O egzystencji w dziele literackim i o egzystencji dzieła

• Authors: Jacek Wachowski

Title variants

EN

On the existence of literary work and on existence in literary work

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

PL

The concept of existence is rooted in (at least) two traditions: philosophical and literary theory. This does not mean, however, that it means the same for both fields. The first tradition is wide ranging because it includes diverse – physical, emotional and spiritual (as well as intellectual) – aspects of being. The second tradition is narrow and it closely refers to literary output. Literary existence – which is based on physical reality – is permanently separated from it. Literature refers to the representation and imagination of the world, not to the empirical experience of physical reality. In addition, literature does not apply the categories of truth and falsehood that we know from social reality (because literary existence stands, beyond the assertion). It is also imprisoned in genology – inscribed in the genre. Literary existence has more to do with poetry, style, artistic convention than what philosophers are examining. Sometimes great literary works deal with great philosophical problems, but sometimes do not and it do not detract from their artistic nature. Both of these tradition – literary and philosophical – however, have many common places, require careful study and analysis. The article is an attempt to show these places and characterize their features.

EN

The concept of existence is rooted in (at least) two traditions: philosophical and literary theory. This does not mean, however, that it means the same for both fields. The first tradition is wide ranging because it includes diverse – physical, emotional and spiritual (as well as intellectual) – aspects of being. The second tradition is narrow and it closely refers to literary output. Literary existence – which is based on physical reality – is permanently separated from it. Literature refers to the representation and imagination of the world, not to the empirical experience of physical reality. In addition, literature does not apply the categories of truth and falsehood that we know from social reality (because literary existence stands, beyond the assertion). It is also imprisoned in genology – inscribed in the genre. Literary existence has more to do with poetry, style, artistic convention than what philosophers are examining. Sometimes great literary works deal with great philosophical problems, but sometimes do not and it do not detract from their artistic nature. Both of these tradition – literary and philosophical – however, have many common places, require careful study and analysis. The article is an attempt to show these places and characterize their features.

Keywords

PL

existence; being; literary theory; philosophy

EN

existence; being; literary theory; philosophy; existence; being; literary theory; philosophy

• Publisher: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
• Journal: Przestrzenie Teorii
• Year: 2017
• Issue: 28

Dates

published

2018-05-08

Contributors

author

Jacek Wachowski

References

• Arystoteles, Poetyka 1450a, 25, tłum. H. Podbielski, BN seria II, nr 209, Wrocław 1983.
• Austin J.A., Jak działać za pomocą słów, [w:] tegoż, Mówienie i poznawanie, tłum. J. Woleński, Warszawa 1993, s. 550–708.
• Bartol K., Wypędzić poezję, wygnać poetów. Współczesne interpretacje Platońskiego postulatu, „Poznańskie Studia Polonistyczne” Seria Literacka, 2012, nr 19, s. 13–30.
• Brentano F., Psychologia z empirycznego punktu widzenia, tłum. W. Galewicz, Warszawa 1999.
• Chrudzimski A., Intentionalität, Zeitbewusstsein und Intersubjektivität. Studien zur Phänomenologie von Brentano bis Ingarden, Frankfurt 2005.
• Chrudzimski Z., Teoria intencjonalności Romana Ingardena, „Edukacja Filozoficzna” 1998, 25, s. 249–250.
• Deleuze G., Różnica i powtórzenie, tłum. B. Banasiak, K. Matuszewski, Warszawa 1997.
• Gawroński A., Dlaczego Platon wykluczył poetów z państwa? U źródeł współczesnych badań nad językiem, przedmowa Z. Kubiak, Warszawa 1984.
• Hopensztand D., Mowa pozornie zależna w kontekście „Czarnych skrzydeł”, [w:] Stylistyka teoretyczna w Polsce, red. K. Budzyk. Warszawa 1946.
• Husserl E., Vorlesungen über Bedeutungslehre. Sommersemester 1908, “Husserliana” XXVI, hrsg. von U. Panzer, Dordrecht 1986.
• Ingarden R., O dziele literackim, Warszawa 1960.
• Ingarden R., O pytaniach esencjalnych, [w:] tegoż, Z teorii języka i filozoficznych podstaw logiki, Warszawa 1972.
• Ingarden R., Studia z estetyki, t. 1, Warszawa 1956.
• Ingarden R., Z badań nad filozofią współczesną, Warszawa 1963.
• Krokos J., Odsłanianie intencjonalności, Warszawa 2013, s. 19.
• Lem S., Filozofia przypadku. Literatura w świetle empirii, Kraków 1968.
• Meinong A., „Über Gegenstandstheorie”, in Gesamtausgabe, Bd. II, Graz 1971, s. 481–535.
• Münch D., Intention und Zeichen. Untersuchungen zu Franz Brentano und zu Edmund Husserls Frühwerk, Frankfurt am Main 1993.
• Ong W.J., Oralność i piśmienność. Słowo poddane technologii, tłum i wstęp J. Japola, Lublin 1992.
• Platon, Ion, 534 B-C, [w:] tegoż, Dialogi, t. 1, tłum. W. Witwicki, Kęty 1999.
• Platon, Państwo, 597-598, [w:] tegoż, Państwo, Prawa, tłum. W. Witwicki, Kęty 1999.
• Sachs-Hombach K., Philosophische Psychologie im 19. Jahrhundert. Ihre Ent – stehung und Problemgeschichte, Freiburg-München 1993.
• Szczepańska A., Estetyka Romana Ingardena, Warszawa 1989.
• Topika antyczna w literaturze polskiej XX wieku, red. A. Brodzka, E. Sarnowska-Temeriusz, Wrocław 1992.
• Wawrzyniak A., Egzystencja, [w:] Powszechna encyklopedia filozofii, red. A. Maryniarczyk, t. 3, Lublin 2002, s. 33–34.
• Wysłouch S., Literatura i semiotyka, Warszawa 2001.
• Ziomek J., Retoryka opisowa, Wrocław 1990.

Identifiers

DOI

10.14746/pt.2017.28.2