Cognitive style and experiences of working environment in small and medium-sized enterprises

• Authors: Erika Löfström
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Individual differences in information processing are viewed through the concept of cognitive style. Cognitive style is displayed in various situations in working life in which the individual engages in problem solving, decision making or learning. The aim of this study was to analyse the relationships between personal (gender, age, level of education) and work-specific (position, field of trade, number of years of work experience in the field) variables and cognitive style. This research applies a quantitative design by using the Cognitive Style Index and a working environment index. Data were collected from 228 staff members in 100 small and medium-sized enterprises in Finland. The study replicated previous research findings in which women display a more analytical cognitive style than men. The lower the level of education, the higher the score is on the scale measuring analytic cognitive style. Regarding position in working hierarchies, the managers constituted the least analytic group in terms of cognitive style (convergent thinking with focus on detail), the workers the most analytic one. The experiences of a supportive working environment correlated positively with an intuitive cognitive style. The experiences of a prejudiced working environment correlated positively with an analytic cognitive style (divergent thinking with focus on the "big picture"). The implications for human resources management are outlined.

Keywords

EN

cognitive style; information processing; individual differences; intuition-analysis dimension; human resources; small and mediumsized enterprises

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Studies for the Learning Society
• Year: 2008
• Volume: 1
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 49-61

