Jak badać akwizycję języka obcego w klasie, czyli o zadaniu w perspektywie badań ilościowych i jakościowych

• Authors: Sebastian Piotrowski

Title variants

EN

How to investigate language acquisition in the classroom? Quantitative and qualitative perspectives on language task

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

EN

In studies on second language acquisition in formal settings, techniques characteristic of both qualitative and quantitative research paradigms are applied. In the first part of the article, we present general reflection on the methodology of studies on second language acquisition, with a particular emphasis on the role of exploratory research in the analysis of the process of second language teaching/learning in formal settings. In the second part, we present the concept of task, stressing its usefulness as a basic unit of analysis of the corpus of linguistic data obtained in the classroom.

Keywords

PL

metodologia badań; akwizycja języka obcego

EN

classroom-centered research; research methodology; foreign language acquisition; classroom-centred research; classroom-centered research; research methodology; foreign language acquisition; classroom-centred research

• Publisher: Polskie Towarzystwo Neofilologiczne
• Journal: Neofilolog
• Year: 2009
• Issue: 32
• Pages: 127-138

Dates

published

2019-09-24

Contributors

author

Sebastian Piotrowski

• Instytut Filologii Romańskiej, KUL

References

• Allwright, R. L. 1983. „Classroom-centered research on language teaching and learning: A brief historical overview”. TESOL Quarterly 17. 191-204.
• Chaudron, C. 1986. „The interaction of quantitative and qualitative approaches to research: A view of the second language classroom”. TESOL Quarterly 20. 709-717.
• Chaudron, C. i Valcárcel, M. 1988. A process-product study of communicative language teaching (Final report submitted to the Comite Conjunto Hispano-Norteamericano para la Cooperación Cultural y Educativa, Madrid). Murcia, Espagne: Universidad de Murcia, Escuela Universitaria de Magisterio.
• Cook, T. D. i Reichardt, C. S. (red.). 1979. Qualitative and quantitative methods in evaluation research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
• Dausendschőn-Gay, U., Gűlich, E. i Kraft, E. (red.). 1991. Linguistische Interaktionsanalysen. Tűbingen: Niemeyer.
• Doughty, C. J. i Pica, T. 1985. „Input and interaction in the communicative language classroom: A comparison of teacher-fronted and group activities”, w: Gass, S. i Madden, C. (red.). 1985. 115-135.
• Doughty, C. J. i Pica, T. 1986. „Information-gap tasks: Do they facilitate second language acquisition?”. TESOL Quarterly 20. 305-325.
• Ellis, R. 1990. Instructed second language acquisition. Oxford. Blackwell.
• Fotos, S. i Ellis, R. 1991. „Communicating about grammar: A task-based approach”. TESOL Quarterly 25. 605-628.
• Gaonac’h, D. (red.). 1990. Acquisition et utilisation d’une langue étrangère. L’approche cognitive. Paris: Hachette.
• Gass, S. i Madden, C. (red.). 1985. Input in second language acquisition. Rowely, MA, Newbury House.
• Germain, C. 1999. „Structure fondamentale de l’enseignement d’une langue étrangère ou seconde”. Etudes de linguistique appliquée 114. 171-187.
• Grassi, R. 2007. Parlare all’allievo straniero. Strategie di adattamento linguistico nella classe plurilingue. Perugia: Guerra Edizioni.
• Gűlich, E. 1991. „Pour une ethnométhodologie linguistique: description de séquences conversationnelles explicatives”, w: Dausendschőn-Gay, U., Gűlich, E. i Kraft, E. (red.). 1991. 325-364.
• Huberman, A. M. i Miles, M. B. 1991. Analyse des données qualitatives. Bruxelles: De Boeck (tłum. De Backer, C. i Lamongie, V.).
• Hymes, D. (red.). 1966. Language in culture and society. A reader in linguistics and anthropology. New-York: Harper & Row.
• Klein, W. i Perdue, C. 1997. „The basic variety (or: Couldn’t natural languages be much simpler?)”. Second Language Research 13. 301-348.
• Krieger-Knieja, J. i Paprocka-Piotrowska, U. (red.). 2006. Komunikacja językowa w społeczeństwie komunikacyjnym. Nowe wyzwania dla dydaktyki języków obcych.
• Lublin: Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL.
• Labov, W. 1993. Le parler ordinaire. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit. (tłum. Kihm, A.).
• Larsen-Freeman, D. i Long, M. H. 1991. An introduction to second language acquisition research. London: Longman.
• Nunan, D. 1991. „Communicative tasks and the language curriculum”. TESOL Quarterly 25. 279-295.
• Pekarek, S. 1998. „Ritualisation du discours et conditions d’acquisition en classe de L2”, w: Souchon, M. (red.). 1998. 79-89.
• Perdue, C. (red.). 1982. Second language acquisition by adult immigrants. A field manual. Strasbourg: European Science Foundation.
• Piotrowski, S. 2006a. Gestion des tâches et mode d’accès à la langue. L’apprentissage du français en milieu institutionnel polonais. Lublin: Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL.
• Piotrowski, S. 2006b „Uniformizacja zadań językowych w klasie języka drugiego”, w: Krieger-Knieja, J. i Paprocka-Piotrowska, U. (red.). 2006. 194-201.
• Pienemann, M. 1989. „Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses”. Applied Linguistics 10. 52-79.
• Reichardt, C. S. i Cook, T. D. 1979. „Beyond qualitative versus quantitative methods”, w: Cook, T. D. i Reichardt, C. S. (red.). 1979. 7-32.
• Rosen, E. 2006. Le point sur le Cadre européen commun de référence pour les langues. Paris: CLE International.
• Souchon, M. (red.). 1998. Pratiques discursives et acquisition des langues étrangères. Actes du Xème colloque international „Acquisition d’une langue étrangère: perspectives et recherches”. Besançon, Université de Franche-Comté: Centre de linguistique appliquée.

Identifiers

DOI

10.14746/n.2009.32.10