Dyskurs obywatelstwa w podręcznikach do kształcenia literaturowego w gimnazjum. Krytyczna analiza dyskursu

• Authors: Monika Popow

Title variants

EN

The Discourse of Citizenship in Literature Text Books in High Schools. A Critical Analysis of the Discourse

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

PL

The paper gives an ironic and short, both empirical and normative analysis of current Polish home education intertwined with a metaanalysis of the role of metaphors in the language of the educational sciences. Entomological metaphor of subimago helps here in revealing the social status quo of the mentioned „home education” in Poland. One can describe socioeducational reality using different forms of expression. Metaphorization is one of them, not always adequate, but indispensable as well as cognitively pleasant.

EN

The paper gives an ironic and short, both empirical and normative analysis of current Polish home education intertwined with a metaanalysis of the role of metaphors in the language of the educational sciences. Entomological metaphor of subimago helps here in revealing the social status quo of the mentioned „home education” in Poland. One can describe socioeducational reality using different forms of expression. Metaphorization is one of them, not always adequate, but indispensable as well as cognitively pleasant. 

Keywords

EN

citizenship; textbooks; critical discourse analysis

• Publisher: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
• Journal: Kultura-Społeczeństwo-Edukacja
• Year: 2012
• Volume: 2
• Pages: 151-171

Dates

published

2012-12-10

Contributors

author

Monika Popow

• Uniwersytet Gdański

References

• Apple M.W., L.K. Christain-Smith. 1991. The Politics of the Textbook. W The Politics of the Textbook. London - New York.
• ---
• Burszta W.J., J. Nowak, K. Wawruch. 2002. Od narodu szlacheckiego do państwa narodowego. W Polska refleksja nad narodem: wybór tekstów. Poznań.
• ---
• Gee J.P. 2005. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. London.
• ---
• Giroux H. 1992. Border Crossings. Cultural Workers and the Politics of Education. London, New York.
• ---
• Gromadzka B. 2006. „Podręczniki szkolne do literatury jako narzędzie wprowadzania w tradycję. Na podstawie podręczników do romantyzmu wydanych po 1945 roku”. Biblioteka Literacka Poznańskich Studiów Polonistycznych 42.
• ---
• Gupta A., J. Ferguson. 1992. „Beyond “Culture”: Space, Identity, and the Politics of Difference”. Cultural Anthropology 7 (1).
• ---
• Krytyczna analiza dyskursu. Interdyscyplinarne podejście do komunikacji społecznej. 2008. Red. A. Duszak, N. Fairclugh. Kraków.
• ---
• Jones S. 2011. Gendered Discourses of Entrepreneurship in HE: The Fictive Entrepreneur and the Fictive Student, Institute for Small Business and Entrepreneurship. Institute for Small Business and Entrepreneurship (ISBE) 34th International conference, November, Sheffield (Refereed).
• ---
• Marciniak Z. 2011. O potrzebie reformy programowej kształcenia ogólnego. Warszawa
• ---
• Sekuła P. 2009. Kultura polityczna a konsolidacja demokracji. Kraków
• ---
• Sowa J., K. Szadkowski. 2012. Fabryki wiedzy. W EduFactory. Kraków.

Identifiers

DOI

10.14746/kse.2012.2.11