Dates

published

2008-01-01

online

2012-06-04

Contributors

author

Erika Löfström

• University of Helsinki, Finland

References

• Allinson, C. W., Armstrong, S., & Hayes, J. (2001). The effects of cognitive style on leader-member exchange: A study of manager-subordinate dyads. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74(2), 201-220.[Crossref]
• Allinson, C. W., & Hayes, J. (1996). The cognitive style index: A measure of intuition-analysis for organizational research. Journal of Management Studies, 33, 119-135.[Crossref]
• Billett, S. (1998). Constructing vocational knowledge: Situations and other social sources. Journal of Education at Work, 11, 255-273.[Crossref]
• Entwistle, N. J. (1981). Styles of teaching and learning: An integrated outline of educational psychology for students, teachers and lecturers. Chichester: Wiley.
• Federation of Finnish Enterprises. (2002, December 9). Retrieved March 22, 2004 from Federation of Finnish Enterprises Web site
• Ford, J. K., MacCallum, R. C., & Tait, M. (1986). The application of exploratory factor analysis in applied psychology: A critical review and analysis. Personnel Psychology, 39, 291-313.[Crossref]
• Forrester, K., Payne, J., & Ward, K. (1995). Lifelong education and the workplace: A critical analysis. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 14(4), 292-305.[Crossref]
• Forss, S., & Karisalmi, S. (1997). 50 vuotta täyttäneiden työssä pysyminen ja sen taustatekijöitä (50 year-olds remaining at work and its underlying factors). In M. Bergström, M. S. Huuskonen, K. Koskinen, K. Lindström, S. Kaleva, G. Ahonen, J. Järvisalo, S. Forss, A. Järviskoski & R. Vuorio (Eds.), Työkyky yksilön, pienyrityksen ja yhteiskunnan menestystekijänä (Working capacity as a success factor in the individual, small enterprises and in society, English Summary) (pp. 209-220, 153-167). People and Work Research Reports, 10. Helsinki: Finnish Institute of Occupational Health.
• Furnham, A. (1997). The psychology of behaviour at work: The individual in the organization. Hove East Sussex: Psychology Press.
• Garrick, J. (1998). Informal learning in the workplace: Unmasking human resource development. London: Routledge.
• Graff, M. (2003). Individual differences in sense of classroom community in a blended learning environment. Journal of Educational Media, 28(2-3), 203-211.
• Grigorenko, E. L., & Sternberg, R. J. (1995). Thinking styles. In D. H. Saklofske & M. Zeidner (Eds.), International handbook of personality and intelligence (pp. 205-230). New York, NY: Plenum.
• Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
• Hayes, J., & Allinson, C. W. (1994). Cognitive style and its relevance for management practice. British Journal of Management, 5, 53-71.[Crossref]
• Hayes, J., & Allinson, C. W. (1996). The implications of learning styles for training and development: A discussion of the matching hypothesis. British Journal of Management, 7, 53-71.
• Hayes, J., & Allinson, C. W. (1998). Cognitive style and the theory and practice of individual and collective learning in organizations. Human Relations, 51(7), 847-871.[Crossref]
• Hayes, J., Allinson, C. W., & Armstrong, S. J. (2004). Intuition, women managers and gendered stereotypes. Personnel Review, 33, 403-417.[Crossref]
• Hayes, J., Allinson, C. W., Hudson, R. S., & Keasey, K. (2003). Further reflections on the nature of intuition-analysis and the construct validity of the Cognitive Style Index. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76, 269-278.[Crossref]
• Hodgkinson, G. P., & Sadler-Smith, E. (2003). Complex or unitary? A critique and empirical re-assessment of the Allinson-Hayes Cognitive Style Index. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76, 243-268.[Crossref]
• Hudson, L. (1968). Frames of mind. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
• Hyland, T., & Matlay, H. (1997). Small businesses, training needs and VET provision. Journal of Education and Work, 10(2), 129-139.[Crossref]
• Kagan, J., Rosman, B. L., Day, D., Albert, J., & Philips, W. (1964). Information processing in the child: Significance of analytic and reflective attitudes. Psychological Monographs, 78, 1-37.[Crossref]
• Kirton, M. J. (1976). Adaptors and innovators, a description of and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 622-629.[Crossref]
• Kozhevnikov, M., Hegarty, M., & Mayer R. E. (2002). Revising the visualizer-verbalizer dimension: Evidence for two types of visualizers. Cognition and Instruction, 20(1), 47-77.[Crossref]
• Laufer, E. A., & Glick, J. (1996). Expert and novice differences in cognition and activity: A practical work activity. In Y. Engeström & D. Middleton (Eds.). Cognition and communication at work (pp. 177-198). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Löfström, E. (2005). Intuition and analysis at work: The role of cognitive style in experiences of work contexts. Department of Education Research Report, 198. Helsinki: University of Helsinki. Retrieved November 1,2006, from
• Martinsen, Ø. (1994). Cognitive style and insight. Bergen: University of Bergen, Faculty of Psychology.
• Messick, S. (1978). Personality consistencies in cognition and creativity. In S. Messick & Associates (Eds.), Individuality in learning: Implications of cognitive style and creativity for human development (pp. 4-33). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
• Ostroff, C., & Rothausen, T. J. (1997). The moderating effect of tenure in person-environment fit: A field study in educational organizations. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 70(2), 173-189.[Crossref]
• Pask, G., & Scott, B. C. E. (1972). Learning strategies and individual competence. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 4, 217-253.[Crossref]
• Pearson, M. (1996). Experience, skill and competitiveness: The implications of an ageing population for the workplace. EF/96/02/EN. Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.
• Peterson, E. R., Deary, I. J., & Austin E. J. (2003). The reliability of Riding's Cognitive Style Analysis Test. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 881-891.[Crossref]
• Rayner, S., & Riding, R. (1997). Towards a categorisation of cognitive styles and learning styles. Journal of Educational Psychology, 17(1-2), 5-27.
• Riding, R. (1997). On the nature of cognitive style. Journal of Educational Psychology, 17, 29-49.
• Riding, R., & Rayner, S. (1998). Cognitive styles and learning strategies: Understanding style differences in learning behaviour. London: David Fulton Publishers.
• Russell, A. J. (1997). The effect of learner variables cognitive style on learning performance in a vocational training environment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 17, 195-208.
• Saracho, O. N. (1998). Research directions for cognitive style and education. International Journal of Educational Research, 29, 287-290.[Crossref]
• Simonton, D. K. (1980). Intuition and analysis: A predictive and explanatory model. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 102, 3-60.
• Sänkiaho, T. (1974). Temput ja kuinka ne tehdään. Monimuuttujamenetelmät kansan palvelijoina (The tricks and how to do them. Multivariate methods serving the people). Reports from the Institute for Educational Research, 220. Tampere: University of Tampere.
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.) New York, NY: Harper Collins.
• Witkin, H. A., Dyk, R. B., Faterson, H. F., Goodenough, D. R., & Karp, S. A. (1962). Psychological differentiation. New York, NY: Wiley.
• Witkin, H. A., & Goodenough, D. R. (1981). Cognitive styles, essence and origins: Field dependence and field independence. New York, NY: International Universities Press.
• Woll, S. (2002). Everyday thinking: Memory, reasoning and judgment in the real world. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10240-012-0018-x