Why is digital transformation so slow? The shadow of dehumanization 2.0

• Authors: Wojciech Czakon , Natanya Meyer

Abstracts

EN

Purpose – In recent years we have seen major technological advancements including the launch of large language models such as ChatGPT and the popularity of the digital transformation topic among professionals and academics. Despite this, the pace of digital transformation is surprisingly slow. We aimed to identify behavioral antecedents of an organization’s sluggish digital transformation. Design/methodology/approach – We adopted the organizational level of analysis, which differs from prior analyses of technological revolutions that looked at the phenomenon from an aggregate labor market or society level of analysis. Findings – We identified dehumanization as a key construct useful in examining the behavioral impediments to digital transformation. We indicated that the traditionally dual understanding of dehumanization needs to incorporate the actual involvement of non-human agents in operational and decision-making processes in organizations. Originality/value – We complemented the predominant approach of digital transformation, which focuses on technology and related business model development, with a behavioral approach. We considered digital transformation as an extreme degree of change, similar to the Industrial Revolution. We paved the way for the conceptual development of dehumanization in the digital world and for developing managerial practices useful in alleviating concerns that impede the pace of digital transformation.

Keywords

EN

Digital transformation; Dehumanization; Adoption rate; Business models; Technology

• Publisher: Akademia Leona Koźmińskiego
• Journal: Central European Management Journal
• Year: 2024
• Volume: 32
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 339-349

