The influence of sentential context and frequency of occurrence on the recognition of words with scrambled letters

• Authors: Wiktor Paciorek , Joanna Rączaszek-Leonardi
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

In this paper we examine the "jumbled words" effect which denotes human ability to easily read words whose internal letters have been re-arranged as long as external letters remain in their positions. Hitherto, many explanations for this effect have focussed on the processes that operate "bottom-up". Here we suggest that "top-down" processes also play an important role and demonstrate this experimentally. First, we briefly describe the main types of word-recognition models and consider which model best explains the effect. Then, we present an experiment in which jumbled words of different frequency of occurrence were immersed in various types of contexts. Results indicate that both the frequency and semantic sentential context are involved in jumbled word recognition. The implications of these findings for word recognition models are discussed.

Keywords

EN

word recognition; "jumbled words"; "top-down" processing

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Psychology of Language and Communication
• Year: 2009
• Volume: 13
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 45-57

Dates

published

2009-01-01

online

2009-11-06

Contributors

author

Wiktor Paciorek

• University of Warsaw

author

Joanna Rączaszek-Leonardi

• University of Warsaw

References

• Coltheart, M. Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: a dual-route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.[PubMed][Crossref]
• Fodor, J. A. (1983). Modularity of mind: an essay on faculty psychology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
• Gleason, J. B. & Ratner, N. B. (Ed.) (1998; Polish edition: 2005). Psycholingwistyka. Gdańsk: GWP.
• Gough, P. B., Alford, J. A., & Holley-Wilcox, P. (1981). Words and contexts. In O. J. L. Tzeng & H. Singer (Eds.), Perception of print. Reading research in experimental psychology (pp. 85-102). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Grainger, J. (1990). Word Frequency and Neighborhood Frequency Effects in Lexical Decision and Naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 228-244.
• Grainger, J. & Whitney, C. (2004) Does the huamn mnid raed wrods as a wlohe?, Trends in Cognitive Science, 8, 58-59.
• Howes, D. H. & Solomon, R. L. (1951). Visual duration threshold as a function of word probability. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41, 401-410.[Crossref]
• Humphreys, G. W., Evett, L. J., & Quinlan, P. T. (1990). Orthographic processing in visual word identification. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 517-560.[PubMed][Crossref]
• Korpus jezyka polskiego PWN.
• McClelland, J. L. & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-405.
• Miller, G. A. (1951) Language and communication. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Simpson, G. B., Peterson, R. R., Casteel, M. A., & Burgess, C. (1989). Lexical and sentence context effects in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 88-97.[Crossref][WoS]
• Swinney, D. A. (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 120-136.
• Tabossi, P. (1988). Accessing lexical ambiguity in different types of sentential contexts. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 324-340.
• Whaley, C. P. (1978). Word-nonword classification time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 143-154.
• Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: the SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Buletin and Review, 8, 221-243.
• Velan, H., & Frost, R (2007). Cambridge University versus Hebrew University: The impact of letter transposition on Reading English and Hebrew. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14 (5), 913-918.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10057-009-0010-9