Introductory: New media and civic participation in Central Eastern Europe

• Authors: Magda Petrjánošová
• Languages of publication: EN
• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Human Affairs
• Year: 2014
• Volume: 24
• Issue: 4
• Pages: 399-405

Dates

published

2014-10-01

online

2014-10-02

Contributors

author

Magda Petrjánošová

• Slovak Academy of Sciences

References

• [1] Boase, J. et al. (2006). The strength of internet ties: The internet and email aid users in maintaining their social networks and provide pathways to help when people face big decisions. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Downloaded March 3, 2009 from www.pewinternet.org
• [2] Boyd, D. (2001). Sexing the Internet: Reflections on the role of identification in online communities. Presented at the conference Sexualities, Medias, Technologies, 21.–22. 6. 2001 at University of Surrey. Downloaded August 8, 2007 from http://www.danah.org/papers/SexingTheInternet.conference.pdf
• [3] Bútorová, Z., & Gyárfášová, O. (2010). Občianska participácia: trendy, problémy, súvislosti [Civic participation: trends, problems, connections]. Sociológia, 42(5), 447–491.
• [4] Ellison, N. B., Steinfeld, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12,(4), article 1. Retrieved September 9, 2007 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue4/ellison.html
• [5] Graham, M. (2011). Time machines and virtual portals: The spatialities of the digital divide. Progress in Development Studies, 11(3), 211–227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/146499341001100303[Crossref]
• [6] Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/225469[Crossref]
• [7] Hargittai, E. (2007). Whose space? Differences among users and non-users of social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), article 14. http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/hargittai.html
• [8] International Telecommunication Union (2014). The world in 2014. ICT Facts and figures. Available online at http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/facts/ICTFactsFigures2014-e.pdf
• [9] Lee, R. C., & Wong, S. C. (Eds.). (2003). AsianAmerica.Net: Ethnicity, Nationalism and Cyberspace. New York: Routledge.
• [10] McKenna, K.Y., & Bargh, J.A. (1998). Coming out in the age of the internet: Identity “demarginalization” through virtual group participation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 681–694. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.681[Crossref]
• [11] Moorstedt, T., & Schrenk, J. (2009). Jetzikon. 50 Kultobjekte der Nullerjahre. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag.
• [12] Nie, N. H. (2001). Sociability, interpersonal relations, and the Internet: Reconciling conflicting findings. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 420–435. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00027640121957277[Crossref]
• [13] Petrjánošová, M. (2010). Konštruovanie osobnej identity vo virtuálnych prostrediach internet [Constructing personal identities in virtual environments of the internet]. Unpublished PhD thesis. Bratislava: FiF UK.
• [14] Petrjánošová, M., & Lšáticová, B. (2010). Ako sa vytvára komunita: slovenskí migranti a migrantky v írsku [Constructing community: Slovak migrants in Ireland]. In J. Plichtová (Ed.), Občianstvo, participácia a deliberácia na Slovensku: teória a realita [Citizenship, participation and deliberation in Slovakia: theory and practice] (pp. 537–567). Bratislava: Veda.
• [15] Plichtová, J. (2010). Vyznam politickej slobody a rovnosti: deliberačný potenciál občanov a občianok SR (The meaning of political freedom and equality: deliberative potential of Slovak citizens). In J. Plichtová (Ed.), Občianstvo, participácia a deliberácia na Slovensku: teória a realita [Citizenship, participation and deliberation in Slovakia: theory and practice] (pp.185–212). Bratislava: Veda SAV.
• [16] Prensky, M. (2001), September/October). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816[Crossref]
• [17] Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
• [18] Rheingold, H. (2000). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. London: MIT Press.
• [19] Rifkin, J. (2000). Access. Das Verschwinden des Eigentums. Frankfurt/Main: Campus.
• [20] Spannring, R. (2005). Some qualitative findings on young people’s attitudes towards political particiaption. In L. Macháček (Ed.), The Central European dimension of youth research (pp. 20–36). Trnava: Univerzita Cyrila a Metoda v Trnave.
• [21] Saunders, R. A. (2006). Denationalized digerati in the virtual near abroad: The internet’s paradoxical impact on national identity among minority Russians, Global Media and Communication 2; 43–69, downloaded 3.2.2009 from http://gmc.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/1/43 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1742766506061816[Crossref]
• [22] Šmahel, D. (2003). Komunikace adolescentu v prostředí internetu [Communication of adolescents online]. Československá psychologie, 47(2), 144–156.
• [23] Štetka, V., & Šmahel, D. (2009). Nová média v perspektivě sociálních věd [New media in the perspective of social sciences]. Sociální studia, 6(2), 7–11.
• [24] Turkle, S. (1997). Life on the screen. Identity in the age of Internet. London: Phoenix.
• [25] Zhao, S., Grasmuck, S., & Martin, J. (2008). Identity construction on Facebook: Digital empowerment in anchored relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1816–1836. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.012[Crossref][WoS]

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/s13374-014-0236-7