Education for Sustainable Development: Experiences from Action Research with Science Teachers

• Authors: Heba El-Deghaidy
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This study reports on Egyptian science teachers’ experiences in collective action research projects with a focus on education for sustainable development (ESD). Science teachers were enrolled in a study course “Teaching Strategies” that had been revised with a focus on sustainability. The course was introduced in the spring semester of the academic year 2011/2012. Throughout the course, 29 teachers worked in groups to develop projects that promote sustainable development through classroom teaching practices that encourage involvement with local communities around school premises. The framework that guided the study was based on experiential, constructivist and transformative learning theories known collectively as ‘ExConTra’. A mixed methods methodology was used where teachers’ responses to three open-ended reflective questions produced qualitative data that were analysed by identifying themes and patterns. The author developed two quantitative instruments: a Concept Mapping Rubric and a Sustainable Development Questionnaire. The former was to probe the cognitive organisation participants had in relation to the concept of sustainable development before and after developing the action research projects. The latter instrument was used to identify participants’ attitudes towards teaching for ESD and their knowledge of classroom pedagogical practices. Statistical data analysis using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences indicates that teachers in their post-tests had developed: better cognitive organisation for the concept of sustainable development; positive attitudes towards teaching for sustainable development and ESD classroom teaching practices. Involvement in the action research projects where teachers were experiencing, reflecting, conceptualising, constructing, acting and transforming within the context of ESD may be responsible for these results where there are promises to help achieve successful implementation to include ESD in science education.

Keywords

EN

education for sustainable development; science teachers; Egypt; action research

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education
• Year: 2012
• Volume: 3
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 23-40

