Factors influencing the pronunciation of adult speakers of a foreign language

• Authors: Emilia Szalkowska-Kim
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The present paper is an overview of selected investigations into acquisition of second language phonology (L2).1 It describes L2 phonology researchers’ attempts to determine the number, quantity, quality and roles of the factors which shape the pronunciation of L2 adult speakers, i.e. what is the influence of native language limitation, how the L2 phonology acquisition is governed by universal linguistic features, and whether adults use the same processes in acquiring the L2 that are used by children when they acquire their first language. This article will describe a number of longstanding phonetic and phonological projects whose aim was to discover patterns in the improvement of pronunciation in a second language (see research by Archibald, Broselow, Eckman, Flege, Hancin-Bhatt, Major and Weinberger, published in numerous compilations). It strives to explain the universal stages in the development of second language phonology. The main goal of the research is to assess the grammatical knowledge of the L2 learner, i.e. their competence in their interlanguage. The analyses show typological disproportions and universality of the strategies applied by the speakers in the target language. A few important hypotheses have been established (see below for their description), but it is important to note that most of the results verifying these hypotheses concern the acquisition of the English language, with a variable being the “input” languages of the speakers. Although this unilateral focus of the research projects reflects the expansion of the English language as the lingua franca of modern times, it might severely limit understanding of the important and interesting aspects of second language acquisition which structurally do not apply to that language, and are consequently overlooked.

Keywords

EN

second language acquisition; second language phonology; pronunciation

• Publisher: Poznańskie Towarzystwo Przyjaciół Nauk
• Journal: Lingua Posnaniensis
• Year: 2015
• Volume: 56
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 141-158

