policy-innovation [accessed 20 May 2014]

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/bjes-2014-0014