Dates

published

2012-01-01

online

2013-06-08

Contributors

author

Heba El-Deghaidy

• Suez Canal University, Egypt

References

• Ahlberg, M. (2004). Concept mapping for sustainable development. In A. Ca-as, J. Novak & F. González (Eds.), First international conference on concept mapping. Retrieved May 21, 2011, from http://cmc.ihmc.us/papers/cmc2004-233.pdf
• Azapagic, A., Perdan, S., & Shallcross, D. (2005). How much do engineering students know about sustainable development? The findings of an international survey and possible implications for the engineering curriculum. European Journal of Engineering Education, 30(1), 1-19.[Crossref]
• Briscoe, C., & Wells, E. (2002). Reforming primary science assessment practices: A case study of one teacher’s professional development through action research. Science Education, 86, 417-435.[Crossref]
• Burbank, M., & Kauchak, D. (2003). An alternative model for professional development: Investigations into effective collaboration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 499-514.
• Connelly, F., & Clandinin, D. (1988). Teachers as curriculum planners: Narrating of experience. New York: Teachers College Press.
• Corney, G. (2006). Education for sustainable development: An empirical study of the tensions and challenges faced by geography student teachers. International Research in Geography and Environmental Education, 15(3), 224-240.
• Cotton, D., Warren, M., Maiboroda, O., & Bailey, I. (2007). Sustainable development, higher education and pedagogy: A study of lecturers’ beliefs and attitudes. Environmental Education Research, 13(5), 579-597.
• Cronin, P., Dekker, J., & Dunn, J. (1982). A procedure for using and evaluating concept maps. Research in Science Education, 12(1), 17-24.
• Danielson, C., & McGreal, T. (2000). Teacher evaluation: To enhance professional practice. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
• Darling-Hammond, L. (1996). The right to learn and the advancement of teaching: Research, policy, and practice for democratic education. Educational Researcher, 25(6), 5-17.[Crossref]
• Delors, J. (1996). Learning: The treature within. Report to UNESCO of the International Commission on education for the twenty first century. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
• Esty, D. C., Levy, M. A., & Winston, A. (2003). Environemtal sustainability in the Arab world. In K. Schwab (Ed.), Arab World Competitiveness Report 2002-2003 (pp. 236-248). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Ferrance, E. (2000). Themes in education: Action research. Rhode Island: The Education Alliance.
• Filho, W., & Santos, M. (2005). An analysis of the relationships between sustainable development and the anthroposystem concept. Environment and Sustainable Development, 4(1), 78-88.
• Garret, M., Porter, A., Desimone, L., Birman, B., & Yoon, K. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-945.[Crossref]
• Gedzune, I., & Gedzune, G. (2011). Exploring and promoting ecological consciousness in teacher eduction: The possibilities of educational action research in education for sustainable development. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 13(1), 43-61.
• Hammer, D., & Schifter, D. (2001). Practices of inquiry in teaching and research. Cognition and Instruction, 19, 441-478.[Crossref]
• Haney, J., Czerniak, C., & Lumpe, A. (1996). Teacher beliefs and intentions regarding the implementation of science education reform strands. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(9), 971-993.[Crossref]
• Holbrook, J. (2009). Meeting challenges to sustainable development through science and technology education. Science Education International, 20(1/2), 44-59.
• Jones, P., Trier, C., & Richards, J. (2008). Embedding education for sustainable development in higher education: A case study examining common challenges and opportunities for undergraduate programmes. International Journal of Educational Research, 47, 341-350.[Crossref]
• Kagawa, F. (2007). Dissonance in students’ perceptions of sustainable development and sustainability: Implications for curriculum change. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 8(3), 317-338.
• Kraft, N. (2002). Teacher research as a way to engage in critical reflection: A case study. Reflective Practice, 3(2), 175-189.
• Levinson, R., & Turner, S. (2001). Valuable lessons: Engaging with the social context of science in schools. London: Institute of Education.
• Makrakis, V. (2011). ICT-enabled education for sustainable development: Merging theory with praxis. In M. Youssef & S. A. Anwar (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Annual Conference on e-Learning Excellence in the Middle East 2011 - in Search for New Paradigms for Re-engineering Education (pp. 410-419). Dubai, UAE: Hamdan Bin Mohammed e-University.
• Makrakis, V., & Kostoulas-Makrakis, N. (2012). The challenges of ICTs to online climate change education for sustainable development: The ExConTra learning paradigm. In S. A. Anwar (Ed.), Proceedings of the 5th Conference on eLearning Excellence in the Middle East - Sustainable Innovation in Education (pp. 594- 605). Dubai, UAE: Hamdan Bin Mohammed e-University. Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning to think like an adult: Core concepts of transformation theory. In J. Mezirow & Associates (Eds.), Learning as Transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress (pp. 3-34). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
• Novak, J., & Gowin, B. (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge: Cambride Press.
• Pace, P. (2010). Self-evaluation as a tool in developing environmental responsibility. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 12(1), 5-26.
• Pajares, M. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332.[Crossref]
• Ponte, P., Ax, J., Beijaard, D., & Wubbels, T. (2004). Teachers’ development of professional knowledge through action research and the facilitation of this by teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(6), 589-605.
• Posch, A., & Steiner, G. (2006). Integrating research and teaching on innovation for sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 7(3), 276-292.
• Prawat, R. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs about teaching and learning: A constructivist perspective. American Journal of Education, 100(3), 354-395.[Crossref]
• Qablan, A., Abu Al-Ruz, J., Khasawneh, S., & Al-Omari, A. (2009). Education for sustainable development: Liberation or indoctrination? An assessment of faculty members’ attitudes and classroom practices. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 4(4), 401-417.
• Reason, P. (2007). Education for ecology: Science, aesthetics, spirit and ceremony. Management Learning, 38(1) 27-44.[Crossref]
• Reid, A., & Petocz, P. (2006). University lecturers’ understanding of sustainability. Higher Education, 51, 105-123.[Crossref]
• Sagor, R. (2000). Guiding school improvement with action research. Alexandria, VA: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.
• Salite, I. (2008). Educational action research for sustainability: Constructing a vision for the future in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 10, 5-16.
• Sax, C., & Fisher, D. (2001). Using qualitative action research to effect change: Implications for professional education. Teacher Education Quarterly, 28(2), 71-80.
• Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
• Smith, M. (2009). A questionnaire survey: Teaching about sustainable development in school geography. Retrieved May 28, 2012, from http://www.geography.org.uk/download/GA_GeogEdVol3I1A2.pdf
• Spiropoulou, D., Antonakaki, T., Kontaxaki, S., & Sarantis, B. (2007). Primary teachers’ literacy and attitudes on education for sustainable development. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(5), 443-450.
• Summers, M., & Childs, A. (2007). Student science teachers’ conceptions of sustainable development: An empirical study of three postgraduate training cohorts. Research in Science & Technological Education, 25(3), 307-327.
• Summers, M., Childs, A., & Corney, G. (2005). Education for sustainable development in initial teacher training: Issues for interdisciplinary collaboration. Environmental Education Research, 11(5), 623-647. Summers, M., Corney, G., & Childs, A. (2004). Student teachers’ conceptions of sustainable development: The starting-points of geographers and scientists. Educational Research, 46(2), 163-182.
• Tilbury, D. (2011). What are commonly accepted learning processes aligned with ESD? Education for sustainable development: An expert review of processes and learning. Retrieved May 20, 2012, from http://www.iucn.org/?uNewsID=7368
• UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation). (2008). Regional guiding framework of education for sustaianble development in the Arab region. Beirut: UNESCO Regional Bureau for Education in Arab States-Beirut.
• UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation). (2004). United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Development: Draft international implementation scheme. Retrieved May 20, 2012, from http://portal.UNESCO.org/education/en/ev.php
• Van Zee, E., Lay, D., & Roberts, D. (2003). Fostering collaborative inquiries by prospective and practicing elementary and middle school teachers. Science Education, 87(4), 588-612.[Crossref]
• Wellington, J. (2003). Science education for citizenship and a sustainable future. Pastoral Care in Education, 21(30), 13-18.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10230-012-0002-1