Dates

online

2015-07-24

Contributors

author

Emilia Szalkowska-Kim

• Department of Polish Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies

References

• Akamatsu, Nobuhiko. 2003. T he effects of first language orthographic features on second language reading in text. Language Learning 53(2). 207-231.[Crossref]
• Altenberg, E velyn P . & Vago, Robert M. 1983. T heoretical implications of an error analysis of second language phonology production. Language Learning 33. 427-447.[Crossref]
• Archibald, J ohn. 2000. P arsing procedures and the question of full access in L 2 phonology. New Sounds 2000 Plenary Address. Best 1995.
• Birdsong, David. & Molis, Michelle. 2001. O n the evidence for maturational constraints in second-language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language 44. 235-249.
• Boersma, P aul. 1998. Functional phonology. Formalizing the interactions between articulatory & perceptual drives. N etherlands G raduate School of L inguistics, IFOTT .
• Bornstein, Marc. 1989. Sensitive periods in development: Structural characteristics and causal interpretations. Psychological Bulletin 105. 179-197.[PubMed][Crossref]
• Broselow, E llen. 2001. Stress-epenthesis interactions. H alle & Vaux (eds.), SUN Y Stony Brook.
• Broselow, E llen. & Chen, S. & W ang, C. 1998. T he emergence of the unmarked. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20. 261-280.
• Broselow, E llen. & Finer, D. 1991. P arameter setting in second language phonology and syntax. Second Language Research 7. 35-59.[Crossref]
• Clements, G . N . & H ume, E . 1995. T he internal organization of speech sounds. In G oldsmith, (ed.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory, 245-306. Cambridge, Ma.-Oxford: Blackwell P ublishers.
• Desrochers, Richard. 1998. T he role of parameters in phonology: a critical account. Language Sciences 20. 369-397.[Crossref]
• Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K atarzyna. 1990. A theory of second language acquisition within the framework of Natural Phonology. A Polish-English Contrastive Study. P oznań: UA M P ress.
• Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K atarzyna. 1999. Fonologia naturalna: podstawy i zastosowania. In J assem, W . & Basztura C. & Demenko, G . & J assem, K . (eds.), Speech and Language Technology, vol. 3, 21-32. P oznań: P olish Phonetic A ssociation.
• Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K atarzyna. 2002. Speech is in the ear of the listener: some remarks on the acquisition of second language sounds. In: Selected Papers from the 6th College-wide Conference for Students of Languages, Linguistics, and Literature, Honolulu: U niversity of H awai´i.
• Eckman, Fred R. From phonemic differences to constraint rankings: research on second language phonology: State of the A rt. http://www.uwm.edu/~rlschlei/pdfs/L2.phonology.SOA.rev.pdf.
• Eckman, Fred R. & E lreyes, A . & Iverson, G . K . 2003. Some principles of second language phonology. Second Language Research 19(3). 169-208.[Crossref]
• Ellis, Rod. 2004. T he definition and measurement of L 2 explicit knowledge. Language Learning 54(2). 227-275.[Crossref]
• Flege, J ames E mil. 1981. T he phonological basis of foreign accent: A hypothesis. TESOL Quarterly 14. 443-455.[Crossref]
• Flege, J ames E mil. 1987. T he production of ‘new’ and ‘similar’ phones in a foreign language: evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics 15. 47-65.
• Flege, J ames E mil & Davidian, R. 1984. T ransfer and developmental processes in adult foreign language speech production. Applied Psycholinguistics 5. 323-347.[Crossref]
• Flege, J ames E mil & Bohn, O .-S. & J ang, S.-Y. 1997. E ffects of experience on non-native speakers’ production and perception of E nglish vowels. Journal of Phonetics 25. 437-470.[Crossref]
• Flege, J ames E mil & Munro, M. J . & MacKay, I. R. A . 1995. E ffects of age of second-language learning on the production of E nglish consonants. Speech Communication 16. 1-26.[Crossref]
• Flege, J ames E mil & Schirru, C. & MacKay, I. R. A . 2003. Interaction between the native and second language phonetic subsystems. Speech Communication 40. 467-491.[Crossref]
• Flege, J ames E mil & Yeni-Komshian, G . H . & L iu, S. 1999. A ge constraints on second-language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language 41, 78-104. ID jmla 1999.2638 at http://www.idealibrary.com.
• Gąsiorowski, P . 1999. T eoria optymalności: nowe spojrzenie na kompetencję językową. In J assem, W . & Basztura, Cz. & Demenko, G . & J assem, K . (eds.), Speech and Language Technology. Vol. 3, 51-57. P oznań: Polish P honetic A ssociation.
• Gnanadesikan, A malia. 2004. Markedness and faithfulness constraints in child phonology. In K ager, R. & P ater, J . & Z onneveld, W . (eds.), Constraints in Phonological Acquisition. Cambridge U niversity P ress.
• Goldsmith, J ohn. 1990. Autosegmental and Metrical Phonology. O xford: Blackwell.
• Greenberg, J . H . 1978. Universals of human language. Vol. 2. Phonology. Stanford: Stanford U niversity P ress.
