Development of Student's Values in Pedagogical Process

• Authors: Ilze Briška
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Introduction In the sense of system-constructivistism, a competent individual orientates oneself in modern world, judges the values and is personally interested in his own profession and self-development.Aim of the Study To find out the possibilities to facilitate the development of a student' value system.Materials and Methods In the article, the development of values is analysed as development of the individual's motivation sphere and understanding of the emotional experience. The pedagogical model is formed by including components from models of activity studies and reflective studies, and learning from experience into the model of pedagogical activity cycle.Results Pedagogical recommendations for organization of the pedagogical process which enables development of students' values.Conclusions Principles of formation of the student's and the educator's cooperation, which involve the student in a holistic meaningful activity and purposefully reflect it, are displayed.

Keywords

EN

pedagogical process at school higher education; development of values; experience; reflection

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Signum Temporis
• Year: 2008
• Volume: 1
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 78-88

Dates

published

2008-03-01

online

2011-10-19

Contributors

author

Ilze Briška

• Riga Teacher Training and Educational Management Academy, Latvia

References

• Barnett R. (1994) The Limits of Competence. Buchingam, Philadelphia: SRHE & Open University Press, 207 p.
• Barnett R. (2003) Beyond all Reason: Living with Ideology in the University. Open University Press, 220 p.
• Barnett R. (2005) Engaging the Curriculum in Higher Education. Maidenhead: Open University Press, 190 p.
• Brockbank A., Megil J. (2004) The Action Learning Handbook, Rouledge 288 p.
• Colbeck J. (2000) From Cultural Patchwork to Rainbows: Tightropes in Values Education. Moral Education and Pluralism. Ed. by Mal Leicester, Celia Modgil, Sohan Modgil, London: Falmer Press, p. 47-57.
• Crain W. C. (1985) Kohlberg's Stages of Moral Development. Theories of Development. Prentice-Hall. p. 118-136.
• Dewey J. (1974) Experience and Education. New York: Collier Macmillan, 91 p.
• Eisner, E. W. (1985) The art of educational evaluation. The Falmer Press, London & Philadelphia, 195 p.
• Eisner E. (2001) Explicit, Implicit and Null Curricula. Teaching In Mind: How Teacher Thinking Shapes Education.
• Encyclopedia of Higher Education (1992) Oxford, New York, Seul, Tokio: Pergaman Press.
• Eriksons E. (1998) Jaunība. Identitāte un krīze. Rīga: Jumava, 271 lpp.
• Gredler M. E. (1997) Learning and Instruction: Theory into Practice (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jork: Prentice-Hall.
• Griffin C., Holford J., Jarvis P. (2003) The Theory & Practice of Learning. London: Kogan Page. 160 p.
• Karpova Ā. (1994) Personība un individuālais stils. Rīga: Latvijas Universitāte, 291 lpp.
• Knowles Malcolm S. (1950) Informal Adult Education. Chicago: Association press, 102 p.
• Knowles Malcolm S. (1998) The Adult Learner. Houston, Texas: Gulf Publishing Company, 378 p.
• Koķe T. (2003) Nepārtraukta izglītība: galvenie uzdevumi un to īstenošana. Nepārtrauktas izglītības sociāli pedagogiskie aspekti, Rīga: Izglītības soļi, 4.-17. lpp.
• Kron F. W. (1999) Grundwissen Didaktik, 3. erweiterte Auflage. München, Basel: Ernst Reinhard Verlag.
• Medina Rivilla A. (2003) Didactica General. Prentice Hall, Madrid, 435 p.
• Medina Rivilla A. (2005) Desarrollo de competencias profesionales mediante diseno de materiales y sistema tutorial. UNED www.enlaces.udec.cl/centrozonalsur/descarges/presentacion_medicarivilla.ppt 20. 12.2007
• Moore A. (2000) Teaching and Learning: Pedagogy, Curriculum, and Culture. London: Routledge, 192 p.
• Plaude I. (1999) Wertorientierungen der Jugendlichen im internationalen Vergleich. Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovač, 347 S.
• Rogers C. C. (1961) On Becoming Person. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 420 p.
• Rogers C. C. (1967) Modern Approach to Values: Maturity. New York: The Macmillan company, p. 40-54.
• Rokeach M. (1960) The Open and Closed Mind: Investigations into the Nature of Belief Systems and Personality Systems. Basic Books. New York. p. 392.
• Rokeach M. (1973) The Nature of Human Values. New York: Free press, 438 p.
• Rubene Z. (2004) Kritiskā domāšana studiju procesā. Rīga: LU Akadēmiskais apgāds, 247 lpp.
• Schön D. (1987) Educating the Reflective Practitioner, London: Jossey-Bass, 345 p.
• Seligman C., Katz A. N. (1996) The Dinamics of Values Systems. The Psychology of Values, ed. by Mark Z., New York: Erlbaum L. Associates, Mahwah, p. 53-75.
• Špona A., Čehlova Z. (2004) Pētniecība pedagogijā. Rīga: Raka, 202 lpp.
• Špona A. (2004) Audzināšanas process teorijā un praksē. Rīga: Raka, 190 lpp.
• Schwarz S. H. (2006) Basic Human Values: Theory, Methods, and Applications. The Hebrew University of Jerusalem. http://www.fmag.unict.it/Allegati/convegno%207-8-10-05/Schwartzpaper.pdf (20.12.2007.)
• Tiļļa I. (2005) Sociālkultūras mācīšanās organizācijas sistēma. Rīga: Raka, 295 lpp.
• Walklin L. (2002) Teaching and Learning in Further and Adult Education. Nelson Thornes ltd. 194 p.
• Vidnere M. (1997) Ar asarām tas nav pierādāms Rīga: LU, 313 lpp.
• Wood D. (2001) Teacher as Citizen: Professional Development and Democratic Responsibility Transforming Teacher Education: Lessons in Professional Development. Ed. by E. K. Demulder, P. C. Lepage, H. T. Sockett, D. R. Wood. Westport: Bergin and Garvey, 257 p.
• Битинас Б. (1984) Структура процесса воспитания. Каунас: Швиеса, 188 с.
• Леонтъев А. Н. (1975) Деятельность. Сознание. Личность. Москва, Издательство политической литературы, 303 c.
• Леонтъев Д. (1998) Bвeдениe в психологию искусства. Мocквa: Mockoвckий yнивepcитет, 110 c.
• Маслоу А. (2003) Мотивация и личнось. Санкт-Петербург: Питер, 351 c.
• Oллпорт г. (2002) Стaнoвлениe личноcти. Москва: Cмысл, 462 c.
• Столович Л. (1999) Философия. Эстетика. Смех. Санкт-Петербург: Тарту. 383 c.
• Франкл В. (1990) Человек в поисках смысла. Прогресс, Мocквa. 368 c.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10195-011-0010-0