Processing of Words Related to the Demands of a Previously Solved Problem

• Authors: Marek Kowalczyk
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Earlier research by the author brought about findings suggesting that people in a special way process words related to demands of a problem they previously solved, even when they do not consciously notice this relationship. The findings concerned interference in the task in which the words appeared, a shift in affective responses to them that depended on sex of the participants, and impaired memory of the words. The aim of this study was to replicate these effects and to find out whether they are related to working memory (WM) span of the participants, taken as a measure of the individual’s ability to control attention. Participants in the experimental group solved a divergent problem, then performed an ostensibly unrelated speeded affective classification task concerning each of a series of nouns, and then performed an unexpected cued recall task for the nouns. Afterwards, a task measuring WM span was administered. In the control group there was no problem-solving phase. Response latencies for words immediately following problem-related words in the classification task were longer in the experimental than in the control group, but there was no relationship between this effect and WM span. Solving the problem, in interaction with sex of the participants and, independently, with their WM span, influenced affective responses to problem-related words. Recall of these words, however, was not impaired in the experimental group.

Keywords

EN

task-irrelevant processing; interference; inhibition; working memory span

• Publisher: Committee for Psychological Sciences, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Journal: Polish Psychological Bulletin
• Year: 2014
• Volume: 45
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 179-191

Dates

published

2014-06-01

online

2014-06-17

Contributors

author

Marek Kowalczyk

• Institute of Psychology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Szamarzewskiego 89, 60-568 Poznań, Poland

