Dyscyplina naukowa i tożsamość naukowca

• Authors: Zbyszko Melosik
• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

PL

The article is devoted to analysis of the relationships between the identity of scholar and her/hisresearch discipline. The historical, cognitive and social contexts of disciplines is considered againstthe background of the university scholar identification. Besides the following issues are dicussed inthe article: institutionalization of the discipline, the role of epistemic communities, changing bordersof discipline, multidisciplinary approach to research, language of disciplines, status of disciplines andthe meaning of academic freedom.

EN

.

Keywords

PL

discipline; research; identity; scholar; multidisciplinarity

• Publisher: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
• Journal: Studia Edukacyjne
• Year: 2019
• Issue: 54
• Pages: 7-26

Dates

published

2019-09-15

Contributors

author

Zbyszko Melosik

References

• Adjepong A., Historical Imperialism in Science: A Theory of the Relationship between History and Other Disciplines, International Journal of History and Cultural Studies, 2018, 4, 1.
• Barković D., Challenges of Interdisciplinary Research, Interdisciplinary Menagemen Research, 2010, 6.
• Bechtel W., The Nature of Scientific Integration, [w:] Integrating Scientific Disciplines: Case Studies from the Life Sciences, red. W. Bechtel, Dodrecht 1986.
• Berlin I., The Concept of Scientific History, [w:] Concepts and Categories, Oxford 1980.
• Bourdieu P., Homo Academicus, Stanford 1988.
• Bourdieu P., Langugage and Symbolic Power, Cambridge 1991.
• Burris V., The Academic Caste System: Prestige Hierarchies in PhD Exchange Networks, American Sociological Review, April 2004, 69, 2.
• Chettiparamb A., Interdisciplinarity: a literature review, Southampton 2007.
• Christie F., Maton K., Why disciplinaroty, [w:] Disciplinarity: Functional Linguistic and Sociological Perspectives, red. F. Christie, K. Maton, London 2011.
• Clarke M., Hyde A., Drennan J., Professional Identity in Higher Education, [w:] The Academic Profession in Europe: New Tasks and New Challenges, red. B.M. Kehm, U. Teichler, Dordrecht 2013.
• Cohen E.B., Lloyd S.J., Disciplinary Evolution and the Rise of the Transdiscipline, Informing Science: the International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 2014, 17.
• Collins R., Credential Inflation and the Future of Universities, Italian Journal of Sociology of Education, 2011, 2.
• Costley T., Flowerdew J., Introduction, [w:] Discipline-Specific Writing: Theory into practice, red. J. Flowerdew, T. Costley, London 2017.
• Cross M.K. Davis, Re-thinking Epistemic Communities Twenty Years Later, Review of International Studies January 2013, 39/ 01, wersja online: http://www.iheal.univ-paris3.fr/sites/www.iheal.univ-paris3.fr/files/Rethinking_Epistemic_Communities_Twenty.pdf
• Evans E.D., Gomez Ch.J. and McFarland D.A., Measuring Paradigmaticness of Disciplines Using Text, „Sociological Science”, nr 3, 2016.
• Ewaluacja jakości działalności naukowej. Przewodnik, marzec 2019, s. 10; tekst dostępny online: https://konstytucjadlanauki.gov.pl/content/uploads/2019/03/ewaluacja-jakoscidzialalnosci-naukowej-przewodnik20190305.pdf.
• Falk R., Falk R., Why Should Scientists Become Historians, [w:] Positioning the History of Science, red. K. Gavroglu, J. Renn, Dodrecht 2007.
• Fanelli D., Glänzel W., Bibliometric Evidence for a Hierarchy of the Sciences, PloS One, 2013 (8)6; adres internetowy: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3694152/
• Fourcade M., Ollion E., Algan Y., The Superiority of Economists, Maxpo discussion paper,14/3, Paris 2014, s. III, adres internetowy: http://www.maxpo.eu/pub/maxpo_dp/maxpodp14-3.pdf.
• Fuller S., The Knowledge Book: Key Concepts in Philosophy, Science and Culture, Abingdon 2007.
• Gable G.G., The Information Systems Discipline in Australian Universities: a contextual framework, [w:] The Information Systems Academic Discipline in Australia, red. G.G. Gable, S. Gregor, R. Clarke, G. Ridley, R. Smyth, Canberra 2008.
