The Network Concept of Strategic Management and Its Limitations / Sieciowa koncepcja zarządzania strategicznego i jej ograniczenia

• Authors: Kazimierz Krzakiewicz , Szymon Cyfert
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The purpose of the article is to contribute to the discussion on the network concept of strategic management and the limitations thereof. The article opens with a presentation of the origin of the concept of network organizations, which further on allows the author to discuss the concept of networks in strategic management, pinpoint its limitations and assess the validity of the assumption that a new paradigm of the strategic management theory is emerging.

Keywords

EN

the concept of network organization; strategic management

PL

koncepcja organizacji sieciowej; zarządzanie strategiczne

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Management
• Year: 2013
• Volume: 17
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 19-30

Dates

published

2013-05-01

online

2013-05-31

Contributors

author

Kazimierz Krzakiewicz

• Poznań University of Economics

author

Szymon Cyfert

• Poznań University of Economics

References

• 1. Bowman E. H. (2000), Strategy Change: Possible Worlds and Actual Minds, Harper & Row, New York.
• 2. Dyer J. H., Singh H., (2004), The Relational View: Cooperative Strategyand Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage, “Academy of Management Review”, Vol. 23 (4), s. 660-679.
• 3. Eccles R. G. (1981), The quasi firm in the construction industry, “Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization”, Vol. 2 (4) s. 335-357.
• 4. Gomes- Casseres B. (2006), The Alliance Revolution: The New Shape ofBusiness Rivalry, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
• 5. Jones C., Hesterly W. S., Borgatti S. P. (2007), A general theory of networkgovernance: Exchange conditions and social mechanisms, “Academy of Management Review”, Vol. 22 (4), s. 911-945.
• 6. Kanter R. M. (1994), Collaborative Advantage: The Art of Alliances, “Harvard Business Review”, Vol. 72 (4), s. 96-108.
• 7. Lowendahl B., Revand O. (1998), Challenges to Existing Strategy Theoryin a Postindustrial Society, “Strategic Management Journal”, Vol. 19 (8), s. 755-774.[Crossref]
• 8. Moore B. (1995), The Death of Competition: Leadership and Strategy in the Ageof Business Ecosystems, Harper Collins, New York.
• 9. Niemczyk J., Stańczyk-Hugiet E., Jasiński B. (2012), Sieci międzyorganizacyjne. Współczesne wyzwanie dla teorii i praktyki zarządzania, C.H. Beck, Warszawa.
• 10. Powell T. C. (2008), The Philosophy of Strategy, “Strategic Management Journal”, Vol. 23 ( 9), s. 873-880.
• 11. Prahalad C. K., Hamel G. (1994), Strategy as a Fields of Study: Why Searchfor a New Paradigm?, “Strategic Management Journal”, Vol. 15 (Summer special issue), s. 5-16.
• 12. Romanowska M. (1997), Alianse strategiczne przedsiębiorstw, PWE, Warszawa.
• 13. Taylor B. (1995), The New Strategic Leadership - Driving Change, GettingResults, “Long Range Planning”, Vol. 28 (5), s. 71- 81.[Crossref]
• 14. Venkatraman N., Subramaniam M. (2002), Theorizing the Future of Strategy:Questions for Shaping Strategy Research in the Knowledge Economy, Sage Publications, London.
• 15. Volberda H. W. (2003), Strategic Flexibility: Creating Dynamic CompetitiveAdvantage, Oxford University Press, New York.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/manment-2013-0002