Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2010 | 13 | 3 | 93-106

Article title

The analysis of innovation input - output relationships in EU member states

Content

Title variants

PL
Analiza powiązań nakładów i efektów działalności innowacyjnej w krajach UE

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
This article presents some findings of an analysis of innovation input - output relationship in EU member states. The first section of the paper considers the role of innovation in economic growth with particular attention to the new endogenous growth models. In the second part, the dichotomous approach to innovation and its measures is presented. The last section contains the methodology and outcome of research. The results of the study show that R&D expenditures, ICT and human capital are the key innovation inputs that affect such innovation outputs as innovation and patent propensity and new-to-market sales.
PL
Prezentowany artykuł przedstawia wyniki analizy powiązań nakładów i efektów działalności innowacyjnej w krajach UE. W pierwszej części opracowania przedstawiono rolę innowacji w kreowaniu wzrostu gospodarczego ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem nowych modeli wzrostu endogenicznego. W drugiej części pracy scharakteryzowano pojęcie i mierniki innowacji w ujęciu dwuwymiarowym. Ostatnia część artykułu prezentuje metodykę i wyniki badania. Zgodnie z nimi wydatki na BiR, technologie informacyjno komunikacyjne oraz kapitał ludzki, traktowane jako wkład w proces innowacyjny, mają istotny wpływ na wyniki działalności innowacyjnej, w szczególności na skłonność do innowacji i patentowania oraz przychody ze sprzedaży nowych produktów.

Keywords

Year

Volume

13

Issue

3

Pages

93-106

Physical description

Dates

published
2010-01-01
online
2010-12-16

Contributors

  • Maria Curie-Skłodowska University in Lublin
author
  • University of Life Sciences in Lublin

References

  • Adams R., Bessant J., Phelps R. (2006),Innovation management measurement: a review, ‘International Journal of Management Reviews’, Vol. 8, No. 1
  • Aghion P., Howitt P. (1992),A model of growth through creative destruction, ‘Econometrica’, Vol. 60, No. 2
  • Arrow K. J. (1962),The economic implications of learning by doing, ‘Review of Economic Studies’, Vol. 29, No. 1
  • Crosby M. (2000),Patents, innovation and growth, ‘Economic Record’, Vol. 76, No. 234
  • Denison E. (1962),The sources of economic growth in the United States and the alternatives before us, Committee for Economic Development, New York
  • Freeman C., Soete L. (1999),The economics of industrial innovation, Pinter, London
  • Hair J. F., Black W. C., Babin B. J., Anderson R. E., Tatham R. L. (1998),Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th edition, Prentice Hall International, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey
  • Hollanders H., Cruysen A. (2008),Rethinking the European Innovation Scoreboard: A New Methodology for 2008-2010, Unu-Merit, Maastricht
  • Hotelling H. (1935),The Most Predictable Criterion, ‘Journal of Educational Psychology’, Vol. 26
  • Kaldor N. (1957),A Model of Economic Growth, ‘Economic Journal’, Vol. 67
  • Kennedy C., Thirlwall A. P. (1972),Technical Progress: A Survey, ‘Economic Journal’, vol. 82
  • Kimberly J. R. (1981),Managerial innovation, [in:] Nystrom P. C. and Starbuck W. H. (Ed),Hand Book of Organization Design, Oxford University Press, Oxford
  • Kleinknecht A., Montfort K., Brouwer E. (2002),The Non-Trivial Choice between Innovation Indicators, ‘Economics of Innovation and New Technology’, vol. 11, issue 2
  • LeBel P. (2008),The role of creative innovation in economic growth: Some international comparisons, ‘Journal of Asian Economics’, Vol. 19
  • Lucas R. (1988),On the Mechanics of Economic Development, ‘Journal of Monetary Economics’
  • Marinell G. (1990),Multivariate Verfahren, 3rd edition, Oldenburg Publisher, Munich Oslo manual. Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data, OECD, 2005
  • Plessis M. D. (2007),The role of knowledge management in innovation, ‘Journal of Knowledge Management’, Vol. 11, No. 4
  • Romer P. (1986),Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth, ‘Journal of Political Economy’, Vol. 94, No. 5
  • Romer P. (1990),Endogenous technological change, ‘Journal of Political Economy’, Vol. 98, No. 5
  • Rose S., Shipp S., Lal B., Stone A. (2009),Frameworks for Measuring Innovation: Initial Approaches, Athena Alliance, Washington
  • Rothwell R. (1992),Successful Industrial Innovation: Critical Factors for the 1990's, ‘R and D Management’, vol. 22, no. 3
  • Solow R. (1957),Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function, ‘Review of Economics and Statistics’, Vol. 39
  • Stevens J. P. (2002),Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Science, 4th edition, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey
  • Thompson B. (1984),Canonical Correlation Analysis, Sage University Paper series on Qualitative Applications in the Social Sciences, No. 47, Sage Publications, London

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.hdl_11089_8238
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.