Dates

published

2024

Contributors

author

Wojciech Czakon

• Jagiellonian University

author

Natanya Meyer

• University of Johannesburg

References

• Al-Amoudi, I., & Morgan, J. (2019). Realist responses to post-human society: Ex machina. New York: Routledge.
• Autor, D. H., Mindell, D. A., & Reynolds, E. (2023). The work of the future: Building better jobs in an age of intelligent machines. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychology, 84(2), 191–215. doi: 10.1037//0033-295x.84.2.191.
• Bandura, A. (1990). Selective activation and disengagement of moral control. Journal of Social Issues, 46(1), 27–46. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1990.tb00270.x.
• Batko, R., & Baliga-Nicholson, K. (2019). Digital innovation as the key factor in changing organizational identity into a digital organizational identity. Problemy Zarządzania, 17(4), 39–51. doi: 10.7172/1644-9584.84.3
• Borau, S., Otterbring, T., Laporte, S., & Fosso Wamba, S. (2021). The most human bot: Female gendering increases humanness perceptions of bots and acceptance of AI. Psychology and Marketing, 38(7), 1052–1068. doi: 10.1002/mar.21480.
• Brison, N., Stinglhamber, F., & Caesens, G. (2022). Organizational dehumanization. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology. doi: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.013.902.
• Caesens, G., Stinglhamber, F., Demoulin, S., & De Wilde, M. (2017). Perceived organizational support and employees’ well-being: The mediating role of organizational dehumanization. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26(4), 527–540. doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2017.1319817.
• Caselli, F. (1999). Technological revolutions. American Economic Review, 89(1), 78–102. doi: 10.1257/ aer.89.1.78.
• Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
• Chege, S. M., & Wang, D. (2020). Information technology innovation and its impact on job creation by SMEs in developing countries: An analysis of the literature review. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 32(3), 256–271. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2019.1651263.
• Chesbrough, H. (2010). Business model innovation: Opportunities and barriers. Long Range Planning, 43(2), 354–363. doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.010.
• Ciarli, T., Kenney, M., Massini, S., & Piscitello, L. (2021). Digital technologies, innovation, and skills: Emerging trajectories and challenges. Research Policy, 50(7), 104289. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2021.104289.
• Clifton, J., Glasmeier, A., & Gray, M. (2020). When machines think for us: The consequences for work and place. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 13(1), 3–23. doi: 10.1093/cjres/rsaa004.
• Dąbrowska, J., Almpanopoulou, A., Brem, A., Chesbrough, H., Cucino, V., Di Minin, A., . . . Ritala, P. (2022). Digital transformation, for better or worse: A critical multi-level research agenda. R&D Management, 52(5), 930–954. doi: 10.1111/radm.12531.
• De Stefano, V. (2018). ‘Negotiating the algorithm’: Automation, artificial intelligence and labour protection. (SSRN Scholarly Paper 3178233). doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3178233.
• Demir, S., Paksoy, T., & Kochan, C. (2021). A conceptual framework for Industry 4.0 (How it started, how is it evolving over time. In Logistics 4.0 Digital Transformation of Supply Chain Management (pp. 1–14). Taylor and Francis.
• Dosi, G., Piva, M., Virgillito, M. E., & Vivarelli, M. (2021). Embodied and disembodied technological change: The sectoral patterns of job-creation and job-destruction. Research Policy, 50(4), 104199. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2021.104199.
• Fernandes, C., Ferreira, J. J., Veiga, P. M., Kraus, S., & Dabić, M. (2022). Digital entrepreneurship platforms: Mapping the field and looking towards a holistic approach. Technology in Society, 70, 101979. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101979.
• Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance (p. xi-291). Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
• Filser, M., Kraus, S., Breier, M., Nenova, I., & Puumalainen, K. (2021). Business model innovation: Identifying foundations and trajectories. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(2), 891– 907. doi: 10.1002/bse.2660.
• Fritts, M., & Cabrera, F. (2021). AI recruitment algorithms and the dehumanization problem. Ethics and Information Technology, 23(4), 791–801. doi: 10.1007/s10676-021-09615-w.
• Gioia, D. A., & Thomas, J. B. (1996). Identity, image, and issue interpretation: Sensemaking during strategic change in academia. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(3), 370–403. doi: 10.2307/2393936.
• Guest, D., Knox, A., & Warhurst, C. (2022). Humanizing work in the digital age: Lessons from socio-technical systems and quality of working life initiatives. Human Relations, 75(8), 1461–1482. doi: 10.1177/00187267221092674.
• Hadida, A. L., Tarvainen, W., & Rose, J. (2015). Organizational improvisation: A consolidating review and framework. International Journal of Management Reviews, 17(4), 437–459. doi: 10.1111/ ijmr.12047.
• Hadjimichael, D. (2023). Improvisation in organization: A review with a phenomenological research agenda. In The Routledge Companion to Improvisation in Organizations. Routledge.
• Harmon-Jones, E., & Mills, J. (2019). An introduction to cognitive dissonance theory and an overview of current perspectives on the theory. In Cognitive dissonance: Reexamining a pivotal theory in psychology (2nd ed, pp. 3–24). American Psychological Association. doi: 10.1037/0000135-001.
• Hartmann, P. M., Zaki, M., Feldmann, N., & Neely, A. (2016). Capturing value from big data – a taxonomy of data-driven business models used by start-up firms. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 36(10), 1382–1406. doi: 10.1108/IJOPM-02-2014-0098.
• Haslam, N., & Loughnan, S. (2014). Dehumanization and infrahumanization. Annual Review of Psychology, 65(1), 399–423. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115045.
• Huotari, P., & Ritala, P. (2021). When to switch between subscription-based and ad-sponsored business models: Strategic implications of decreasing content novelty. Journal of Business Research, 129, 14–28. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.02.037.
• Jaiswal, A., Arun, C. J., & Varma, A. (2022). Rebooting employees: Upskilling for artificial intelligence in multinational corporations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 33(6), 1179–1208. doi: 10.1080/09585192.2021.1891114.
• Jedynak, M., Czakon, W., Kuźniarska, A., & Mania, K. (2021). Digital transformation of organizations: What do we know and where to go next?. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 34(3), 629–652. doi: 10.1108/JOCM-10-2020-0336.
• Jong, D. (2019). Civilization and its (Dys)contents: Savagery, technological progress and capitalism in industrial and information dystopias. Intersect: The Stanford Journal of Science, Technology, and Society, 12(3), 3. Available from: https://ojs.stanford.edu/ojs/index.php/intersect/article/view/1051
