Differentiation of Polish and Ukrainian consumers’ attitudes to Russian brands and international brands remaining on the Russian market

• Authors: Iryna Reshetnikova , Katarzyna Sanak-Kosmowska , Jan W. Wiktor

Abstracts

EN

Purpose – The purpose of this paper was identification and empirical assessment of the differentiation of consumers’ attitudes in Ukraine and Poland to Russian brands and other brands offered on the Russian market after Russia’s aggression against Ukraine on February 24, 2022. Design/methodology/approach – The main research methods include a systematic literature review and the authors’ own surveys conducted in November 2022. The research sample comprised 950 consumers – 67% of them were Poles, 30% Ukrainians and 3% from other countries. Findings – A respondents’ country (Poland and Ukraine) does not impact attitudes to brands offered on the Russian market after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022. Moreover, it does not affect and differentiate emotional engagement in the conflict and assistance to war victims. Cluster analysis resulted in identifying two groups on the basis of consumers’ declared emotional reactions to the war. The first group was smaller (N 5 353, 37.2%), referred to as “indifferent consumers”, and was characterized by a greater inclination to purchase brands offered in Russia. The other cluster, referred to as “sensitive consumers” (N 5 597, 62.8%), comprises those engaged in offering assistance to war victims, showing strong emotions in connection with the aggression and military activities and characterized by a clearly negative attitude to Russian and other offered brands and an inclination to boycott these brands. Research limitations/implications – A short time horizon, the study confined to two countries, difficulties in reaching Ukrainian respondents due to power failures in Ukraine in the period of conducting the survey (November 2022), a non-representative research sample – overrepresentation of people aged 18–25 years. Practical implications – The research study contributes to the knowledge about consumer brand attitudes and preferences under unique social, economic and market conditions. These conditions were created by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022, as well as the international and global character of the war in Ukraine. The significant implications of the study refer to brand communication policies and companies’ CSR-related declarations. A number of consumers’ errors were recorded, resulting from wrong brand retrieval, which were rectified at a later stage as a result of international restrictions imposed on Russia, harsh media criticism and social international embargoes imposed on brands offered in Russia. The marketing communication of contemporary global brands should give consideration to the informative function of CSR activities, and the communication process should be continuous. Critical attitudes and an inclination to boycott brands point to the possible consequences faced by inconsistent and ethically doubtful brand policies. This implication is clearly confirmed by the results of the study. Social implications – The authors also wish to highlight the implications for practice and society. As mentioned earlier, Polish consumers involved in providing aid to victims of the war also expressed their opposition to the war by boycotting Russian products and international brands remaining in Russia. Popularization of the research results obtained by the authors can be a form of sensitizing the public to the need for long-term relief, awakening global awareness of the essence and importance of sanctions imposed on Russia, as well as the possibility of expressing opposition through individual purchasing decisions and boycotting brands still present in Russia. Originality/value – The study allowed for identifying consumers’ differentiated brand attitudes in two countries: a country inflicted by war (Ukraine) and a front-line country, strongly supporting Ukraine (Poland). The research contributes to consumer behavior theories and studies of consumer attitudes and preferences from the perspective of international corporations’ CSR activities under the unique conditions of war. Also, it contributes to the knowledge of the mechanism of forming attitudes to Russian and international brands offered in Russia among CEE consumers.

Keywords

EN

Ethnocentrism; Consumer attitudes; Consumer boycott; War in Ukraine

• Publisher: Akademia Leona Koźmińskiego
• Journal: Central European Management Journal
• Year: 2024
• Volume: 32
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 152-175

