The Right to Privacy and Private Detective Activities in Lithuania

• Authors: Mindaugas Bilius
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Private detectives have been providing their services in Lithuania for about a decade; however, only now has the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania started to discuss whether it is expedient and necessary to regulate the activities of private detectives by means of a separate law. One of the goals of a separate legal regulation of private detective activities is the protection of human rights, particularly the right to privacy. This article examines the provisions of national and international legislative acts related to the private life of a person, and assesses the opportunities of a private detective to provide private detective services without prejudice to the provisions of applicable legislative acts. The article concludes that a private detective is not an authorized (public) authority and there is no possibility to assess in each case whether the interests of a person using the services of private detectives are more important than those of other persons, which would allow for violating their rights to private life. The limits of an individual’s right to privacy can only be narrowed by a particular person, giving consent to making public the details of his/her private life. It is the only opportunity for a private detective to gather information related to the private life of a citizen. Currently applicable legislative acts in Lithuania do not provide for opportunities for private subjects to collect personal data without that person’s consent. This right is granted only to public authorities and with the court’s permission

Keywords

EN

Right to privacy; private detective; private detective services; personal data

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Baltic Journal of Law & Politics
• Year: 2012
• Volume: 5
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 1-26

Dates

published

2012-12-01

online

2013-02-08

Contributors

author

Mindaugas Bilius

• Faculty of Law, Vytautas Magnus University, (Lithuania), Ozeskienės str. 18, Kaunas 44254, Lithuania

