Perceptions of Research in Education for Sustainable Development: An International Perspective

• Authors: Anita Pipere , Jyrki Reunamo , Marion Jones
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This paper reports on a study undertaken to investigate international perspectives of what constitutes research in education for sustainable development (ESD). By employing inductive thematic content analysis, the authors sought to examine the perceptions of 66 ESD researchers from 19 countries. The findings reveal a concern with the methodological aspects of research and an emergent need for synergy between the methodology of educational research and specific themes relevant to ESD research. The significant overlap of themes and aspects of ESD research apparent across the different contexts within which the researchers were embedded indicates a unified core of ESD research, although there is also evidence of contextual factors influencing the research agenda. Based on the findings of this study, the paper concludes that there is an overlap between educational research and ESD research, but that the latter has its own specific aims, themes and political supporters. In an endeavour to develop a shared understanding about ESD research across disciplines and research context, a common language has to be developed to facilitate a constructive dialogue and research capacity building in this novel field.

Keywords

EN

ESD research; educational research; researchers; methodology

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education
• Year: 2010
• Volume: 1
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 5-24

Dates

published

2010-06-01

online

2013-06-15

Contributors

author

Anita Pipere

• Institute of Sustainable Education, Faculty of Education and Management, Daugavpils University, Parādes Street 1–432, Daugavpils, LV-5401, Latvia. Tel.: + 371 654 27411