Dates

published

2024

Contributors

author

Iryna Reshetnikova

• Department of Marketing, Cracow University of Economics, Krakow, Poland

author

Katarzyna Sanak-Kosmowska

• Department of Marketing, Cracow University of Economics, Krakow, Poland

author

Jan W. Wiktor

• Department of Marketing, Cracow University of Economics, Krakow, Poland

References

• Aliu, F., Hašková, S., & Bajra, U. Q. (2022). Consequences of Russian invasion on Ukraine: Evidence from foreign exchange rates. Journal of Risk Finance, 24(1), 40–58. doi: 10.1108/JRF-05-2022-0127.
• Altintas, M. H., Kurtulmusoglu, B. F., Kaufmann, H. R., Kilic, S., & Harcar, T. (2013). Consumer boycotts of foreign products: A metric model. Amfiteatru Economic, 15(34), 485–504.
• Antonides, G., & Raaij, F. W. (1999). Consumer behaviour. A European perspective. London: Wiley.
• Aronson, E. (2011). The social animal. New York: Worth/Freeman.
• Ashenfelter, O. C., Ciccarella, S. M., & Shatz, H. J. (2007). French wine and the U.S. Boycott of 2003: Does politics really affect commerce? NBER Working Paper, 13258. doi: 10.3386/w13258.
• Association Agreement (2022). Between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Ukraine, of the other part, Brussels on 21 March 2014. EU-Ukraine Association Agreement, available from: https://ec.europa.eu/ (accessed 2 December 2022).
• Astrov, V., Ghodsi, M., Grieveson, R., Holzner, M., Kochnev, A., Landesmann, M., & Pindyuk, O. (2022). Russia’s invasion of Ukraine: Assessment of the humanitarian, economic, and financial impact in the short and medium term. International Economics and Economy Policy, 19, 331–381. doi:10.1007/s10368-022-00546-5.
• Babbie, E. (2014). The practice of social research (14th ed.). Boston: CENGAGE Learning Custom Publishing.
• Barney, D. (2004). The network society. Key concept series. Cambridge: Polity.
• Bartosik-Purgat, M. (Ed.) (2017). Zachowania konsumentów. Globalizacja, nowe technologie, aktualne trendy, otoczenie społeczno-kulturowe. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
• Bida, M., & Ruda, I. (2022). Economic and financial consequences of war in Ukraine: Analysis of development scenarios. Financial Internet Quarterly, 18(3), 88–101. doi: 10.2478/fiqf-2022-0022.
• Bryła, P., & Domanski, T. (2022). Consumer ethnocentrism, country of origin and marketing. Food- market in Poland. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781003290414.
• Bylok, F. (2013). Konsumpcja, konsument i społeczeństwo konsumpcyjne we współczesnym świecie. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Sla˛sk.
• Caliński, T, & Harabasz, J (1974). A dendrite method for cluster analysis. Communications in Statistics, 1–27 (In press). doi:10.1080/03610927408827101.
• Castells, M. (2009). The rise of the network society. Cambridge: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781444319514.
• Ceheda, S., & Shevchuk, V. (2019). Hibrydna viina Rosii proty Ukrainy: istorychnyi vymir. Nauka i oborona, 1, 31–35.
• Cheldelin, S., Druckman, D., & Fast, L. (2003). Conflict: From analysis to Intervention. London: Continuum.
• Cialdini, R. (2008). Influence. Science and practice. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
• Dąbrowska, A., Bylok, F., Janoś-Kresło, M., Kiełczewski, D., & Ozimek, I. (2015). Kompetencje konsumentów. Innowacyjne zachowania. Zrównoważona konsumpcja. Warszawa: PWE.
• DeWinter-Schmitt, R., Jones, S., & Stazinski, R. (2022). Missing in action? Investor responses to the war in Ukraine. Business and Human Rights Journal, 7(3), 487–493. doi: 10.1017/bhj.2022.26.
• Eagly, A., & Chaiken, S. (1998). Attitude structure and function. In Handbook of social psychology. Boston: McGrow Company.
• East, R., Sing, J., Wright, M., & Vanhuele, M. (2017). Consumer behaviour: Applications in marketing. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
• Engel, J. F., Kollat, D. T., & Blackwell, R. D. (1968). Consumer behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
