Parmenide e l’Uovo argenteo degli Orfici in Simplicio, Damascio e Proclo

• Authors: Ivan Adriano Licciardi

Abstracts

EN

When commenting on Aristotle Ph. 1.3, 187a1, Simplicius in Ph. 1.3, 146, 29–147,2 establishes an equivalence between the shining «silver egg» (ὤεον ἀργύφεον) of Orpheus (fr. 70 Kern) and the Parmenidean being or, rather, one of the determinations with which Parmenides, in the section of his Poem devoted to the so-called Way of Truth, indicates the ἐόν, i.e., «resembling the mass of a well-rounded sphere» (εὐκύκλου σφαίρης ἐναλίγκιον ὄγκωι – DK 28 B 8.43). The equivalence established here is found in the great digression about Parmenides (in Ph. 142, 28–148, 24), where Simplicius puts forward an interpretation of Parmenides that identifies the Parmenidean being-one (τὸ ἓν ὄν) with the intelligible (τὸ νοητόν), which, in another passages of the same commentary, is also qualified with the metaphysical concept of “unified” (τὸ ἡνωμένον) that is taken from Damascius. The aim of the present paper is to trace back the Neo-Platonic assumptions of this identification. In particular, we will focus on Damascius Pr. 2.55.40, 14–19 and 3.123.160, 1–3 Westerink, since these passages contain insights into the Orphic theology that is referred to as “usual”, “common” or “rhapsodic”, as well as a contextual “translation” of various Orphic concepts (e.g. ὤεον ἀργύφεον) in terms of Neo-Platonic metaphysics. The metaphysical transposition of the mythical image of the silver egg goes back, however, to Proclus (in Ti. 1.428, 8–9), who assumes the identity between Plato’s being (“being in the primary sense”, τὸ πρώτως [...] ὄν) and the Orphic egg (ταὐτὸν τό τε Πλάτωνος ὂν καὶ τὸ Ὀρφικὸν ὠόν). One cannot, at the same time, exclude a priori the possibility that the Orphic motif of the silver egg circulated in the Magna Graecia of Parmenides already from at least the 6th century BC. It is possible, as Colli hypothesised, that already Ibycus (who certainly knew Orpheus, fr. 25 Page) betrays a certain knowledge of it in fr. 4.4–5 Page, where we find the expression ἐν ὠέωι ἀργυρέωι. This article demonstrates that Proclus and Damascius embedded the Orphic concept of ὤεον ἀργύφεον into their Neo-Platonic metaphysics by showing its potential for speculative order.

Keywords

EN

Egg; Orphism; Parmenides; Proclus; Damascius; Simplicius

• Publisher: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
• Journal: Peitho. Examina Antiqua
• Year: 2023
• Volume: 14
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 99-124