References

• 1. “An international survey of privacy laws and developments. Privacy & Human Rights 2002” // http://www.privacyinternational.org/survey/phr2002/phr2002-part1.pdf (accessed April 29, 2011).
• 2. Civilka, Mindaugas. Asmens duomenų apsauga Tarptautinėje ir EB teisėje(The protection of personal data in the international and EU law). Vilnius: Vilniaus universiteto Teisės fakultetas, 2001 // http://www.teisininkas.lt/downloads/ADA_1.12.pdf (accessed April 20, 2011).
• 3. Jočienė, Danutė, and Kęstutis Čilinskas. Žmogaus teisių apsaugos problemostarptautinėje ir Lietuvos Respublikos teisėje (The problems of the protectionof human rights in the international and Lithuanian law). Vilnius: Teisės projektų ir tyrimų centras, 2005.
• 4. Jočienė, Danutė, and Kęstutis Čilinskas. Žmogaus teisių apsaugos problemostarptautinėje ir Lietuvos Respublikos teisėje (The problems of the protectionof human rights in the international and Lithuanian law). Vilnius: UAB “Petro ofsetas”, 2004.
• 5. Jovaišas, Karolis. “Informacijos apie privatų žmogaus gyvenimą rinkimo teisėtumo kriterijai” (The criteria of the legality of the collection of information about the private life of a person). Teisės problemos T. 44, No. 2 (2004): 48-65.
• 6. Mikelėnas, Valentinas. “Teisė į privatų gyvenimą ir jos gynimas” (The right to private life and its protection): 52-113. In: Danutė Petrauskienė, ed. Asmeninės neturtinės teisės ir jų gynimas (Personal non-property rights andthe defence of them). Vilnius: Justitia, 2001.
• 7. Warren, Samuel D., and Louis D. Brandeis. “The Right to Privacy.” HarvardLaw Review Vol. IV, No. 5 (December, 1890) // http://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/classes/6.805/articles/privacy/Privacy_brand_warr2.html4 (accessed May 9, 2011).
• 8. Žmogaus teisių stebėjimo institutas. Privataus gyvenimo ribojimaselektroninių ryšių srityje nusikaltimų tyrimo tikslais: problemos ir galimisprendimai (The restraints of privacy in the area of electronic communicationsfor the purpose of crime investigation: problems and decisions). 2005 // http://www.hrmi.lt/uploaded/PDF%20dokai/Priv_gyvenimo_ribojimas_el_rysiu_srityje_tiriant_nus20050227_web.pdf (accessed May 9, 2011).
• 1. Administrative Code of the Republic of Lithuania. Official Gazette, 1985, no. 1-1.
• 2. Alana Shoars v. Epson America, Inc. United States Court of Appeal of the State of California, Second Appellate District Division, 1994, No. B073234.
• 3. Auto nº 262/1988 de Tribunal Constitucional, Sección 2ª, 29 de Febrero de 1988 (Spanish case).
• 4. Bathurst City Council v. Saban. Supreme Court of New South Wales, 1985, 2 NSWLR 704 (Australian case).
• 5. Bernstein of Leigh v. Skyviews & General Ltd. 1978, 1 QB 479 (UK case).
• 6. Bourke v. Nissan Motor Corp. Cal. Ct. App., 1993, No. B068705.
• 7. Civil Code of the Republic of Lithuania. Official Gazette, 2000, no. VIII-1864.
• 8. Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Lithuania. Official Gazette, 2002, no. 37-1341.
• 9. Decision of the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania, 2011, No. N62-902/2011.
• 10. Dėl elektroninės komunikacijos sekimo darbo vietoje (On the surveillance ofelectronic communications in the workplace). Darbo grupės darbinis dokumentas (Workgroup document) (May 29, 2002), No. 5401/01/EN/Galutinis, WP 55 // http://www.ada.lt/images/cms/File/wp%2055.pdf (accessed April 14, 2011).
• 11. European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Official Gazette, 1995, no. 40-987.
• 12. Flanagan v. Epson America, Inc. Cal. Super. Ct., 1990, No. BC 007036.
• 13. International Labour Organization Code of Practice “Protection of Workers’Personal Data” (January 1, 1997) // http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_protect/---protrav/---safework/documents/normativeinstrument/wcms_107797.pdf (accessed December 9, 2011).
• 14. Law of the Republic of Lithuania on Equal Opportunities. Official Gazette, 1998, no. 112-3100.
• 15. Law on Legal Protection of Personal Data of the Republic of Lithuania. Official Gazette, 1996, no. 63-1479; 2008, no. 22-804.
• 16. Law on Operational Activities of the Republic of Lithuania. Official Gazette, 2002, no.IX-965 (as amended on June 30, 2010).
• 17. Michael A. Smyth v. The Pillsbury Company. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, 1996, C.A. NO. 95-5712.
• 18. Niemietz v. Federal Republic of Germany. Eur. Ct. H.R., 1992, Series A, No. 251.
• 19. On the compliance of article 3 (wording of 26 June 2001), article 4 (wordingsof 26 June 2001 and 3 April 2003), paragraph 3 of article 6 (wording of 26June 2001) and paragraph 1 of article 8 (wording of 26 June 2001) of theRepublic of Lithuania law on the retraint of organised crime with theConstitution of the Republic of Lithuania. Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania (December 29, 2004), Official Gazette, 2005, no. 1-7.
• 20. On the compliance of article 42 of the Republic of Lithuania law on the realproperty register (wording of 21 June 2001) with the Constitution of theRepublic of Lithuania and on the compliance of item 88 (wording of 27February 2007) and item 97 (wordings of 27 February 2007, 22 October2008, 3 March 2010, and 4 May 2011) of the regulations of the real property register approved by resolution of the government of the Republic of LithuaniaNO. 1129 "on the approval of the regulations of the real property register" of12 July 2002 with the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania. Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania (June 9, 2011), Case no.12/2008-45/2009.
• 21. On the compliance of Articles 5 and 10 of the Law of the Republic of Lithuaniaon State Secrets and their Protection with the Constitution of the Republic ofLithuania as well as on the compliance of the 6 March 1996 Resolutions No.309 and 310 of the Government of the Republic of Lithuania with theConstitution of the Republic of Lithuania and the norms of the Republic ofLithuania Code of Civil Proceedings. Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania (December 19, 1996), Official Gazette, 1996, no. 126-2962.
