“I can’t speak German so I can’t communicate with them”: Language use in intergroup contact between Czechs and Germans

• Authors: Magda Petrjánošová
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The aim of this article is to present empirical findings about language use and attitudes in intergroup contact from one of the European borderlands along the former Iron Curtain more than twenty years after it fell. The data was collected as part of an international research project Intergroup attitudes and intergroup contact in five Central European countries, which concentrates on the interplay of intergroup contact and perceptions between members of neighbouring nations in the border regions of the Czech Republic and each of the neighbouring states-Slovakia, Poland, Austria and Germany. The main data collection method used is an online questionnaire with different attitude and evaluation scales, as well as a feeling thermometer of emotional relations and open statements (N=2900). In this text I use thematic and basic critical discursive analysis only on the open statements from the Czech (N=210) and German (N=152) borderlands about the situations of contact and the following evaluation of the Others. I show how the linguistic competence and also the interest in the language of the Other are distributed very unevenly; the implicit norm almost always being that the Czechs should speak German. Of course, this situation has in some cases strong emotional consequences.

Keywords

EN

Czechs; Germans; intergroup contact; language use; attitudes

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Human Affairs
• Year: 2012
• Volume: 22
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 69-78

Dates

published

2012-01-01

online

2012-01-13

Contributors

author

Magda Petrjánošová

• Slovak Academy of Sciences

References

• [1] Allport, G. W. (1954). The Nature of Prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
• [2] Brown, R., Eller, A., Leeds, S., Stace, K. (2007). Intergroup contact and intergroup attitudes: A Longitudinal Study. European Journal of Social Psychology 37, 692–703. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.384[Crossref]
• [3] Carli, A., Guardiano, C., Kaučič-Baša, M., Sussi, E., Tessarolo, M., Ussai, M. (2003). Asserting Ethnic Identity and Power through Language. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 29(5), 853–883. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369183032000149613[Crossref]
• [4] Dixon, J., Durrheim, K., Tredoux, C. (2005). Beyond the Optimal Contact Strategy. A Reality Check for the Contact Hypothesis. American Psychologist 60(7), 697–711. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.7.697[Crossref]
• [5] Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., Kawakami, K. (2003). Intergroup Contact: The Past, Present, and the Future. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 6(1), 5–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1368430203006001009[Crossref]
• [6] Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. Selected Essays by Clifford Greetz. Basic Books: New York.
• [7] Holly, W., Nekvapil, J., Scherm, I., Tišerová, P. (2003). Unequal Neighbours: Coping with Asymmetries. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 29(5), 819–834. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369183032000149587[Crossref]
• [8] Keupp, H., Ahbe, T., Gmür, W., Höfer, R., Mitzscherlich, B., Kraus, W., Straus, F. (1999). Identitätsko nstruktionen. Das Patchwork der Identitäten in der Spätmoderne. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag.
• [9] Lášticová, B., Petrjánošová, M. (in press). Social Identities, Societal Change and Mental Borders. An Empirical Study of Identity Construction Strategies in Young Slovaks Commuting between Bratislava and Vienna. In T. Magioglou (Ed.). Culture and Political Psychology: a Societal Perspective. Greenwich: InfoAge Publishers.
• [10] Meinhof, U., Armbruster, H., Rollo, C. (2003). Final Report: Discourse - Changing Identity, Changing Nations, Changing Stories in European Border Communities. Available at ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/citizens/docs/ok_hiep_hpsect_99_00003_final_border_discourse.pdf
• [11] Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup Contact Theory. Annual Review Psychology 49, 65–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.65[Crossref]

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/s13374-012-0007-2