The superordination relation and the symmetry of verbal associations in selected parts of the mental lexicon

• Authors: Nawoja Mikołajczak-Matyja
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The paper discusses the role of the superordination relation in the semantic organization of the mental lexicon. The method of three consecutive free association tests (reactions from the previous test are stimuli in the next one, so lists of stimuli are prepared for each respondent separately) was used to determine the role of different kinds of semantic relations in building some fragments of the lexicon. A detailed semantic analysis made in 1200 recurrent (symmetrical) and non-recurrent "chains" built with associations given by 50 secondary school students (Polish language users) revealed the relative importance of the superordination relation as a factor connecting elements of the mental lexicon: the hyponymy/hyperonymy relation occurs more regularly in various lexicon parts than other paradigmatic relations.

Keywords

EN

mental lexicon; verbal associations; semantic relations; lexical relations; hyponymy

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Psychology of Language and Communication
• Year: 2010
• Volume: 14
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 15-35

Dates

published

2010-01-01

online

2010-12-22

Contributors

author

Nawoja Mikołajczak-Matyja

• Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań

References

• Aristotle (1844). Logique d'Aristote. Vol. 1: Catégories - Herméneia. Paris: Librairie de Ladrange.
• Berlin, B., Breedlove, D. E., & Raven, P. H. (1968). Covert categories and folk taxonomies. American Anthropologist, 70, 2, 290-299.[Crossref]
• Berlin, B., Breedlove, D. E., & Raven, P. H. (1973). General principles of classification and nomenclature in folk biology. American Anthropologist, 75, 1, 214-242.[Crossref]
• Berlin, B., Breedlove, D. E., & Raven, P. H. (1974). Principles of Tzeltal plant classification. New York, London: Academic Press.
• Bock, J. K. (2002). Meaning, sound, and syntax. Lexical priming in sentence production. In G. T. M. Altmann (Ed.), Psycholinguistics. Critical concepts in psychology. Vol. 5 (pp. 378-404). London, New York: Routledge.
• Cieślicka-Ratajczak, A. (1995). The mental lexicon in second language learning. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, 29, 105-117.
• Conklin, H. C. (1962). Lexicographical treatment of folk taxonomies. In F. W. Householder & S. Saporta (Eds.), Problems in lexicography (pp. 119-141). Bloomington: University of Indiana.
• Collins, A. M. & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407-428.[Crossref]
• Collins, A. M. & Quillian, M. R. (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 240-247.[Crossref]
• Cruse, D. A. (1995). Lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Cruse, D. A. (2000). Meaning in language. An introduction to semantics and pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.[WoS]
• Cruse, D. A. (2002). Hyponymy and its varieties. In R. Green, C. A. Bean, & S. H. Myaeng (Eds.), The semantics of relationships. An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 3-21). Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Fellbaum, Ch. (1999). A semantic network of English verbs. In Ch. Fellbaum (Ed.), WordNet. An electronic lexical database (pp. 69-104). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Ferrand, L. (2001). Normes d'associations verbales pour 260 mots "abstraits". L'Année Psychologique, 101, 4, 683-721.
• Ferrand, L. & Alario, F.-X. (1998). Normes d'associations verbales pour 366 noms d'objets concrets. L'Année Psychologique, 98, 4, 659-709.
• Forster, K. I. (2002). Accessing the mental lexicon. In G. T. M. Altmann (Ed.), Psycholinguistics. Critical concepts in psychology. Vol. 1 (pp. 270-296). London, New York: Routledge.
• Harley, T. (2003). The psychology of language. From data to theory. Hove, New York: Psychology Press.
• Hirsh, K. W. & Tree, J. J. (2001). Word association norms for two cohorts of british adults. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 14, 1, 1-44.[Crossref]
• Houde, O. (1990). Logical categorization: schematic knowledge, categorical knowledge, and image versus linguistic format. A study in six- to eleven-year-olds. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 10, 4, 343-384.
• Hörmann, H. (1972). Introduction à la psycholinguistique. Paris: Librairie Larousse.
• Hunca-Bednarska, A. (1997). Skojarzenia werbalne w schizofrenii (Verbal associations in schizophrenia). Lublin: Czelej.
