Masculinity and Femininity: Essential to the Identity of the Human Person

• Authors: Nancy O'Donnell
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The title of this congress begins with the word “identity”. It also includes the word “reciprocity,” which indicates a form of relationship and finally, “gift of self”. This would lead us to conclude that the identity of the human person has something to do with reciprocity and that reciprocity involves giving of oneself to others. This talk will attempt to shed light on how the concept of gender might in some way be incorporated into these three concepts. Defining what constitutes the identity of the human person has been explored, and attempts to define it have been made by every major theorist in the field of psychology. At a previous Psychology and Communion congress one of the talks (Ionata, 2002) spoke of loving and being loved in return as the basic foundation of human identity. In that presentation we find the following observation: “The identity of the human person can be compared to the identity of a book: we know where and when it was printed; but the author is certainly not the publishing house, nor is the typesetter who prepared the text…The same is true for us human beings: we know the time and date of birth. But who is author?” (31). We ask ourselves, therefore: what lies at the core of the identity of this being who is born at a certain time on a certain date? Before proceeding, I think it is important to note that the basic idea regarding the identity of the human person, as we have defined and understood it from the inception of psychology and communion and explored in previous encounters, remains unchanged. I will use a quote of Chiara Lubich here that perhaps many of you know but which can serve the purpose of laying the foundation for what follows: Human beings are “(…) all equal but distinct. To each person [God] gave his own beauty so that they would be desirable and lovable by others; and so that in love (the common substance in which they recognize themselves as one and see themselves in each other) they would be recomposed into the One who had created them with his Light, which is Himself.” Now we ask ourselves: What exactly is this “beauty” that Chiara is speaking of? What are the components, if you will, of our identity that makes us “… desirable and lovable by others…”?

Keywords

EN

gender identity; “fully gendered” human person

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Journal for Perspectives of Economic Political and Social Integration
• Year: 2014
• Volume: 19
• Issue: 1-2
• Pages: 109-122

Dates

online

2014-07-17

Contributors

author

Nancy O'Donnell

References

• Alfred Adler’s “individual psychology”. Lecture notes, Department of Psychology, Sonoma State University, San Francisco, CA. Retrieved from http://www. sonoma.edu/users/d/daniels/adler.htm
• Brady, M. T. (2005). The Riddle of Masculinity. Panel presented at the Winter Meeting of the American Psychoanalytic Association, New York. http://www.apsa.org/portals/1/docs/japa/544/brady-1195a.pdf
• Chodorow, N., J. (1974). Family Structure and Feminine Personality. In M.Z. Rosaldo, L. Lamphere, eds. Woman, Culture and Society. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
• Chodorow, N., J. (1978). The Reproduction of Mothering. Berkeley: University of California Press.
• Chodorow, N. J. (1994). Femininities, masculinities, sexualities: Freud and beyond. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky.
• Davis, D. (2006). Notes on Freud’s theory of femininity. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, Haverford College, Haverford, PA. Retrieved from http://www.haverford.edu/psych/ddavis/p109g/freudfem.html
• Dyer, D. R. (2006). Reflections on psychology, culture, and life. Retrieved from http://www.cgjungpage.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view &id =756&Itemid=41
• Flanagan, O. J. (n.d.). Freud: masculinity, femininity. Informally published manuscript, Department of Psychology, Duke University, Durham, NC. Retrieved from http://www.duke.edu/~ojf/FreudOnMasculinityandFemininity.pdf
• Freud, S. (1933). New introductory lectures on psychoanalysis. Lecture 33: Femininity. Standard Edition, v. 22. pp. 136-157.
• Freud, S. (1965). New introductory lectures on psychoanalysis. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.
• Gergen, K., J. (2009). Relational Being. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.
• Herrmann-Keeling, R. (n.d.). Dr. Alfred Adler and individual psychology. Retrieved from http://www.lifecourseinstitute.com/Adler.htm
• Hill, G. (1992) Masculine and Feminine, Boston, MA: Shambhala.
• Ho, D., Y., F (1995). Selfhood and Identity in Confucianism, Taoism, Buddhism, and Hinduism: Contrasts With the West. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, Vol. 25, Issue 2, pages 115–139, June 1995
• Ionata, P. (2002). L’affermazione ‘Dio è amore e la psicologia. in Verso un pieno umanesimo, atti del congress di psicologia. Castelgandolfo, 14-16 giugno 2002, p. 31.
• Johnson, R. A. (1985). We: understanding the psychology of romantic love. San Francisco, CA: Harper.
• Jung, E. (1969) Animus and Anima, New York: Spring Publications.
• McManus, B. (1999). Animus/anima: the archetype of contrasexuality. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, College of New Rochelle, Brooklyn, New York. Retrieved from http://www2.cnr.edu/home/bmcmanus/anima.html
• Regine, B. (2010) Iron Butterflies: women transforming themselves and the world. New York: Prometheus Books.
• Satinover, J. (1995). The true masculine and the true feminine. In L. Payne (Ed.), Crisis in masculinity (pp. 123-140). Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House.
• Sharpe, M. (2005). Lacan, Jacques. Internet encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved March 12, 2011, from http://www.iep.utm.edu/lacweb/
• Spence, J. T. (1993). Gender-Related Traits and Gender Ideology: Evidence for a multifactorial theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64: 624-635.
• Stein, M. (1998). Jung’s Map of the Soul. Chicago, Illinois: Open Court.
• Toub, G. (2003). Jung and gender: masculine and feminine revisited. Retrieved from http://www.cgjungpage.org/index2.php?option=com_content&do_ pdf=1&id=147

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10241-012-0010-x