Prodicus at the Crossroads. Once Again on the Antilogy

• Authors: Stefania Giombini

Title variants

EN

Prodicus at the Crossroads. Once Again on the Antilogy

• Languages of publication: IT

Abstracts

IT

The aim of this paper is to analyze the tale of Heracles at the Crossroads, attributed to Prodicus by Socrates in Xenophon’s Memorabilia, through the notion of antilogy. The apologue has got an antilogic structure that is immediately outlined in the description of the situation in which the young Heracles finds himself. But the text, seemingly antilogic, does not develop itself according to one of the most important rules of antilogies, i.e., the epistemic parity of two speeches, since it appears to be completely in favor of just one of the theses. Prodicus would have had no interest in writing a text that did not demonstrate his rhetorical and linguistic abilities. According to this perspective, Xenophon’s version of Heracles at the Crossroads does not seem to be the original version by Prodicus, as can be seen by analyzing its structure and properties.

EN

The aim of this paper is to analyze the tale of Heracles at the Crossroads, attributed to Prodicus by Socrates in Xenophon’s Memorabilia, through the notion of antilogy. The apologue has got an antilogic structure that is immediately outlined in the description of the situation in which the young Heracles finds himself. But the text, seemingly antilogic, does not develop itself according to one of the most important rules of antilogies, i.e., the epistemic parity of two speeches, since it appears to be completely in favor of just one of the theses. Prodicus would have had no interest in writing a text that did not demonstrate his rhetorical and linguistic abilities. According to this perspective, Xenophon’s version of Heracles at the Crossroads does not seem to be the original version by Prodicus, as can be seen by analyzing its structure and properties.

Keywords

EN

Prodicus; Antilogy; Xenophon; Heracles; Horai; Sophists

• Publisher: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
• Journal: Peitho. Examina Antiqua
• Year: 2017
• Volume: 8
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 187-200

Dates

published

2017-10-24

Contributors

author

Stefania Giombini

• University of Girona

References

• Aronadio, F. (ed.), 2008, Platone. Dialoghi Spuri, Torino
• Decleva Caizzi, F. (ed.), 1966, Antisthenis Fragmenta, Milano–Varese.
• Del Corso, L., 2005, La lettura nel mondo ellenistico, Roma–Bari.
• De Romilly, J., 1986, “Les manies de Prodicos et la rigueur de la langue grecque”, Museum Helveticum 43, pp. 1–18.
• Dorion, L.-A., 2008, “Héraclès entre Prodicos et Xénophon”, Philosophie Antique 8, pp. 85–114
• Dumont, J.-P. (ed.), 1988, Les Présocratiques, Paris.
• Eichholz, D. E., 1935, “The Pseudo-Platonic Dialogue Eryxias”, The Classical Quarterly 29, pp. 129–149.
• Giombini, S., 2010, s.v. “Antilogia”, in: P. Radici Colace, P., S. M. Medaglia, L. Rossetti, S. Sconocchia (eds), Dizionario delle scienze e delle tecniche di Grecia e Roma, Pisa–Roma, pp. 141–142.
• Giombini, S., 2012, Gorgia epidittico. Commento filosofico all’Encomio di Elena, all’Apologia di Palamede, all’Epitaffio, Passignano sul T.
• Giombini, S., Marcacci, M., 2010, “Dell’antilogia”, in Giombini, S., – Marcacci, F., (eds.), Il V secolo. Studi di filosofia antica in onore di Livio Rossetti, Passignano sul T., pp. 277-294.
• Giombini, S., Marcacci, M., 2012, La legge, la colpa, l’errore. La tetralogia B (ovvero del giavellotto) di Antifonte Sofista, Passignano sul T.
• Gomperz, H., 1912, Sophistik und Rhetorik, Leipzig.
• Gray, V., 2006, “The Linguistic Philosophies of Prodicus in Xenophon’s Choice of Heracles?”, Classical Quarterly 56, pp. 426–435
• Guidorizzi, G., (ed.), 2009, Il mito greco, vol. 1: Gli dèi, Milano.
• Hegel, G. W. F., 1932, Lezioni sulla storia della filosofia, vol. 2: Dai Sofisti agli Scettici, tr. it. di E. Codignola, G. Sanna, Firenze.
• Joël, K., 1893–1901, Der echte und der xenophontische Sokrates, Berlin.
• Lachance, G., 2016, “Sur l’unité des Dissoi Logoi 1–5”, Phoenix 70, pp. 290–301.
• Laks, A., Most, G. (eds.), 2016, Les débuts de la philosophie. Des premiers penseurs grecs à Socrate, Paris.
• Maddalena, A., Sillitti, G. (eds.), 2004, Platone. Opere Complete, vol. 8: Lettere, Definizioni, Dialoghi Spuri, Bari (19661).
• Marsico, C. (ed.), 2014, Filόsofos Socráticos. Testimonios y Fragmentos. II. Antístenes, Fedόn, Esquines y Simόn, Buenos Aires.
• Martano, G., 1985, “L’ambivalenza del logos e l’esigenza della scelta: Gorgia, Prodico, Luciano”, in: L. Montoneri, F. Romano (eds.), Gorgia e la Sofistica. Atti del Convegno Internazionale (Lentini-Catania, 12–15 dicembre 1983), Catania, pp. 273–282.
• Nestle, W., 1936, “Die Horen des Prodikos”, Hermes 71, pp. 151–170.
• Papageorgiou, N., 2004, “Prodicus and the Agon of the Logoi in Aristophanes’ Clouds”, Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica 78, pp. 61–69.
• Picard, C., 1951, “Représentations antiques de l’Apologue dit de Prodicus”, Comptes rendus des séances de l’Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres 95, pp. 310–322.
• Prinzivalli, E. (ed.), 2005, Didimo il Cieco, Lezioni sui Salmi. Il “Commento ai Salmi” scoperto a Tura, Milano.
• Rochette, B., 1998, “Héraclès à la croisée des chemins. Un τόπος dans la littérature gréco-latine”, Les Études Classiques 66, pp. 105–113.
• Sansone, D., 2004, “Heracles at the Y”, The Journal of Hellenic Studies 124, pp. 125–142.
• Tordesillas, A., 2008, “Socrate et Prodicos dans les Mémorables de Xénophon”, in: M. Narcy, A. Tordesillas (eds.), Xénophon et Socrate, Actes du Colloque d’Aix-en-Provence (6–9 novembre 2003), Paris, pp. 87–110.
• Turner, E., 1977, “I libri nell’Atene del V e IV secolo a.C.”, in: G. Cavallo (ed.), Libri, editori e pubblico nel mondo antico. Guida storica e critica, Roma–Bari (19751), pp. 3–24.
• Untersteiner, M., 2009, Sofisti. Testimonianze e frammenti, Milano.
• Zeppi, S., 1955, “Un passo delle Leggi e la filosofia di Prodico”, Rivista Critica di Storia della Filosofia 10, pp. 213–222.
• Zeppi, S., 1956, “L’etica di Prodico”, Rivista Critica di Storia della Filosofia 11, pp. 265–272.

Identifiers

DOI

10.14746/pea.2017.1.11