• Engel, J. F., Blackwell, R. D., & Miniard, P. W. (1994). Consumer behavior. Chicago: The Dryden Press.
• EU citizens’ support for Ukraine is solid, Eurobarometer survey finds (n.d.). Available from: https:// www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20221205IPR60901/eu-citizens-support-for- ukraine-is-solid-eurobarometer-survey-finds (accessed 21 January 2023).
• Falkowski, A., & Tyszka, T. (2009). Psychologia zachowan konsumenckich. Gdansk: GWP.
• Fishbein, M. (1965). Prediction of interpersonal preferences and group member satisfaction from estimated attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1(6), 663–667. doi: 10.1037/h0022074.
• Fomenko, O. (2022). Brand new Ukraine? Cultural icons and national identity in times of war. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 19, 223–227. doi: 10.1057/s41254-022-00278-y.
• Foxall, G. R., Goldsmith, R. E., & Brown, S. (1998). Consumer psychology for marketing. London: Thomson.
• Fuson, W. M. (1943). Attitudes: A note on the concept and its research context. American Sociological Review, 7.
• Garbarski, L. (2001). Zachowania nabywców. Warszawa: PWE.
• Gole, I., Balu, F. O., Negescu, M. D. O., & Dima, C. (2022). Economic implications of the effects of the Ukrainian war. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 11(4), 17–24. doi: 10.14207/ejsd. 2022.v11n4p17.
• Hansen, F. (1972). Consumer choice behavior: A cognitive theory. New York: The Free Press.
• Horbulin, V. (2017). Svitova hibrydna viina: ukrainskyi front: monohrafiia. Kyiv: NISD.
• Howard, J. A., & Shet, J. N. (1969). The theory of buyer behaviour. New York: Wiley.
• Kaneya, N. (2022). Brave like Ukraine: A critical discourse perspective on Ukraine’s wartime brand. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy. doi: 10.1057/s41254-022-00273-3.
• Kantar (2022). Available from: https://services.google.com/fh/files/events/webinar.pdf (accessed 21 January 2023).
• Katona, G. (1960). The powerful consumer. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
• Khudaykulova, M., Yuanqiong, H., Khudaykulov, A., & Obrenovic, B. (2022). Economic consequences and implications of the Ukraine-Russia war. International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration, 8(4), 44–52. doi: 10.18775/ijmsba.1849-5664-5419.2014.84.1005.
• Kieżel, E. & Burgiel, A. (Eds) (2018). Wiedza ekonomiczna konsumentów a racjonalność ich zachowań. Warszawa: C.H. Beck.
• Kotler, Ph., & Keller, K. L. (2012). Marketing management. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
• Kotler, Ph., Armstrong, G., Saundres, J. A., & Wong, V. (2003). Principles of marketing (European Edition). Hoboken: Pearson Education.
• Kotler, Ph., Kartajaya, H., & Setiawan, I. (2021). Marketing 5.0. Technology for humanity. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
• Koźmiński, A. K. (1999). Zarządzanie międzynarodowe. Konkurencja w klasie światowej. Warszawa: PWE.
• Kwak, H., Forman, H., & Zinkhan, G. M. (2009). Consumer attitudes towards firms’ marketing activites: The implication for marketing communications strategies. International Journal of Internet Marketing and Advertising, 5(3), 131. doi: 10.1504/IJIMA.2009.026367.
• Legal Newspaper (in Ukrainian) (2023). Available from: https://yur-gazeta.com/golovna/import- tovariv-z-rosiyi-do-ukrayini-zris-na-40-eksport–na-10.html (accessed 12 January 2023).
• Lim, W. M., Chien Chin, M. W., Seng Ee, Y., Fung, C. Y., Giang, C. S., Heng, K. S., & Kong, M. L. (2022). What is at stake in a war? A perspective evaluation of the Ukraine and Russia conflict for business and society. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 41(6), 23–36. doi:10.1002/joe.22162.
• Lonardo, L. (2023). Russia’s 2022 war against Ukraine and the foreign policy reaction of the EU: Context, diplomacy, and law. Cham: Springer Nature. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-18694-3.
