Gombrich and the Problem of Relativity of Vision

• Authors: Ladislav Kesner
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The essay argues that Ernst Gombrich's views are relevant to the critical examination of the notion of the relativity and historicity of vision which has been widely accepted as one of the central axioms shared by visual studies, art history and film studies.

Keywords

EN

Gombrich; vision; visuality; plasticity

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Human Affairs
• Year: 2009
• Volume: 19
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 266-273

Dates

published

2009-09-01

online

2009-09-24

Contributors

author

Ladislav Kesner

• Department of Art History, Masaryk University, Arne Nováka 1, 60200 Brno, Czech Republic

References

• Bal, M. Visual Essentialism and the Object of Visual Culture. Journal of Visual Culture 2, 1, 14, 2003.
• Baltes, P., Reuter-Lorenz, P., Rösler, F. Prologue: Biocultural Co-Constructivism as a Theoretical Metascript. In Baltes, Reuter-Lorenz, Rösler (Eds.). Lifespan Development and the Brain. The Perspective of Biocultural Co-Constructivism. Cambridge: 2006.
• Baxandall, M. Painting and Experience in Fifteenth-Century Italy. A Primer in the Social History of Pictorial Style. Oxford: Oxford University Press, esp. p. 29-40, 1972.
• Blais, C. et al. Culture Shapes How We Look at Faces. PloS ONE 3, 20, e3022, August 2008.
• Blakemore, S., J., Frith, U. How Does the Brain Deal with the Social World? Neuroreport 14, 1-10, 2003.
• Bryson, N. Vision and Painting: the Logic of the Gaze. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1983.
• Changeaux, J. P. The Physiology of Truth. Neuroscience and Human Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004.
• Chiao, J. et al. Cultural Specificity in Amygdala Response to Fear Faces. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20.12, 2008.[Crossref][WoS]
• Chua, H. et al. Cultural Variation in Eye Movements during Scene Perception. Proceeding Natl Acad Sci USA 102, 30 August 2005.[Crossref]
• Cohen, A. Many Forms of Culture. American Psychologist 64, 3, 194-204, 2009.[WoS][Crossref]
• Colzato L. S. et al. Losing the Big picture: How Religion May Control Visual Attention. PloS ONE 3, 12, e3679, November 2008.[WoS]
• Danto, A. C. Description and Phenomenology of Perception. In N. Bryson, M. A. Holly, K. Moxey (Eds.). Visual Theory. Painting and Interpretation. New York: Harper Collins, 1991.
• Danto, A. C. Beyond the Brillo Box. The Visual Arts in Post-Historical Perspective. New York: Noonday Press, 1992.
• Danto, A. C. The Historicity of the Eye. Seeing and Showing. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 39, 2001a.[Crossref]
• Danto, A. C. The Pigeon within Us All: A Reply to Three Critics. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 39, 2001b.[Crossref]
• Downey, G. Escaping Orientalism in Cultural Psychology.
• Fahle, M. Perceptual Learning and Sensory Plasticity. In L. Squire (Ed.). Encyclopedia of Neuroscience online. Elsevier, 523-533, 2009.
• Fodor, J. The Modulatity of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1983.
• Foster, H. Preface. In H. Foster (Ed.). Vision and Visuality. Seattle: Bay Press, 1988.
• Gombrich, E. H. Focus on the Arts and Humanities. In Tributes. Interpreters of Our Cultural Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984.
• Gombrich, E. H. Representation and Misrepresentation. Critical Inquiry 11, 195-201, 1984.[Crossref]
• Gombrich, E. H. "They Were All Human Beings-So Much Is Plain": Reflections on Cultural Relativism in the Humanities. Critical Inquiry 13, 1987.[Crossref]
• Gombrich, E. H. Art and Illusion. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000a.
• Gombrich, E. H. Concerning "the Science of Art". Commentary on Ramachandran and Hirstein. Journal of Consciousness Studies 7, 8-9, 2000b.
• Goodman, N. Languages of Art: An Approach to a Theory of Symbols. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1968.
• Gutchess, A. et al. Cultural differences in neural function associated with object processing. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience 6.2, 2006.
• Han, S., Northoff, G. Culture-sensitive Neural Substrates of Human Cognition: a Transcultural Neuroimaging Approach. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 9, 646-54, 2008.[WoS][Crossref][PubMed]
• Hofer, S. et al. Experience Leaves a Lasting Structural Trace in Cortical Circuits. Nature 12, online (doi:10.1038/nature07487), 2008.[WoS][Crossref]
• Krieger, M. The Ambiguities of Representation and Illusion: An E. H. Gombrich Retrospective. Critical Inquiry 11, 189-190, 1984.
• Nelson, R. Descartes's Cow and Other Domestications of the Visual. In R. Nelson (Ed.). Visuality Before and Beyond the Renaissance. Seeing as Others Saw. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
• Nelson, C. Neurobehavioral Development in the Context of Biocultural Co-Constructivism. In P. B. Baltes, P. Reuter-Lorenz, F. Rösler (Eds.). Lifespan Development and the Brain. The Perspective of Biocultural Co-Constructivism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.[WoS]
• Onians, J. Alberti and the Neuropsychology of Style. In L. Chiavoni, G. Ferlisi, M. V. Grossi (Eds.). Leon Battista Alberti E Il Quattrocento. Studi in onore di Cecil Grayson e Ernst Gombrich. Mantua 2001.
• Onians, J. Neuroarthistory. From Aristotle and Pliny to Baxandall and Zeki. New Haven-London: Yale University Press, 2007.
• Pächt, O. The Practice of Art History. Reflections on Method. London: Harvey Miller, 1999.
• Palmieri, T., Gauthier, I. Visual Object Understanding. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 5, 291-303, 2004.[Crossref]
• Panofsky, E. Perspektive als symbolische Form. In K. Michels, M. Warnke (Eds.). Erwin Panofsky. Deutschsprachige Aufsätze. Berlin 1998.
• Pinker, S. The Blank Slate. The Modern Denial of Human Nature. London: Allen Lane, 2002.[WoS]
• Ramachandran, V. S., Hirstein, W. The Science of Art. A Neurological Theory of Aesthetic Experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies 6, 6/7, 15-51, 1999.
• Segall, M. H., Campbell, D. T., Herskovits, M. J. The Influence of Culture on Visual Perception. Indianapolis, Ind.: Bobbs-Merril, 1966.
• Shu-Chan L. Biocultural Orchestration of Developmental Plasticity across Levels: The Interplay of Biology and Culture in Shaping the Mind and Behavior Across the Life Span. Psychological Bulletin 129, 2, 171-194, 2003.
• Wölfflin, H. Principles of Art History. The Problem of the Development of Style in Later Art. New York 1932.
• Woodfield, R. Ernst Gombrich and the Idea of Human Nature. Human Affairs 13, 163-170, 2003.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10023-009-0040-x