• Geiger R.L., To Advance Knowledge: The Growth of American Research Universities, 1900-1940, New Brunswick 2004.
• Gibbons M., Limoges C., Nowotny H., Schwartzman S., Scott P., Trow M., The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, Stockholm 2005.
• Gläser J., ‘Producing Communities’ as a Theoretical Challenge, TASA 2001 Conference, The University of Sydney, 13-15 December 2001, adres internetowy: http://writingourbiology105.qwriting.qc.cuny.edu/files/2014/08/Science-Community-Reading.pdf.
• Greeno J., Theoretical and Practical Advances Through Research and Learning, [w:] Handbook of Complementary Methods in Education Research, red. J.L. Green, G. Camilli, P.B. Elmore, Washington 2006.
• Guntau M., Laitko H., On the Prigins and Nature of Scientific Disciplines, [w:] World Views and Scientific Discipline Formation, red. W.R. Woodward, R.S. Cohen, Dodrecht 1991.
• Haas P.M., Epistemic Communities, Constructivism and International Environmental Politics, London 2016.
• Hammarfelt B., What is a discipline?: The conceptualization of research areas and their operationalization in bibliometric research, [w:] Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, red. R.C.T. Franssen Alfredo Yegros-Yegros,
• Leiden 2018, s. 198, adres internetowy: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1248151/FULLTEXT01.pdf.
• Hyland K., Disciplinary Differences: Langugage Variations in Academic Discourses, [w:] Academic Discourse Across Disciplines, red. K. Hyland, M. Bondi, Bern 2006.
• Jacobs J.A., In Defense of Disciplines: Interdyscyplinarity and Specialization in the Research University, Chicago 2013.
• Klein J.T., Crossing Boundaries: Knowledge, Disciplinarities, and Interdisciplinarities, Charlottesville 1996.
• Knowledges: Historical and Critical Studies in Disciplinarity, red. E. Messer-Davidow, D.R. Shumway, D. Sylvan, Charlottesville 1993.
• Krishnan A., What are Academic Disciplines? Some observations on the Disciplinarity vs. Interdisciplinarity debate, ESRC National Centre for Research Methods NCRM Working Paper Series, Southampton, January 2009, tekst online, http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/783/1/what_are_academic_disciplines.pdf
• Lamont M., How Professors Think. Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment, Cambridge 2009.
• Lenoir T., The Discipline of Nature and the Nature of Disciplines, [w:] Knowledges: Historical and Critical Studies in Disciplinarity, red. E. Messer-Davidow, D.R. Shumway, D. Sylvan, Charlottesville 1993.
• Lenoir T., Instituting Science: The Cultural Production of Scientific Disciplines, Stanford 1997.
• Li C., The Study of Disciplinary Identity – Some Theoretical Underpinnings, HKBU Papers in Applied Language Studies, 2009, 13.
• Mäki U., Scientific Imperialism: Difficulties in Definition, Identification, and Assessment, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science”, 2013, 27, 3, korzystano z wersji online:https://helda.helsinki.fi//bitstream/handle/10138/232395/MakiScImperialismISPS3sept2012.pdf?sequence=1.
• Malinov A., On the Essence of History, Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 2017, 6, 6.
• McCulloch A., The disciplinary status of doctoral education, Higher Education Review, 2018, 50, 2.
• Messer-Davidow E., Shumway D.R., Sylvan D., Introduction: Disciplinary Ways of Knowing, [w:] Knowledges: Historical and Critical Studies in Disciplinarity, red. E. Messer-Davidow, D.R. Shumway, D. Sylvan, Charlottesville 1993.
• Mills D., Difficult Folk?: A Political History of Social Anthropology, New York 2008.
• Mittelstraß J., The Order of Knowledge: From Disciplinarity to Transdisciplinarity and Back, European Review, 2018, 26, 2.
• Moini R., Zahra Islamizadeh, Do We Need Discipline-Specific Academic Word Lists? Linguistics Academic Word List (LAWL), Journal of Teaching Language Skills (JTLS), 2016, 35, 3.
• Neumann R., The Structure of Knowledge, [w:] The Routledge International Handbook of Higher Education, red. M. Tight, Ka Ho Mok, J. Huisman, Ch. Morphew, New York 2009.
• Nis M., Mathematics and Mathematics Education Policy, [w:] Mathematics & Mathematics Education: Searching for Common Ground, red. M.N. Fried, T. Dreyfus, Dordrecht 2014.