• Johnson, D. E. & Shean, G. D. 1993. Word associations and schizophrenic symptoms. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 27, 1, 69-77.
• Kurcz, I. (1967). Polskie normy powszechności skojarzeń swobodnych na 100 słów z listy Kent-Rosanoffa (The Polish norms for free responses to 100 words from the Kent-Rosanoff word association test). Studia Psychologiczne, 8, 122-255.
• Kurcz, I. (1976). Psycholingwistyka (Psycholinguistics). Warszawa: PWN.
• Leech, G. (1987). Semantics. The study of meaning. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
• Latour, M. A. & McKelvie, S. J. (1994). Effects of type of input and type of processing on recall hypermnesia. Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale, 48, 3, 451-459.
• Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Łobacz, P. & Mikołajczak-Matyja, N. (2002). Skojarzenia słowne w psycholeksykologii i onomastyce psycholingwistycznej (Verbal associations in psycholexicology and in psycholinguistic onomastics). Poznań: Sorus.
• Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R., & Older, L. (2002). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. In G. T. M. Altmann (Ed.), Psycholinguistics. Critical concepts in psychology. Vol. 2 (pp. 17-83). London, New York: Routledge.
• Medin, D. L. & Atran, A. (1999). Introduction. In D. L. Medin & S. Atran (Eds.), Folkbiology (pp. 1-15). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Murphy, M. L. (2003). Semantic relations and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Mikołajczak-Matyja, N. (2004). Skojarzenia słowne niewidomych i widzących użytkowników języka polskiego - studium porównawcze (Verbal associations of blind and sighted users of the Polish language - a comparative study). Investigationes Linguisticae, 11, 1-17. Retrieved from: www.inveling.amu.edu.pl
• Mikołajczak-Matyja, N. (2008). Hierarchiczna struktura leksykonu umysłowego. Relacje semantyczne w leksykonie widzących i niewidomych użytkowników języka (The hierarchical structure of the mental lexicon. Semantic relations in the lexicon of sighted and blind language users). Poznań: UAM.
• Miller, G. A. & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1976). Language and perception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Moss, H. E., McCormick, S. F., & Tyler L. K. (2002). The time course of activation of semantic information during spoken word recognition. In: G. T. M. Altmann (Ed.), Psycholinguistics. Critical concepts in psychology. Vol. 2 (pp. 84-119). London, New York: Routledge.
• Moss, H. E., Ostrin, R. K., Tyler, L. K., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1995). Accessing different types of lexical semantic information: evidence from priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 4, 863-883.
• Pogonowski, J. (1991). Hiponimia (Hyponymy). Poznań: UAM.
• Quillian, M. R. (1968). Semantic memory. In M. L. Minsky (Ed.), Semantic information processing (pp. 227-270). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Sowa, J. F. (2000). Knowledge representation. Pacific Grove, Albany, London, Toronto: Brooks/Cole.
• Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In E. Tulving, & W. Donaldson (Eds.), Organization of memory (pp. 380-402). New York: Academic Press.
• Ungerer, F. & Schmid, H-J. (1996). An introduction to cognitive linguistics. London, New York: Longman.
• Upmanyu, V. V., Bhardwaj, S., & Singh, S. (1996). Word-association emotional indicators: associations with anxiety, psychoticism, neuroticism, extraversion, and creativity. The Journal of Social Psychology, 136, 4, 521-529.[Crossref]
• Vigliocco, G. & Vinson, D. P. 2007. Semantic representation. In. M. G. Gaskell (Ed.), Psycholinguistics (pp. 195-215). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Wilks, C. & Meara, P. (2002). Untangling word webs: graph theory and the notion of density in second language word association networks. Second Language Research, 18, 4, 303-324.
• Wolter, B. (2002). Assessing proficiency through word associations: is there still hope? System, 3, 3, 315-329.
• Wunderlich, D. (2006). Introduction: What the study of the lexicon is about. In D. Wunderlich (Ed.), Advances in the theory of the lexicon (pp. 1-25). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
• Wyver, S. R., Markham, R., & Hlavacek, S. (2000). Inferences and word associations of children with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 94, 204-217.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10057-010-0008-3