• Grijzenhout, J anet & van Rooy, Bertus. Second language phonology: A cquisition through gradual constraint demotion. http://www.phil-fak.uni-duesseldorf.de/sfb282/working_papers/Sfb119.pdf.
• Hahne, A nja. 2001. W hat’s different in second-language processing? E vidence from event-related brain-potentials. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 30(3). 251-266.[Crossref]
• Hancin-Bhatt, Barbara. 2000. O ptimality in second language phonology: codas in T hai E SL. Second Language Research 16(3). 201-232.[Crossref]
• Harklau, L . 2002. T he role of writing in classroom second language acquisition. Journal of Second Language Writing 11. 329-350.[Crossref]
• Hayes, Rachel. (http://www.u.arizona.edu/~rhayes/) T he perception of novel phoneme contrasts in a second language: a developmental study of native speakers of E nglish learning J apanese Singleton and G eminate Consonant Contrasts. Coyote Papers 12. 28-41. Language in Cognitive Science.
• Hu, Ch.-F. 2003. P honological memory, phonological awareness and foreign language word learning. Language Learning 53(3). 429-462.[Crossref]
• Jacewicz, E wa. 1999. Phonological context in the acquisition of second language vowels. (Abstract) Jones, R. H . 1997. Beyond “listen and repeat”: pronunciation teaching materials and theories of second language. System 25(1). 103-112.
• Koren, Shira. 1995. Foreign language pronunciation testing: A new approach. System 23(3). 387-400.[Crossref]
• Lado, Robert. 1957. Linguistics across cultures: applied linguistics for language teachers. U niversity of Michigan P ress.
• Lakshmanan, U . & Selinker, L . 2001. A nalysing interlanguage: how do we know what learners know? Second Language Research 17(4). 393-420.[Crossref]
• Lenneberg, E . 1967. Biological foundations of language. N ew York: W iley.
• Lin, H .-L., Chang, H .-W., Cheung, H . 2004. T he effect of early E nglish learning on auditory perception of E nglish minimal pairs by T aiwan university students. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 33(1). 25-49.[Crossref]
• Lombardi, L inda. 2003. Second L anguage data and constraints on Manner: E xplaining substitutions for the E nglish interdentals. Second Language Research 19(3). 225-250.
• Major, Roy. C. 1987. A model for interlanguage phonology. In Ioup, G . & W einberger, S. (ed.), Interlanguage Phonology, 101-124. Rowley: N ewbury H ouse P ublishers.
• Major, Roy. C. 2000. Chronological and stylistic aspects of second language acquisition of consonant clusters. New Sounds 92: 2nd Amsterdam Symposium on the Acquisition of Second Language Speech.
• Major, Roy. C. 2001. Foreign accent: the ontogeny and phylogeny of second language phonology. Mahwah-New Jersey-London: L awrence E rlbaum A ssociates, P ublishers.
• Marsden, H eather. 2002. P overty of the stimulus and UG in J apanese L 2 acquisition: a response to Sheen (2000). Durham Working Papers in Linguistics 8. 67-80.
• McAllister, R. & Flege, J .E. & P iske, T . 1999. Second language comprehension: a discussion of some influencing factors. In The Proceedings of the 9th Annual Conference on the European Second Language Association (EU ROSLA 9), L und, Sweden.
• McCarthy, J ohn J . & P rince, A lan. 1994. T he emergence of the unmarked: O ptimality in prosodic morphology. NELS Proceedings 24. 333-379.
• Pallier, C. & Colomé, A . & Sebastian-Gallés, N . 2001. T he influence of native-language phonology on lexical access: exemplar-based vs. abstract lexical entries. Psychological Science 2001. [Crossref]
• Paradowska, A nna. 2002. 폴란드의 한국어 모음의 발음과 청취에 대한 실험음성학적 연구. Production and perception of Korean vowels by Polish learners: An experimental phonetic approach. Seoul N ational U niversity. (Unpublished doctoral thesis)
• Piske, T . & MacKay, I.R.A. & Flege, J .E. 2001. Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L 2: a review. Journal of Phonetics 29. 191-215.[Crossref]
• Prince, A lan S. & Smolensky, P aul. 1993. O ptimality theory. Constrain interaction in G enerative G rammar. ROA Version, 8/2002.
• Robinson, P eter. 2001. Individual differences, cognitive abilities, aptitude complexes and learning conditions in second language acquisition. Second Language Research 17(4). 368-392.[Crossref]
• Selinker, L arry. 1972. Interlanguage. IRAL 10. 209-231.[Crossref]
• Shohamy, E lana. 2000. T he relationship between language testing and second language acquisition, revisited. System 28. 541-553.[Crossref]
• Tan, L .H. & Spinks, J .A. & Feng, C.-M. & Siok, W .T. & P erfetti, C.A. & Xiong, J . & Fox, P .T. & G ao, J .H. 2003. N eural systems of second language reading are shaped by native language. Human Brain Mapping 18. 158-166.[Crossref]
• Tesar, Bruce & Smolensky, P aul. 1998. L earnability in O ptimality T heory. Linguistic Inquiry 29. 229-268.[Crossref]
• Wode, H . 1976. Developmental sequences in naturalistic second language acquisition. Working Papers on Bilingualism 11. 1-13.
• Yang, Byunggon. 1996. A comparative study of A merican E nglish and K orean vowels produced by male and female speakers. Journal of Phonetics 24. 245-261.[Crossref]

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/linpo-2014-0009