• Noordegraaf M., Schinkel W., Professional Capital Contested: A Bourdieusian Analysis of Conflicts between Professionals and Managers, Comparative Sociology, 2011, 10.
• Parry S., Disciplines and Doctorates, Dodrecht 2007.
• Parsons T., Platt G.M., The American University, Harvard 1975.
• Phare R., Patterns of Knowledge Communities in the Social Sciences, Library Trends, Fall 1996, 45, 2.
• Post R.C., Debating Disciplinarity, „Critical Inquiry”, vol. 35, Summer 2009.
• Pye G., Interdisciplinary Research and the Early Career Researcher, [w:] Positioning Research: Shifting Paradigms, Interdisciplinarity and Indigeneity, red. M. Kumar, S. Pattanayak, Los Angeles 2018.
• Quigley S.A., Academic Identity: A Modern Perspective, Educate, 2011, 11, 1.
• Renner R.G., Subversion of Creativity and the Dialetics of the Collective, [w:] Collective Creativity. Collaborative Work in the Sciences, Literature and the Arts, red. G. Fischer, F. Vassen, Amsterdam 2011.
• Rhoten D., Pfirman S., Women in interdisciplinary science: Exploring preferences and consequences, Research Policy, 2007, 36.
• Rowland S., Enquiring University. Compliance and Contestation in Higher Education, New York 2006.
• Savage M., Political Sociology. The Blackwell Companion to Sociology, red. J.R Blau, Malden 2004.
• Schwab J., Science, Curriculum, and Liberal Education: Selected Essays, red. I. Westbury, N.J. Wilkof, Chicago 1987.
• Scott J.W., Academic Freedom: The Tension Between the University and the State, [w:] Academic Freedom: The Global Challenge, red. M.I.S. Roch, Budapeszt 2018.
• Shiro M.M., Curriculum Theory: Conflicting Visions and Enduring Concerns, London 2008; korzystano z wersji internetowej; adres https://us.corwin.com/sites/default/files/upm-binaries/16446_SchiroWebExtensionActivities.pdf
• Smart J.C., Feldman K.A., Ethington C.A., Academic Disciplines: Holland’s Theory and the Study of College Students and Faculty, Nasville 2000.
• Stichweh R., History of Scientific Disciplines, [w:] International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, red. N. Smelser, P. Baltes, J.D. Wright, Amsterdam 2001.
• Stichweh R., The Sociology of Scientific Disciplines: On the Genesis and Stability of the Disciplinary Structure of Modern Science, Science in Context, March 1992, 5, 01.
• Strand T., The discipline of education in a world of change, Nordisk Pedagogik, 2007, 27.
• Strauss D.F.M., Philosophy: Discipline of the Disciplines, Grand Rapids 2009.
• Sugimoto C.R., Weingart S., The Kaleidoscope of Disciplinarity, Journal of Documentation, July 2015, korzystano z wersji online, bez stron, adres internetowy: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281161918_The_kaleidoscope_of_disciplinarity.
• Szostak R., Gnoli C., López-Huertas M., Interdisciplinary Knowledge Organization, Switzerland 2016.
• Tan M., Lim K.Y.T., On the Nature of Disciplinary Intuitions, [w:] Disciplinary Intuitions and the Design of Learning Environments, red. K.Y.T. Lim, Singapore 2015.
• Tymoczko T., Structuralism and Post-modernism in the Philosophy of Mathematics, [w:] Mathematics, Education and Philosophy: An International Perspective, red. P. Ernest, London 1994.
• Waibel M., Interpretive Communities in International Law, Legal Studies Research. Paper Series, University of Cambridge Faculty of Law, Cambridge, Paper no. 62/2014, October 2014, adres internetowy: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299874831_Interpretive_Communities_in_International_Law.
• Westbury I., Wilkof N.J., Introduction do książki: J. Schwab, Science, Curriculum, and Liberal Education: Selected Essays, red. I. Westbury, N.J. Wilkof, Chicago 1987.
• Willits F.K., Brennan M.A., Changing Perceptions of the University as a Community of Learning: The Case of Penn State, International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Educations, 2016, 28, 1.
• Woolgar S.W., The Identification and Definitions of Scientific Collectivities, [w:] Perspectives on the Emergence of Scientific Disciplines, red. G. Lemaine, R. Macleod, M. Mulkay, P. Weingart, Hague 1976.

Identifiers

DOI

10.14746/se.2019.54.1