Dates

published

2023

Contributors

author

Ivan Adriano Licciardi

• University of Catania

References

• Abbate, M. (cur.), 2004, Proclo. Commento alla Repubblica di Platone, Milano.
• Abbate, M. (cur.), 2017, Commento al Cratilo di Platone, Firenze–Milano.
• Abbate, M. (cur.), 2019, Proclo, Teologia Platonica, Firenze–Milano.
• Abbate, M., 2008, Il divino tra unit. e molteplicit.. Saggio sulla Teologia Platonica di Proclo, Alessandria.
• Abbate, M., 2010, Parmenide e i neoplatonici. Dall’Essere all’Uno e al di l. dell’Uno, Alessandria.
• Ahbel-Rappe, S. (transl.), 2010, Damascius’ Problems & Solutions Concerning First Principles, New York.
• Beierwaltes, W., 19902, Proclo. I fondamenti della sua metafisica, Milano.
• Bernabé, A., 2002, “Orphisme et Présocratiques: bilan et perspectives d’un dialogue complexe”, in: A. Laks, C. Louguet (ed.), Qu’est-ce que la Philosophie Pr.socratique? What is Presocratic Philosophy?, Lille, pp. 205–247.
• Bonazzi, M., 2015, Il platonismo, Torino.
• Brisson, L., 1985. “La figure de Chronos dans la théogonie orphique et ses antécédents iraniens”, in: D. Tiffeneau (ed.), Mythes et repr.sentation du temps, Paris, pp. 37–55.
• Brisson, L., 1987, “Proclus et l’Orphisme, dans Proclus. Lecteur et interprète des anciens”, in: J. Pépin, H. D. Saffrey, Actes du Colloque international du CNRS, Paris (2–4 octobre 1985), Paris, pp. 47–51.
• Brisson, L., 1995, “Damascius et l’Orphisme”, in: L. Brisson, Orph.e et l’Orphisme dans l’Antiquit. gr.coromaine, Aldershot, pp. 157–209.
• Brisson, L., 2008, “El lugar, la funci.n y la significaci.n del orfismo en el neoplatonismo”, in: A. Bernabé, F. Casades.s (eds.), Orfeo y la tradici.n .rfica. Un reencuentro, Madrid, pp. 1491–1516.
• Cerri, G., 1995, “Cosmologia dell’Ade in Omero, Esiodo e Parmenide”, La Parola del passato 280, pp. 437–467.
• Colli, G., 20054 (19771), La sapienza greca, vol. I: Dioniso, Apollo, Eleusi, Orfeo, Museo, Iperborei, Enigma, Milano.
• Dalsgaard Larsen, B., 1972a, Jamblique de Chalcis. Ex.g.te et philosophe Aarhus
• Dalsgaard Larsen, B., 1972b, Jamblique de Chalcis. Ex.g.te et philosophe. Appendice: Testimonia et fragmenta exegetica, Aarhus.
• Deuse, W., 1973, Theodorus von Asine. Sammlung der Testimonien und Kommentar, Wiesbaden.
• Dillon, J. M. (ed.), 1973, Iamblichi Chalcidensis in Platonis dialogos commentariorum fragmenta, Leiden.
• Dörrie, H., Baltes, M., 1993, Der Platonismus in der Antike. Grundlagen – System – Entwicklung, Vol. III:
• Der Platonismus im 2. Und 3. Jahrhundert nach Christus. Bausteine 73–100: Text, .bersetzung, Kommentar, Stuttgart–Bad Cannstatt.
• Giannantoni, G. (cur.), 1979, I Presocratici. Testimonianze e frammenti, vol. I, Bari.
• Guérard, C., 1982, “La théorie des hénades et la mystique de Proclus”, Dyonisius 6, pp. 73–82.
• Herrero de Jáuregui, M., 2010, Orphism and Christianity in Late Antiquity, Berlin–New York. Igal, J., 1985 (19992), Plotino, En.adas III–IV, Madrid.
• Kern, O. (coll.), 1922, Orphicorum fragmenta, Berolini.
• Kroll, W. (ed.), 1899–1901, Proclus, in Platonis Rempublicam commentarii, vol. I–II, Leipzig.
• Licciardi, I. A., 2016, Parmenide tr.dito, Parmenide trad.to nel Commentario di Simplicio alla Fisica di Aristotele, Sankt Augustin.
• Licciardi, I. A., 2017, Critica dell’apparente e critica apparente. Simplicio interprete di Parmenide nel Commentario al de Caelo di Aristotele, Sankt Augustin.
• Licciardi, I. A., 2019, “Sull’attribuzione e sull’utilità dell’argomento eleatico della dicotomia: Simplicio, in Phys. 138, 3–141, 11 contro Alessandro e Porfirio”, Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica 111, pp. 317–330.
• Majercik, R., 1989, The Chaldean Oracles. Text, Translation and Commentary, Leiden.
• Mihai, A., 2014, “Comparatism in the Neoplatonic Pantheon of Late Antiquity: Damascius, De Princ. III 159.6–167.25”, Numen 61, pp. 457–483.
• Napoli, V., 2008, Ἐπέκεινα τοῦ ἑνός. Il principio totalmente ineffabile tra dialettica ed esegesi in Damascio, Catania–Palermo.
• Reale, G., 1989, Introduzione a Proclo, Roma–Bari.
• Ricciardelli, G. (trad.), 20123, Inni Orfici, Milano (1a ediz. Milano 2000).
• Ricciardelli, G. (trad.), 2018, Esiodo, Teogonia, Milano.
• Romano, F., 1985, Porfirio e la fisica aristotelica, Catania (In appendice la traduzione dei frammenti e delle testimonianze del Commentario alla Fisica).
• Romano, F., 1998, Il neoplatonismo, Roma.
• Runia, D. T., Share, M. (ed.), 2008, Proclus, Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus, vol. II, Book 2: Proclus on the causes of the Cosmos and its Creation, Cambridge–New York.
• Saffrey H. D., Westerink L. G., 1968, Proclus, Th.ologie platonicienne, vol. I, Paris.
• Scarpi, P. (cur.), 2002, Le religioni dei Misteri, vol. I: Eleusi, Dionisismo, Orfismo, Milano.
• Steel, C., 1992, “Le Sophiste comme texte théologique dans l’interpretation de Proclus”, in: E. P. Bos, P. A. Meijer (eds.), On Proclus & his Influence in Medieval Philosophy, Leiden–New York–Köln, pp. 51–64.
• Van Riel, G., 2000, “Ontologie et théologie. Le ‘Phil.be’ dans le troisième livre de la Th.ologie Platonicienne de Proclus”, in: A. Ph. Segonds, C. Steel (eds.), Proclus et la Théologie Platonicienne, Leuven–Paris, pp. 15–27.
• Westerink, L. G. (ed.), Combès, J. (trad.), 1986, Damascius, Trait. des Premiers Principes, vol. I: De l’ineffable et de l’un, Paris.
• Westerink, L. G. (ed.), Combès, J. (trad.), 1989, Damascius, Trait. des Premiers Principes, vol. II: De la triade et de l’unifi., Paris.
• Westerink, L. G. (ed.), Combès, J. (trad.), 1991, Damascius. Trait. des Premiers Principes, vol. III: De la procession, Paris
• Westerink, L. G., 1959, Lectures on the Philebus wrongly attribuited to Olimpiodorus, Amsterdam (rist. 1982).
• Westerink, L. G.,1978, Proclus, Th.ologie platonicienne, vol. III, Paris.

Identifiers

DOI

10.14746/PEA.2023.1.6

Biblioteka Nauki

28408733