• Kallmuenzer, A., Mikhaylov, A., Chelaru, M., & Czakon, W. (2024). Adoption and performance outcome of digitalization in small and medium-sized enterprises. Review of Managerial Science. doi: 10.1007/s11846-024-00744-2.
• Karantzas, G. C., Simpson, J. A., & Haslam, N. (2023). Dehumanization: Beyond the intergroup to the interpersonal. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 32(6), 501–507. doi: 10.1177/ 09637214231204196.
• Kraus, S., Durst, S., Ferreira, J. J., Veiga, P., Kailer, N., & Weinmann, A. (2022). Digital transformation in business and management research: An overview of the current status quo. International Journal of Information Management, 63, 102466. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102466.
• Lagios, C., Caesens, G., Nguyen, N., & Stinglhamber, F. (2022). Explaining the negative consequences of organizational dehumanization. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 21(2), 86–93. doi: 10.1027/1866-5888/a000286.
• Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics: Concept, method and reality in social science; social equilibria and social change. Human Relations, 1(1), 5–41. doi: 10.1177/001872674700100103.
• Mbembe, A. (2021). Brutalismo (Achille Mbembe. N-1 Edições) [PHI000000], n-1 Editora e Distribuidora Ltda. Available from: http://www.n-1edicoes.org/shop/9786581097271-brutalismo-achille-mbembe-n-1-edicoes-phi000000-124399
• Morandini, S., Fraboni, F., De Angelis, M., Puzzo, G., Giusino, D., & Pietrantoni, L. (2023). The impact of artificial intelligence on workers’ skills: Upskilling and reskilling in organisations. Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 26, 039–068. doi: 10. 28945/5078.
• Nelson, D. (1977). Taylorism and the workers at bethlehem steel, 1898-1901. The Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography, 101(4), 487–505.
• O’Reilly III, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2011). Organizational ambidexterity in action: How managers explore and exploit. California Management Review, 53(4), 5–22. doi: 10.1525/cmr.2011.53.4.5.
• Perez, C., & Leach, T. (2022). The Luddite legacy: Why the initial diffusion of technologies does not predict the future of work. (Working Paper WP7-D7.2). UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose.
• Ravasi, D., & Phillips, N. (2011). Strategies of alignment: Organizational identity management and strategic change at Bang & Olufsen. Strategic Organization, 9(2), 103–135. doi: 10.1177/1476127011403453.
• Roth, S. (2019). Digital transformation of social theory. A research update. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 88–93. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.016.
• Schiavi, G. S., & Behr, A. (2018). Emerging technologies and new business models: A review on disruptive business models. Innovation and Management Review, 15(4), 338–355. doi: 10.1108/INMR-03-2018-0013.
• Schiavi, G. S., Behr, A., & Marcolin, C. B. (2019). Conceptualizing and qualifying disruptive business models. RAUSP Management Journal, 54(3), 269–286. doi: 10.1108/RAUSP-09-2018-0075.
• Schneider, S., & Kokshagina, O. (2021). Digital transformation: What we have learned (thus far) and what is next. Creativity and Innovation Management, 30(2), 384–411. doi: 10.1111/caim.12414.
• Sima, V., Gheorghe, I. G., Subić, J., & Nancu, D. (2020). Influences of the industry 4.0 revolution on the human capital development and consumer behavior: A systematic review. Sustainability, 12(10), 10, 4035. doi: 10.3390/su12104035.
• Skare, M., & Soriano, D. R. (2021). How globalization is changing digital technology adoption: An international perspective. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 6(4), 222–233. doi: 10.1016/j.jik. 2021.04.001.
• Taris, T. W., & Schreurs, P. J. G. (2009). Well-being and organizational performance: An organizational-level test of the happy-productive worker hypothesis. Work and Stress, 23(2), 120–136. doi: 10.1080/02678370903072555.
• Täuscher, K., & Laudien, S. M. (2018). Understanding platform business models: A mixed methods study of marketplaces. European Management Journal, 36(3), 319–329. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2017.06.005.
• Trenerry, B., Chng, S., Wang, Y., Suhaila, Z. S., Lim, S. S., Lu, H. Y., & Oh, P. H. (2021). Preparing workplaces for digital transformation: An integrative review and framework of multi-level factors. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 620766. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.620766.
• Tucker, M., Fixson, S., & Brown, G. (2020). Four skills tomorrow’s innovation workforce will need – ProQuest. MIT Sloan Management Review, 61(2), 1–7.
• Van De Voorde, K., Paauwe, J., & Van Veldhoven, M. (2012). Employee well-being and the HRM– organizational performance relationship: A review of quantitative studies. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(4), 391–407. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00322.x.
• van Houwelingen, G., & Stoelhorst, J. W. (2023). Digital is different: Digitalization undermines stakeholder relations because it impedes firm anthropomorphization. Academy of Management Discoveries, 9(3), 297–319. doi: 10.5465/amd.2021.0245.
• Väyrynen, T., & Laari-Salmela, S. (2018). Men, mammals, or machines? Dehumanization embedded in organizational practices. Journal of Business Ethics, 147(1), 95–113. doi: 10.1007/s10551-015- 2947-z.
• Venkatesh, V. (2022). Adoption and use of AI tools: A research agenda grounded in UTAUT. Annals of Operations Research, 308(1), 641–652. doi: 10.1007/s10479-020-03918-9.
• Vial, G. (2021). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. In Managing Digital Transformation. Routledge.
• Williams, M. D., Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2015). The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): A literature review. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28(3), 443–488. doi: 10.1108/JEIM-09-2014-0088.
• Witzel, M., & Warner, M. (2015). Taylorism revisited: Culture, management theory and paradigm-shift. Journal of General Management, 40(3), 55–70. doi: 10.1177/030630701504000305.
• World Economic Forum (2023). The future of jobs report 2023. World Economic Forum. Available from: https://www.weforum.org/publications/the-future-of-jobs-report-2023/
• Zhang, J., & Chen, Z. (2023). Exploring human resource management digital transformation in the digital age. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15(1), 1482–1498. doi: 10.1007/s13132-023-01214-y.
• Zolas, N., Kroff, Z., Brynjolfsson, E., McElheran, K., Beede, D. N., Buffington, C., . . . Dinlersoz, E. (2020). Advanced technologies adoption and use by US Firms: Evidence from the annual business survey. (Working Paper 28290). National Bureau of Economic Research. doi: 10.3386/w28290.

Identifiers

DOI

10.1108/CEMJ-03-2024-0073

Biblioteka Nauki

55992719