• Luhtanen, R., & Crocker, J. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation one’s social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 302–318. doi: 10.1177/0146167292183006.
• Lukanienko, D., Chuzhykov, V., & Wozniak, M. G. (Eds) (2013), Convergence and Divergence in Europe: Polish and Ukrainian Cases. Kiev: KNEU.
• Lytvynova, I., Ignatyuk, A., Knir, M., & Liubkina, O. (2022). The impact of the war with Russia on the export/import of Ukraine and possible tools to restore the Ukrainian economy. Amazonia Investiga, 11(53), 16–25. doi: 10.34069/AI/2022.53.05.2.
• Maison, D. (2004). Utajone postawy konsumenckie. Gdańsk: GWP.
• Markus, S. (2022). Long term business implications of Russia’s war in Ukraine. Asian Business & Management, 21, 483–487. doi: 10.1057/s41291-022-00181-7.
• Mazurek-Łopacińska, K. (2021). Zachowania konsumentów na współczesnym rynku. Perspektywa marketingowa. Warszawa: PWE.
• Merton, R. K., & Rossi, A. S. (1968). Contributions to the theory of reference group behaviour. New York: The Free Press.
• More than a third of Ukrainians boycott Russian goods (in Ukrainian) (2014). Hazeta Ukrainska pravda, available from: https://www.pravda.com.ua/news/2014/05/15/7025437 (accessed 12 January 2023).
• Mróz, B. (2013). Konsument w globalnej gospodarce. Trzy perspektywy. Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH.
• Mullen, B., & Johnson, C. (1990). The psychology of consumer behaviour. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrance Erlbaum Associates.
• National Democratic Institute (2022). Available from: https://www.kiis.com.ua/materials/pr/20220920_o/ August%202022_wartime%20survey%20Public%20fin%20UKR.pdf (accessed 21 February 2023).
• Nicosia, F. M. (1966). Consumer decision process: Marketing and advertisin implication. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
• Olejniczuk-Merta, A., & Noga, A. (2020). Inwestycyjny wymiar konsumpcji. Warszawa: Poltext.
• Pajuste, A., & Toniolo, A. (2022). Corporate response to the war in Ukraine: Stakeholder governance or stakeholder pressure? European corporate governance Institute, Finance Working Paper, 839/ 2022. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4183604.
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Iowa: WCB.
• Plutchik, R. (2001). The Nature of Emotions: Human emotions have deep evolutionary roots, a fact that may explain their complexity and provide tools for clinical practice. American Scientist, 89(4), 344–350. doi: 10.1511/2001.28.344.
• Poll: support for the ATO and boycott of Russian goods is growing among Ukrainians (in Ukrainian) (2014). Hazeta Ukrainska pravda, available from: https://www.pravda.com.ua/news/2014/08/18/ 7035146/ (accessed 11 January 2023).
• Pratkanis, A. R., & Aronson, W. (2001). Age of propaganda: The everyday use and abuse of persuasion. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
• Prohorovs, A. (2022). Russia’s war in Ukraine: Consequences for European countries. Businesses and Economies, Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(7), 1–15. doi: 10.3390/jrfm15070295.
• Qaisrani, I. H., Qazi, B. H., & Abbas, H. (2023). A geopolitical war in Europe: Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and its implications. Journal of European Studies, 39(1), 1–15. doi: 10.56384/jes. v39i1.285.
• Reshetnikova, I. (2023). The theme of patriotism in marketing communications in the conditions of Russian aggression in Ukraine. Marketing i Rynek, 4(23), 13–22. doi: 10.33226/1231-7853.2023.4.2.
• Rosenberg, M. (1962). The association between self-esteem and anxiety. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 1(2), 135–152. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(62)90004-3.
• Rudnicki, L. (2012). Zachowania konsumenta na rynku. Warszawa: PWE.
• Sanak-Kosmowska, K. (2021). Evaluating social media marketing. Social proof and online buyer behaviour. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781003128052.