• 22. On the compliance of items 12, 14 and 16 of the procedure for control ofinformation not to be divulged to the public and dissemination of limitedpublic information stored in public use computer networks as confirmed byresolution of the government of the Republic of Lithuania no. 290 "on theconfirmation of the procedure for control of information not to be divulged tothe public and dissemination of limited public information stored in public usecomputer networks" of 5 March 2003 with the Constitution of the Republic ofLithuania and paragraph 1 (wording of 29 August 2000) of article 53 of theRepublic of Lithuania law on the provision of information to the public. Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania (September 19, 2005), Official Gazette, 2005, no. 113-4131.
• 23. On the compliance of paragraph 2 of article 27 of the Republic of Lithuanialaw on telecommunications (wording of 11 July 2000), paragraph 1 of article 2of the Republic of Lithuania law on the amendment of article 27 of the law ontelecommunications, paragraph 4 of article 57 of the Republic of Lithuania lawon telecommunications (wording of 5 July 2002), item 4 of paragraph 3 ofarticle 7 of the Republic of Lithuania law on operational activities (wording of22 May 1997), item 6 of paragraph 3 of article 7 of the Republic of Lithuanialaw on operational activities (wording of 20 June 2002), paragraph 1 of article48 (wording of 26 June 1961) and paragraph 1 of article 75 (wording of 29January 1975) of the code of criminal procedure of the Republic of Lithuaniawith the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania. Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania (September 19, 2002), Official Gazette, 2002, no. 93-4000.
• 24. On the compliance of paragraph 3 (wording of 19 September 2000) of article57 of the Republic of Lithuania law on the proceedings of administrative cases, paragraph 4 (wording of 25 November 1999) of article 10 andparagraphs 1 and 2 of article 11 (wording of 25 November 1999) of theRepublic of Lithuania law on state secrets and official secrets with theConstitution of the Republic of Lithuania. Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania (May 15, 2007), Official Gazette, 2007, no. 54-2097.
• 25. On the compliance of part 12 of article 2, item 3 of part 2 of article 7, part 1of article 11 of the Republic of Lithuania Law on operational activities andparts 1 and 2 of article 1981 of the Republic of Lithuania code of criminalprocedure with the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania. Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania (May 8, 2005), Official Gazette, 2000, no. 39-1105.
• 26. On the compliance of the 31 January 1991 Supreme Council of the Republic ofLithuania resolution "On writing of names and family names in passports ofcitizens of the Republic of Lithuania" with the Constitution of the Republic ofLithuania. Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania(October 21, 1999), Official Gazette (1999, no. 90-2662). On the complianceof part 12 of article 2, item 3 of part 2 of article 7, part 1 of article 11 of theRepublic of Lithuania law on operational activities and parts 1 and 2 of article1981 of the Republic of Lithuania code of criminal procedure with theConstitution of the Republic of Lithuania. Ruling of the Constitutional Court ofthe Republic of Lithuania (May 8, 2000), Official Gazette (2000, no.30-1105). On the compliance of paragraph 2 of article 27 of the Republic of Lithuanialaw on telecommunications (wording of 11 July 2000), paragraph 1 of article 2of the Republic of Lithuania law on the amendment of article 27 of the law ontelecommunications, paragraph 4 of article 57 of the Republic of Lithuania lawon telecommunications (wording of 5 July 2002), item 4 of paragraph 3 ofarticle 7 of the Republic of Lithuania law on operational activities (wording of22 May 1997), item 6 of paragraph 3 of article 7 of the Republic of Lithuanialaw on operational activities (wording of 20 June 2002), paragraph 1 of article48 (wording of 26 June 1961) and paragraph 1 of article 75 (wording of 29January 1975) of the code of criminal procedure of the Republic of Lithuaniawith the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania on the compliance of article8 and paragraph 3 of article 14 of the Republic of Lithuania law on theprovision of information to the public with the Constitution of the Republic ofLithuania. Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania(September 19, 2002), Official Gazette (2002, no. 93-4000). On thecompliance of article 3 (wording of 26 June 2001), article 4 (wordings of 26June 2001 and 3 April 2003), paragraph 3 of article 6 (wording of 26 June2001) and paragraph 1 of article 8 (wording of 26 June 2001) of the Republic of Lithuania law on the restraint of organised crime with the Constitution ofthe Republic of Lithuania. Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania (October 23, 2002), Official Gazette, 2002, no. 104-4675.
• 27. On the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal dataand on the free movement of such data. Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of October 24, 1995.
• 28. Raciti v. Hughes. 1995, 7 BPR 14,837, SC(NSW) (Australian case).
• 29. The Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania. Official Gazette, 1992, no. 33-1014.
• 30. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Official Gazette, 2006, no. 68-2497.
• 31. UAB “Lietuvos rytas”, G.Vainauskas v. A.Sabonis, UAB “Respublikos leidiniai”. Vilnius regional court, 2005, no. 2-114-45/05.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10076-012-0008-9