Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2014 | 15 | 1 | 41-53

Article title

Analysis of Selected Investment Fund Type Ranking Position – PROMETHEE Method Application

Authors

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
We decided to use the PROMETHEE method to rank selected types of investment funds offered on the Polish market. In our deliberations, we took an interest in the investor with a certain aversion to risk who chooses from among treasury securities or stable growth funds. We took into consideration whole ranking lists made for half-yearly periods from 2010 to 2012 instead of the specific objects pointed by model. We decided to check whether, among investment products of interest to us, there are stable relationships over time arising from their ranking positions that allow to identify regular groups of leaders and outsiders. Moreover, we checked the influence of the fund size measured by the value of its assets on its ranking position.

Publisher

Year

Volume

15

Issue

1

Pages

41-53

Physical description

Dates

published
2014-01-01
online
2014-05-30

Contributors

  • University of Lodz

References

  • Aczel A. (2009), Statystyka w zarządzaniu [Statistics in management], PWN, Warsaw.
  • Albadvi A., Chaharsooghi S. K., Esfahanipour A. (2007), Decision making in stock trading: An application of PROMETHEE, European Journal of Operational Research 177, pp. 673-683.[WoS]
  • Ben Amor S., Mareschal B. (2012), Integrating imperfection of information into the PROMETHEE multicriteria decision aid methods: A general framework, Foundation of Computing and Decision Sciences 37 (1), pp. 9-23.
  • Gelderman J., Schöbel A. (2011), On the similarities of some multicriteria decision analysis methods, Journal of Multicriteria Decision Analysis 18, 3-4, pp. 219-230.
  • Gruszczyński M. (Ed.) (2010), Mikroekonometria. Modele i metody analizy danych indywidualnych [Microeconometrics. Models and methods of individual data analysis], Wolters Kluwer Polska, Warsaw.
  • Hajkowicz S. Higgins A. (2008), A comparision of multiple criteria analysis techniques for water resource management, European Journal of Operational Research 184, 1, pp. 255-265.
  • Kaliszewski I. (2008), Wielokryterialne podejmowanie decyzji [Multicriteria decision-making], WNT, Warsaw.
  • Macharis C., Springael J., De Brucker K., Verbeke A. (2004), PROMETHEE and AHP: The design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis.
  • Strengthening PROMETHEE with ideas of AHP, European Journal of Operational Research 153, pp. 307-317.
  • Marcinkowska M. (2007), Ocena działalności instytucji finansowych [Appraisal of investment institutions’ activities], Difin, Warsaw.
  • Raport 2012 [2012 report], Chamber of Fund and Asset Management, www.izfa.pl.
  • Trzaskalik T. (2008), Wprowadzenie do badań operacyjnych z komputerem [Introduction to operational research with the computer], PWE Warsaw.
  • Zavadskas E. K., Turksis Z. (2011), Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in economics: an overview, Technological Economic Development of Economy 17, pp. 397-427.[WoS]
  • Ziemba P., Piwowarski M. (2008), Metody analizy wielokryterialnej we wspomaganiu porównywania produktów w Internecie [Methods of multicriteria analysis in supporting product comparison on the Internet], Metody informatyki stosowanej 2/2008 (vol. 15), pp. 137-147

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.doi-10_2478_eam-2014-0003
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.