author

Jyrki Reunamo

• University of Helsinki, Finland

author

Marion Jones

• Liverpool John Moores University, Great Britain

References

• Anadolu University. (2008). The 6th International Conference Sustainable Development. Culture. Education: Collaboration on Education for Sustainable Development. Conference guide. June 4-7, 2008, Eskişehir, Turkey.
• Ball, D. L., & Forzani, F. M. (2007). 2007 Wallace foundation distinguished lecture: What makes education research “educational”? Educational Researcher, 36(9), 529-540. DOIi: 10.3102/0013189X07312896.
• Baxter, L. A. (1991). Content analysis. In B. M. Montgomery & S. Duck (Eds.), Studyinginterpersonal interaction (pp. 239-254). New York: The Guilford Press.
• Bauer, M.W., & Gaskell, G. D. (Eds.). (2000). Qualitative researching with text, image andsound: A practical handbook for social research (Developments in plant and soilsciences). Sage Publications Ltd.
• Berliner, D. C. (2002). Comment: Educational research: The hardest science of all. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 18-20. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X031008018.[Crossref]
• Bond, L. A., Holmes, T. R., Byrne, C. Babchuck, L., & Kirton-Robbins, S. (2008). Movers and shakers: How and why women become and remain engaged in community leadership. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 48-64.[WoS]
• Boyatzis, R. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and codedevelopment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Bullough, Jr. R. V. (2006). Developing interdisciplinary researchers: What ever happened to the humanities in education? Educational Researcher, 35(8), 3-10. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X035008003.[Crossref]
• Burkhardt, H. & Schoenfeld, A. H. (2003). Improving educational research: Toward a more useful, more influential, and better-funded enterprise. Educational Researcher, 32(9), 3-14. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X032009003.[Crossref]
• Cook, R., Cutting, R., & Summers, D. (2010). If sustainability needs new values, whose values? Initial Teacher Training and the transition to sustainability. In P. Jones, D. Selby & S. Sterling (Eds.), Sustainability education: Perspectives and practice acrosshigher education, Chapter 17. London: Earthscan.
• Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing amongtraditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Daniels, S. E., & Walker, G. B. (2001). Working through environmental conflict: Thecollaborative learning approach. Westport, CT: Praeger.
• DELLS. (2006). Education for sustainable development and global citizenship: A strategyfor action, DELLS Information Document No: 017-06. Cardiff: Welsh Assembly Government.
• Denby, L., Tilbury, D., & Cerone, F. (2007). Sustainability in Noosa: A case study. Australian Research Institute in Education for Sustainability (ARIES) for the Australian Government Department of the Environment and Heritage. Sydney: ARIES.
• DCELLS. (2008). Education for sustainable development and global citizenship: Acommon understanding for schools. Information Document No.065/2008. Cardiff: Welsh Assembly Government.
• Dewey, J. (2009). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy ofeducation. New York: WLC Books.
• Erickson, P. I., & Kaplan, C. P. (2000). Maximizing qualitative responses about smoking in structured interviews. Qualitative Health Research, 10, 829-840.[PubMed][Crossref]
• Everett, J. (2008). Sustainability in higher education: Implications for the disciplines. Theory and Research in Education, 6(2), 237-251. DOI: 10.1177/1477878508091115.[Crossref]
• Feuer, M. J., Towne, L., & Shavelson, R. J. (2002). Scientific culture and educational research. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 4-14. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X031008004.[Crossref]
• Härkönen, U. (2003). The new systems theory of early childhood education and preschool as a frame of reference for sustainable education. Journal of Teacher Education andTraining, 2, 25-38.
• Heimlich, J. E. (2007). Research trends in the United States: EE to ESD. Journal ofEducation for Sustainable Development, 1(2), 219-227. DOI: 10.1177/097340820700100212.[Crossref]
• Henderson, K., & Tilbury, D. (2004). Whole-school approaches to sustainability: Aninternational review of whole-school sustainability programs. Report prepared by the Australian Research Institute in Education for Sustainability (ARIES) for the Australian Government Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts.
• Howe, K. R. (2008). Isolating science from the humanities: The third dogma of educational research. Qualitative Inquiry Online First, 1-19. Retrieved October 21, 2008, from http://qix.sagepub.com hosted at http://online.sagepub.comDOI:10.1177/1077800408318302.
• Hutchins, A. Hastie, A., Starkey, C., Hilton, S., & Clark, R. (2005). An investigation into the benefits of prolonged study leave undertaken by general practitioners. Educationfor Primary Care, 16, 57-65.
• Jithoo, V. (2010). To tell or not to tell; the childhood cancer conundrum: Parental communication and information-seeking. South African Journal of Psychology, 40(3), 351-360.[WoS]
• Joffe, H., & Yardley, L. (2003). Content and thematic analysis. In D. F. Marks & L. Yardley (Eds.), Research Methods for Clinical and Health Psychology (pp. 56-68). Sage Publications Ltd.
• Keen, M., Brown, V. A., & Dyball, R. (2005). Social learning: A new approach to environmental management. In M. Keen, V. A. Brown & R. Dyball (Eds.), Sociallearning in environmental management: Towards a sustainable future (pp. 3-21). Earthscan, London.
• Labaree, D. F. (2003). The peculiar problems of preparing educational researchers. Educational Research, 32(4), 13-22. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X032004013.[Crossref]
• Lagemann, E. C. (1997). Contested terrain: A history of education research in the United States, 1890-1990. Educational Researcher, 26(9), 5-17. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X026009005.[Crossref]
• Malterud, K. (1993). Shared understanding of the qualitative research process. Guidelines for the medical researcher. Family Practice, 10, 201-206.
• Mandolini, C. (2007). Conditions, processes, and aims of teacher education: A philosophical perspective. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 7, 5-13.
• McKeown, R. (2007). Setting the stage for a strategic research agenda for the UNDESD: A joint UNU-UNESCO workshop. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development,1(1), 91-96. DOI: 10.1177/097340820700100115.[Crossref]
• Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Minichiello, V., Aroni, R., Timewell, E., & Alexander, L. (1990). In-depth interviewing:Researching people. Hong Kong: Longman Cheshire Pty Limited.
• Moses, M. S. (2002). The heart of the matter: Philosophy and educational research. Reviewof Research in Education, 26(1), Chapter 1. DOI: 10.3102/0091732X026001001.[Crossref]
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Paul, J. L., & Marfo, K. (2001). Preparation of educational researchers in philosophical foundations of inquiry. Review of Educational Research, 71(4), 525-547. DOI: 10.3102/00346543071004525.[Crossref]
• Pothas, A. M., Andries, D., & DeWet, J. (2001). Customer satisfaction: Keeping tabs on the issues that matter. Total Quality Management, 12, 83-94.
• Salīte, I. (2008). Educational action research for sustainability: Constructing a vision for the future in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 10, 5-16.
• St.Pierre, E. A. (2006). Scientifically based research in Education: Epistemology and Ethics. Adult Education Quarterly, 56(4), 239-266. DOI: 10.1177/0741713606289025.[Crossref]
• Summers, D. (2010). Embedding education for sustainable development in initial teacher training in the lifelong learning sector. Teaching in Lifelong Learning, 2(1), 35-46.
• Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative andquantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Tilbury, D., & Ross, K. (2005). Living change: Documenting good practice in educationfor sustainability in NSW. Macquarie University, Sydney and the Nature Conservation Council, NSW.
• Weber, R. P. (Ed.). (1990). Basic content analysis (quantitative applications in the socialsciences). Sage Publications, Inc.
• Wright, T. (2007). Higher education for sustainability: Developing a comprehensive research agenda. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 1(1), 101-106. DOI: 10.1177/097340820700100114.[Crossref]
• Wright, T., & Pullen, S. (2007). Examining the literature: A bibliometric study of ESD journal articles in the Education Resources Information Center Database. Journal ofEducation for Sustainable Development, 1(1), 77-90. DOI: 10.1177/09734082070010 0114[Crossref]

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/dcse-2013-0011