Perspective Taking in Workplaces

• Authors: Salvatore Zappalà
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Workplaces are often described as places in which individuals are motivated by their self-interests and in which negative events like time pressure, anxiety, conflict with co-workers, miscomprehensions, difficulties in solving problems, not-transmitted or not-exchanged information that lead to mistakes, and in some cases to injuries, stress or control, are part of everyday life (Dormann & Zapf, 2002; Schabracq, Winnubst and Cooper, 2003). Such situations are often the result of the limited comprehension of needs, skills, or information available to colleagues, supervisors, subordinates, clients or providers. However, workplaces are also places in which employees take care of clients, support colleagues and subordinates (Rhoades & Eisenberger, 2002), are enthusiastic about their job (Bakker et al., 2008), are motivated by leaders that encourage employees to transcend their own self-interests for the good of the group or the organization and provide them with the confidence to perform beyond expectations (Bass, 1997). Thus positive relationships at work are becoming a new interdisciplinary domain of inquiry (Dutton & Ragins, 2006). Within this positive relationships framework, in this paper we focus on a positive component of workplaces, and particularly on an individual cognitive and emotional process that has an important role in the workplace because it facilitates interpersonal relations and communications: it is the perspective taking process. In order to describe perspective taking, we will refer to some empirical studies and particularly to the review published by Parker, Atkins and Axtell in 2008 on the International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Perspective taking is a well established psychological construct, investigated both in the field of human development, as an important component of reasoning and moral development, and also in social and clinical psychology, where it is considered a component of social behaviors and of the therapeutic process (Parker & Axtell, 2001). It has also been conceptualized in different ways. Duan and Hill (1996) describe three approaches to explain reasons for perspective taking behavior: a dispositional approach, that considers empathy as a relatively stable trait or a general ability; a cognitive-affective experience influenced by situational conditions; and finally as a multiphased experiential process. However, although in modern organizations working cooperatively and taking into account customers’ needs and experiences are becoming even more important (Schneider, White, and Paul, 1998; West, Tjosvold and Smith, 2003), very few studies have considered perspective taking process within organizations (Parker & Axtell, 2001). This is interesting because taking into account the perspective of others may contribute to more collaborative workplaces, where it is pleasant to work, as also enlighted in the title of the Parker, Atkins and Axtell’s (2008) paper: “Building better workplaces” is one of the possible outcomes of perspective taking. This paper aims to make available to a large audience such studies and, in relation to the topic of the conference organized by “Psychology and Communion”, consider connections between this concept and ideas and writings by Chiara Lubich.

Keywords

EN

engagement; perspective taking; building better workplaces

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Journal for Perspectives of Economic Political and Social Integration
• Year: 2014
• Volume: 19
• Issue: 1-2
• Pages: 55-70

Dates

online

2014-07-17

Contributors

author

Salvatore Zappalà

References

• Axtell, C. M., Parker, S. K., Holman, D., Totterdell, P. (2007). Enhancing customer service: Perspective taking in a call centre. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 16, 141-168.[Crossref]
• Baker, W., Dutton, J.E. (2006). Enabling positive social capital in organizations. In: J. Dutton and B. Ragins (Eds.). Exploring Positive Relationships at Work: Building a Theoretical and Research Foundation. Psychology Press.
• Bakker, A., Schaufeli, W., Leiter M., Taris, T. (2008). Work engagement: an emerging concept in occupational health psychology. Work and Stress, 22, 187-200.[WoS][Crossref]
• Bass, B. M. (1997). Does the transactional transformational leadership paradigm transcend organizational and national boundaries? American Psychologist, 52, 130–39.[Crossref]
• Bateman, T. S., Organ, D. W. (1983). Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee citizenship. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 587-595.[Crossref]
• Brief, A. P., Motowidlo, S. J. (1986). Prosocial organizational behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 11, 710-725.
• Cannon-Bowers, J., Salas E., Converse S. (1993). Shared mental models in expert team decision making. In J. Castellan (Ed.) Individual and group decision making, Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum Ass.
• Cialdini, R.B., Brown, S.L., Lewis, B.P., Luce, C., Neuberg, S.L. (1997). Reinterpreting the empathy - altruism relationship: When one into one equals oneness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 481-494.[Crossref]
• De Dreu, C. K. W., Nauta, A. (2009). Self-interest and other-orientation in organizational behavior: Implications for job performance, prosocial behavior, and personal initiative. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94 (4), 913-926.
• Dormann, C., Zapf, D. (2002). Social stressors at work, irritation, and depressive symptoms: Accounting for unmeasured third variables in a multi-wave study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, 33–58.[Crossref]
• Duan, C, Hill, C. E. (1996). The current state of empathy research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43, 261-274.[Crossref]
• Dutton, J., Ragins, B.R. (2006). Exploring Positive Relationships at Work: Building a Theoretical and Research Foundation. Psychology Press.
• George, J. M. (1991). State or trait: Effects of positive mood on prosocial behaviors at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 299-307.[Crossref]
• Grant, A.M., Berry, J.W. (2011). The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective-taking, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 73-96.[Crossref]
• Hackman, J. R., Oldham, G. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 250-279.[Crossref]
• Lubich, Ch. (1971). La carità come ideale, in: Idem (1979) Tutti uno – Scritti spirituali 3, Roma: Città Nuova.
• Lubich, Ch. (1999). When Our Love is Charity. Spiritual Writings. Vol. 2, New City Press, New York, 1991, reprinted in 1999, pp 16-17.
• Park, H. S., Raile, A. (2010). Perspective taking and communication satisfaction among kindergarten teachers. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 569-581.[WoS][Crossref]
• Parker, S. K., Axtell, C.M. (2001). Seeing another view point: Antecedents and outcomes of employee perspectivetaking. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 1085-1100.[Crossref]
• Parker, S. K., Atkins, P. Axtell, C. M. (2008). Building better work places through individual perspective taking: A fresh look at a fundamental human process. In G. Hodgkinson & K. Ford (Eds.). International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 23, 149-196, Chichester: Wiley.
• Parker, S. K., Wall, T. D., Jackson, P. R. (1997). ‘That’s not my job’: Developing exible employee work orientations. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 899–929.[Crossref]
• Rico, R., Sánchez-Manzanares, M., Gil, F., Gibson, C. (2008). Team implicit coordination processes: A team knowledge-based approach. Academy of Management Review, 33, 163-184.[Crossref]
• Rhoades, L., Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived Organizational Support: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 698–714.[Crossref]
• Schabracq, M.J., Winnubst, J.A.M., Cooper, C.L. (2003). The Handbook of Work and Health Psychology. Chichester UK: Wiley.
• Schneider, B. White, S.S., Paul, M.C. (1998). Linking service climate and customer perceptions of service quality: test of a causal model. Journal of Applied Psychology. 83 (2), 150-163.
• West, M.A., Tjosvold, D., Smith, K.G. (2003). International Handbook of Organizational Teamwork and Cooperative Working. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10241-012-0007-5