The Police System Reform in Georgia (Informal Power its Forms, Types and Spheres of Influence)

• Authors: Tamar Charkviani
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

It is a widely accepted notion that the major change brought by the 2003 November revolution in Georgia was the reform of the public services. Two major tasks were to be achieved for the state institutions: to monopolize the use of legitimate power on the state territory and to start providing services to the citizens. Police reform was at the heart of both these objectives. The major obstacle identified on the way of this reform was corruption. Indeed it was widely known that posts in police forces were to be purchased; policemen were involved in organized crime, extortion, and other illegal pursuits. But the corruption itself was the effect of the broader system in which patrimonial system of not distinguishing between the public office and private sphere was hybridized with the legal-rational rule, having its origin in the Soviet Union. The main subject of our research is to analyze the model of informal power network in Georgian police, to describe its configurations and identify its social actors. For the theoretical approach in our study we will use different theories describing informal institutes and the reasons of their existence. One of the main theoretical sources for our analysis will be the theoretical concept of Helmke and Levitsky. Helmke and Levitsky are describing four types of informal institutions which we plan to apply to Georgian police system and identify which of them is more relevant for Georgian reality. Also we will refer to such theories as: Mark Granoveter's strength of week ties and social “embeddedness” of economic action; Mars and Altman's Cultural Basis of Soviet Georgia; Ledeneva's theory of “Blat”, which is one of most popular analytical theory about informal relations in post-Soviet countries. The main methods we have used are in-depth and narrative interviews. The interviews have been conducted with policemen currently working in different police departments, policemen no more working in this structure, expert and NGO representatives.

Keywords

EN

Post Soviet studies; Social networks; Police; Informal power

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: International Journal of Area Studies
• Year: 2014
• Volume: 9
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 95-112

Dates

online

2014-12-10

Contributors

author

Tamar Charkviani

• Ilia State University

References

• Beck, U., 1992. Risk Society, Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage Publications, p.260.
• Boda, J. and Kornel, K., 2005. The Current Status of Police Reform in Georgia. From Revolution to Reform. Published by: Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF).
• Charkviani, T., 2006. Informal Labour Relations in Governmental Institutions. SouthCaucasus: Spaces. Histories. People. 2. On Russian language. Tbilisi. Published by: Heinrich Boell Foundation, pp. 234-250
• Charkviani, T. and Chelidze, A., 2012. The Process of Formation of Meritocracy in Transforming Public Services. Published by: Ilia State University. Tbilisi.
• Coleman, J.S., 1986. Social Theory, Social Research, and a Theory of Action. American Journal of Sociology 91, pp.1309-1335.
• Golesenko, I., 2003. The phenomenon of “Russian bribe”: the historical overview of the native sociology of bureaucracy. Available at: http://www.gumer. info bibliotek_Buks/History/Article/go;os_fen.php [Accessed 15 September 2013].
• Granovetter, M., 1983. The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited. Sociological Theory 1, pp.201−233.
• Granovetter, M., 1985. Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), pp.481−510.[Crossref]
• Kakachia K. and O'Shea, L., 2012. Why does police reform appear to have been more successful in Georgia than in Kyrgyzstan or Russia?. The Journal of Power Institutions in Post-Soviet Societies 13 [Online], Available at: http:// pipss.revues.org/3964 [Accessed 17 September 2013]
• Ledeneva, A.V., 1998. Russia's economy of favours: Blat, networking and informal exchange. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Leiter, S., and Tedstrom J. 1997. Russia's Informal Economy: A Framework for Analysis RAND Working Paper DRU-1678.
• Mizruchi, S., 2001. Religion and Cultural Studies. Princeton; Oxford: Princeton University Press.
• Mars G. and Altman Y. 1983. The Cultural Basis of Soviet Georgia's Second Economy. In: Soviet Studies 35, (4), pp.546−560.
• Nordin, V. D. and Glonti, G., 2006. Thieves of the Law and the Rule of Law in Georgia. Caucasian Review of International Affairs, 1/1.
• Powell, W.W., Smith-Doerr, L. 2003. Networks and Economic Life. The Handbook of Economic Sociology, Second Edition, edited by N. J. Smelser and R. Swedberg. Princeton, NJ, Russell Sage Foundation/Princeton University Press.
• Helmke, G. and Levitsky S., 2004. Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda. Perspectives on Politics, 2(4), pp.725-740.
• Russel, B. H., 2002. Reseach Methods in Anthropology. Qualitative and Quantitative? Approaches. Third edition. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press, pp. 206-220 (Unstructured? Interviewing) and 449-488 (Some Traditions of Text Analysis).
• Slade, G., 2008, The Threat of the Thief: Who Has Normative Influence in Georgian Society? (Global Crime, 8(2) May).
• Spradley, J. P., 1979. Ethnographic Interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, p. 92
• Theodore, P.G., and Sarah E., 2008. Mendelson Public Experiences of Police Violence and Corruption in Contemporary Russia: A Case of Predatory Policing? Law and Society Review, 42(1), p.2.[WoS]
• Weiss, R.S., 1994. Learning from Strangers. The Art and Method of Qualitative Interview Studies. New York: Free Press, p. 208.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/ijas-2014-0007