References

• Bock, M., & Klinger, E. (1986). Interaction of emotion and cognition in word recall. Psychological Research, 48, 99-106.[Crossref]
• Conway, R.A., Kane, M.J., Bunting, M.F., Hambrick, D.Z., Wilhelm, O., Engle, R.W. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 769-786.[Crossref]
• Engle, R.W., & Kane, M.J. (2004). Executive attention, working memory capacity, and a two-factor theory of cognitive control. In B. Ross (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 44, pp. 145-199). NY: Elsevier.
• Fenske, M.J., Raymond, J.E., & Kunar, M.A. (2004). The affective consequences of visual attention in preview search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1055-1061.[Crossref][PubMed]
• Ferguson, M.J., & Bargh, J.A. (2004). Liking is for doing: The effects of goal pursuit on automatic evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 557-572.
• Friedman, N.P., & Miyake, A. (2004). The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 101-135.
• Frischen, A., Ferrey, A.E., Burt, D.H.R., Pistchik, M., & Fenske, M.J. (2012). The affective consequences of cognitive inhibition: devaluation or neutralization? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 169-179.[WoS][Crossref]
• Graf, P., Squire, L.R., & Mandler, G. (1984). The information that amnesic patients do not forget. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 164-178.
• Jacoby, L.L. (1991). A process-dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-541.[Crossref]
• Jacoby, L.L., Yonelinas, A.P., & Jennings, J. (1997). The relation between conscious and unconscious (automatic) influences: A declaration of independence. In J. Cohen & J.W. Schooler (Eds.), Scientific approaches to consciousness (s. 13-47). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
• Kane, M.J., & Engle, R.W. (2000). Working-memory capacity, proactive interference, and divided attention: Limits on long-term memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 336-358.
• Kane, M.J., & Engle, R.W. (2003). Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 47-70.
• Kane, M.J., Brown, L.H., McVay, J.C., Silvia, P.J., Myin-Germeys, I., & Kwapil, T.R. (2007). For whom the mind wanders, and when. An experience-sampling study of working memory and executive control in daily life. Psychological Science, 18, 614-621.[Crossref][PubMed]
• Kane, M.J., Conway, A.R.A., Hambrick, D.Z., & Engle, R.W. (2007). Variation in working memory capacity as variation in executive attention and control. In A.R.A. Conway, C. Jarrold, M.J. Kane, A. Miyake, & J.N. Towse (Eds.), Variation in working memory (pp. 21-48). New York: Oxford University Press.
• Klinger, E. (1975). Consequences of commitment to and disengagement from incentives. Psychological Review, 82, 1-25.
• Klinger, E. (1978). Modes of normal conscious flow. In G.E. Schwartz & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation: Scientific investigations into the flow of human experience (pp. 225-258). New York: Plenum.
• Klinger, E. (1996). The contents of thoughts: Interference as the downside of adaptive normal mechanisms in thought flow. In I.G. Sarason, B.R. Sarason, & G.R. Pierce (Eds.) Cognitive interference: Theories, methods, and findings (pp. 3-23). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Kolańczyk, A. (2008). Wpływ samokontroli na wartościowanie treści związanych z zadaniem [The effect of self-control on evaluation of meanings related to a task]. Czasopismo Psychologiczne, 14, 201-214.
• Kowalczyk, M. (1999). Efekt pogorszenia pamiętania treści związanych z wymogami problemu a hipoteza przedświadomej selekcji pomysłów [Impaired recall of problem-related words and the hypothesis of preconscious selection of solution ideas]. Czasopismo Psychologiczne, 5, 109-127.
• Kowalczyk, M. (2006). Memory for words related to demands of a problem solved prior to encoding: An investigation into inhibitory mechanisms of defence against distraction. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 37, 154-171.
• Kowalczyk, M. (2007). Myśli oderwane od zadania. Geneza dystrakcji i mechanizmy obrony. [ Task-unrelated thoughts. The origins of distraction and mechanisms of defence]. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.
• Lustig, C., May, C.P., Hasher, L. (2001). Working memory span and the role of proactive interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 199-207.
• Martin, L.L., & Tesser, A. (1996). Some ruminative thoughts. In R.S. Wyer, Jr. (Ed.), Ruminative Thoughts. Advances in Social Cognition (Vol. 9, pp. 1-47). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
• McCabe, D.P., Roediger III, H.L., & Karpicke, J.D. (2011). Automatic processing influences free recall: converging evidence from the process dissociation procedure and remember-know judgments. Memory & Cognition, 39, 389-402.[Crossref][WoS]
• McVay, J.C., & Kane, M.J. (2009). Conducting the train of thought: working memory capacity, goal neglect, and mind wandering in an executive-control task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 35, 196-204.[WoS]
• McVay, J.C., & Kane, M.J. (2010). Does mind wandering reflect executive function or executive failure? Comment on Smallwood and Schooler (2006) and Watkins (2008). Psychological Bulletin, 136, 188-197.[WoS]
• McVay, J.C., & Kane, M.J. (2012). Why does working memory capacity predict variation in reading comprehension? On the influence of mind wandering and executive attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 302-320.[WoS]
• Nikula, R., Klinger, E., & Larson-Gutman, M.K. (1993). Currrent concerns and electrodermal activity: Responses to words and thoughts. Journal of Personality, 61, 63-84.
• Pashler, H., & Shiu, L.-P. (1999). Do images involuntarily trigger search? A test of Pillsbury’s hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 445-448.[Crossref]
• Ratcliff, R. (1993). Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 510-532.
• Raymond, J.E., Fenske, M.J., & Tavassoli, N.T. (2003). Selective attention determines emotional responses to novel visual stimuli. Psychological Science, 14, 537-542.[Crossref][PubMed]
• Raymond, J.E., Fenske, M.J., & Westoby, N. (2005). Emotional devaluation of distracting patterns and faces: A consequence of attentional inhibition during visual search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 1404-1415.[Crossref]
• Redick, T.S., Heitz, R.P., & Engle, R.W. (2007). Working memory capacity and inhibition: Cognitive and social consequences. In D.S. Gorfein & C.M. MacLeod (Eds.), Inhibition in cognition (pp. 125-142). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
• Riemann, B.C., & McNally, R.J. (1995). Cognitive processing of personally-relevant information. Cognition & Emotion, 9, 325-340.[Crossref]
• Rosen, V.M., & Engle, R.W. (1998). Working memory capacity and suppression. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 418-436.[Crossref]
• Shiffrin, R.M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127-190.
• Szymańska, B., & Kolańczyk, A. (2002). Zmiana afektywnego znaczenia pojęć w kontekście zadania w przypadku osób twórczych i nietwórczych [Modification of the affective meaning of words in the context of task in case of high and low levels of creativity]. Studia Psychologiczne, XL, 151-160.
• Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychology, 26, 1-12.[Crossref]
• Turner, M.L., Engle, R.W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127-154.[Crossref]
• Unsworth, N. (2007). Individual differences in working memory capacity and episodic retrieval: Examining the dynamics of delayed and continuous distractor free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 1020-1034.
• Unsworth, N., & Brewer, G.A. (2010). Variation in working memory capacity and intrusions: Differences in generation or editing? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22, 990-1000.[WoS][Crossref]
• Unsworth, N., & Engle, R.W. (2007). The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: active maintenance in primary meomory and controlled search from secondary memory. Psychological Review, 114, 104-132.[Crossref][WoS][PubMed]
• Unsworth, N., & McMillan, B.D. (2012). Mind wandering and reading comprehension: Examining the roles of working memory capacity, interest, motivation, and topic experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 832-842.[WoS]
• Unsworth, N., Brewer, G.A., & Spillers, G.J. (2010). Variation in working memory capacity and forgetting over both the short and the long term: An application of the Population Dilution model. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23, 243-255.[WoS]
• Unsworth, N., Heitz, R.P., & Engle, R.W. (2005). Working memory capacity in hot and cold cognition. In R.W. Engle, G. Sedek, U. von Hecker, D.N. McIntosh (Eds.) Cognitive limitations in aging and psychopathology (pp. 19-43). New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Unsworth, N., Heitz, R.P., Schrock, J.C., & Engle, R.W. (2005). An automated version of the operation span task. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 498-505.
• Veling, H., Holland, R.W., & van Knippenberg, A. (2007). Devaluation of distracting stimuli. Cognition and Emotion, 21, 442-448.[Crossref]
• Whelan, R. (2008). Effective analysis of reaction time data. The Psychological Record, 58, 475-482.
• Yonelinas, A.P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 441-517. [WoS][Crossref]

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/ppb-2014-0023