• Sanak-Kosmowska, K. (2023). #isoverparty: The consequences of brand boycotts for brands in the social media environment after Russia’s invasion in Ukraine. Journal of Marketing and Consumer Behaviour in Emerging Markets, 1(16), 22–38. doi: 10.7172/2449-6634.jmcbem.2023.1.2.
• Scott, W. A. (1959). Attitude change by response reinforcement replication and extension. Sociometry, 22, 219–229. doi:10.2307/2786049.
• Sharma, S., Shimp, T. A., & Shin, J. (1995). Consumer ethnocentrism: A test of antecendents and moderators. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1, 26–37. doi:10.1007/BF02894609.
• Shimp, T. A., & Sharma, S. (1987). Consumer ethnocentrism: Construction and validation of the CETSCALE. Journal of Marketing Research, 24(3), 280–289. doi: 10.1177/002224378702400304.
• Short, J. R. (2022). Geopolitical consequences of the war in Ukraine. Turkish Policy Quarterly, available from: http://transatlanticpolicy.com/article/1152/geopolitical-consequences-of-the-war-in- ukraine (accessed 11 January 2023).
• Smyczek, S., & Sowa, I. (2005). Konsument na rynku. Zachowania, modele, aplikacje. Warszawa: Difin.
• Solomon, R. R. (2006). Zachowania i zwyczaje konsumentow. Gliwice: Helion.
• State Statistics Service of Ukraine: Economic statistics (n.d.). Available from: https://ukrstat.gov.ua/ operativ/menu/menu_u/zed.htm (accessed 11 January 2023).
• Sumner, W. G. (1995). Naturalne sposoby poste˛powania w gromadzie. Warszawa: PWN.
• Sun, Q., Wu, F., Li, S., & Frewal, R. (2020). Consumer boycotts, country of origin, and product competition: Evidence from China’s automobile market. Management Science, 67(9), 5857–5877. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2020.3778.
• Survey shows majority of Ukrainians support boycott of goods from Russia (in Ukrainian) (2015). Available from: https://tsn.ua/ukrayina/bilshist-ukrayinciv-pidtrimuyut-boykot-tovariv-iz- rosiyi-doslidzhennya-420268.html (accessed 21 January 2023).
• Sweetin, V. H., Knowles, L. L., Summey, J. H., & McQueen, K. S. (2013). Willingness-to-punish the corporate brand for corporate social irresponsibility. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1822– 1830. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.003.
• Światowy, G. (2006). Zachowania konsumentów. Warszawa: PWE.
• Szromnik, A., & Wolanin-Jarosz, E. (2014). Etnocentryzm konsumencki na zglobalizowanym rynku – czynniki i procesy kształtowania. Marketing i Rynek, 4(2), 2–13.
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel, & W.G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson Hall.
• The European Commission presents its Opinions (2022). Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/ commission/presscorner (accessed 2 December 2022).
• Thaler, R. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economics Behavior and Organization, 1, 39–60. doi:10.1016/0167-2681(80)90051-7.
• Ukrainian World Congress calls for worldwide boycott of goods made in Russia (2014). Available from: https://www.ucc.ca/2014/05/14/ukrainian-world-congress-calls-for-worldwide-boycott-of- goods-made-in-russia/ (accessed 11 January 2023).
• Ukrinform (2022). Available from: https://www.ukrinform.ua/rubric-polytics/2122489-revolucia- gidnosti-zgadajmo-golovne.html (accessed 22 January 2023).
• Wolanin-Jarosz, E. (2015). Etnocentryzm konsumencki w środowisku międzynarodowym. Warszawa: Difin.
• Yale School Of Management (2022). Over 1000 companies have curtailed operations in Russia - but some remain. Yale University (Submitted for publication) Available at: https://som.yale.edu/ story/2022/over-1000-companies-have-curtailed-operations-russia-some-remain (accessed 11 January 2023).
• Zalega, T. (2012). Konsumpcja. Determinanty, teorie, modele. Warszawa: PWE.
• Zaleśkiewicz, T. (2022). Psychologia ekonomiczna. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

Identifiers

DOI

10.1108/CEMJ-02-2023-0086

Biblioteka Nauki

61650444