Parties, pirates and politicians: The 2014 European Parliamentary elections on Czech Twitter

• Authors: Matouš Hrdina , Zuzana Karaščáková
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The ongoing expansion of new communication technologies is inseparably linked to the transformation of political communication. The new thinking behind communication is embedded directly in the code of popular social networks. Can a formal political party successfully implement a decentralized mode of communication based on personal connections and weak social ties, or is it against the very logic of both the hierarchical organizations and the technology itself? Our case study describes the vast spectrum of various types of behavior of political actors on Twitter through computer-assisted analysis of Twitter communication in Czech Republic before the elections to the European Parliament in May 2014. The research is based on the concept of connective action, as defined by Bennett and Segerberg. Preliminary results show an emerging typology of campaign strategies, from formal and centralized campaigns on one hand to various hybrid overlaps of traditional and new forms of communication on the other.

Keywords

EN

connective action; European elections; Twitter analysis; Czech politics; political communication

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Human Affairs
• Year: 2014
• Volume: 24
• Issue: 4
• Pages: 437-451

Dates

published

2014-10-01

online

2014-10-02

Contributors

author

Matouš Hrdina

• Charles University in Prague

author

Zuzana Karaščáková

• Charles University in Prague

References

• [1] Babiš, A. (2014). Twitter account. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/AndrejBabis
• [2] Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661[Crossref]
• [3] Bogost, I. (2012). Alien phenomenology, or what it’s like to be a thing. London, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
• [4] Boyd, D., Golder, S, & Lotan, G. (2010). Tweet, tweet, retweet: Conversational aspect of retweeting on twitter. 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1–10).
• [5] Bruns, A., & Burgess, J. E. (2011). #Ausvotes: how Twitter covered the 2010 Australian federal election. Communication, Politics and Culture, 44(2), 37–56.
• [6] Bruns, A. (2012). How long is a tweet? Mapping dynamic conversation networks on Twitter using Gawk and Gephi. Information, Communication, & Society, 15(9), 1323–1351. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.635214[Crossref]
• [7] Bruns, A., & Stieglitz, S. (2012). Quantitative approaches to comparing communication patterns on twitter. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 30,(3-4), 160–185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2012.744249[Crossref]
• [8] Castells, M. (2012). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the internet age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
• [9] CVVM. (2014). Citizens about the European Parliament elections - May 2014 (press release in Czech). Retrieved from http://cvvm.soc.cas.cz/media/com_form2content/documents/c1/a7233/f3/pv140519.pdf
• [10] Czech Statistical Office. (2014). Elections to the European Parliament. Retrieved from http://volby.cz/pls/ep2014/ep?xjazyk=EN
• [11] Dahlgren, P. (2009). Media and political engagement: Citizens, communication, and democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• [12] Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. New York: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199970773.001.0001[Crossref]
• [13] Dijck, J., & Poell, T. (2013). Understanding social media logic. Media and Communication, 1(1), 2–14.
• [14] Dotey, A., Rom, H., & Vaca, C. (2011). Information diffusion in social media. Stanford University. Retrieved from http://snap.stanford.edu/class/cs224w-2011/proj/mrom_Finalwriteup_v1.pdf
• [15] Falkvinge, R. (2013). Swarmwise: The tactical manual to changing the world. Retrieved from http://falkvinge.net/files/2013/04/Swarmwise-2013-by-Rick-Falkvinge-v1.1-2013Sep01.pdf
• [16] Gibson, R., Nixon, P., & Ward, S. (Eds.). (2003). Political parties and the internet: Net gain? London, New York: Routledge.
• [17] Hansen, L. D., Schneiderman, B., & Smith. A. M. (2011). Analyzing social media networks with NodeXL: Insights from a connected world. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.
• [18] Chadwick, A. (2006). Internet politics: States, citizens, and new communication technologies. New York: Oxford University Press.
• [19] Katz, S. R., & Mair, P. (1995). Changing models of party organization and party democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party. Party Politics, 1(1), 5–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1354068895001001001[Crossref]
• [20] Kelly, K. (2010). What technology wants. New York: Viking Books.
• [21] Larsson, O. A., & Moe, H. (2012). Studying political microblogging: Twitter users in the 2010 Swedish election campaign. New Media, 14 (5), 729–747. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444811422894[Crossref][WoS]
• [22] Latour, B. (2007). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
• [23] Leavitt, A., Burchard, E., Fisher, D., & Gilbert, A. (2009). The influentials: New approaches for analyzing influence on twitter. Retrieved from http://www.webecologyproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/influence-report-final.pdf
• [24] Margolis, M., & Moreno-Riao, G. (2009). The prospect of internet democracy. Farnham, Burlington: Ashgate.
• [25] Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. London: Viking.
• [26] Poell, T., & Borra, E. (2012). Twitter, YouTube, and Flickr as platforms of alternative journalism: The social media account of the 2010 Toronto G20 protests. Journalism, 13(6), 695–713. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1464884911431533[Crossref]
• [27] Pool, S. I. (1983). Technologies of freedom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• [28] Probst, A. (2013). Twitter in Czech Republic - April 2013. Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/andrej_probst/twitter-in-czech-republic-april-2013
• [29] Ratkiewicz, J. et al. (2010). Detecting and tracking the spread of astroturf memes in microblog streams. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/pdf/1011.3768.pdf
• [30] Rheingold, H. (2002). Smart mobs: The next social revolution. Cambridge: Basic Books.
• [31] Shirky, C. (2008). Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations. New York: Penguin Press.
• [32] Schneider, M. S., & Foot, K. (2005). Web sphere analysis: An approach to studying online action. In Ch. Hine (Ed.), Virtual methods: Issues in social research on the internet (pp. 157–170). Oxford: Berg Publishers.
• [33] Siapera, E. (2012). Understanding new media. Los Angeles: Sage.
• [34] Smith, M. A., Rainie, L., Himelboim, I., & Shneiderman, B. (2014). Mapping twitter topic networks: From polarized crowds to community clusters. Pew Research Internet Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/02/20/mapping-twitter-topic-networks-from-polarized-crowds-to-community-clusters/
• [35] Šulcová, H., & Švarcová, A. (2014). Five percent limit in the election is discriminatory, says the leader of the Czech Pirate Party (in Czech). Český rozhlas, Rádiožurnál. Retrieved from http://www.rozhlas.cz/radiozurnal/dvace
• [36] Transparency International Czech Republic. (2014). Monitoring of the political parties’ electoral campaigns (in Czech). Retrieved from http://www.transparentnivolby.cz/eu2014/kandidati/
• [37] Vergeer, M., Hermans, L., & Sams, S. (2011). Online social networks and micro-blogging in political campaigning: The exploration of a new campaign tool and a new campaign style. Party Politics, 19(3), 477–501. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1354068811407580[Crossref]
• [38] Winner, L. (1980). Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus, 109(1), 121–136.
• [39] Xenos, M., & Foot, A. K. (2005). Politics as usual, or politics unusual? Position taking and dialogue on campaign websites in the 2002 u.s. elections. Journal of Communication, 55(1), 169–185. www.klaboseni.czwww.smrfoundation.org http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb02665.x[Crossref]

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/s13374-014-0239-4