Re-telling a story in a second language: How well do adult learners mine an input text for multiword expressions?

• Authors: Hien Hoang , Frank Boers
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Adult second language (L2) learners have often been found to produce discourse that manifests limited and non-native-like use of multiword expressions. One explanation for this is that adult L2 learners are relatively unsuccessful (in the absence of pedagogic intervention) at transferring multiword expressions from input texts to their own output resources. The present article reports an exploratory study where ESL learners were asked to re-tell a short story which they had read and listened to twice. The learners’ re-tells were subsequently examined for the extent to which they recycled multiword expressions from the original story. To gauge the influence of the input text on these learners’ renderings of the story, a control group was asked to tell the story based exclusively on a series of pictures. The results of the experiment suggest that multiword expressions were recycled from the input text to some extent, but this stayed very marginal in real terms, especially in comparison with the recycling of single words. Moreover, when learners did borrow expressions from the input text, their reproductions were often non-target-like.

Keywords

EN

vocabulary; phraseology; formulaic sequences; input; story re-telling

• Publisher: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
• Journal: Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching
• Year: 2016
• Volume: 6
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 513-535

Dates

published

2016-09-29

Contributors

author

Hien Hoang

• Quy Nhon University

author

Frank Boers

• Victoria University of Wellington

References

• Alali, F., & Schmitt, N. (2012). Teaching formulaic sequences: The same or different from teaching single words? TESOL Journal, 3, 153-180. doi: 10.1002/tesj.13
• Altenberg, B., & Granger, S. (2001). The grammatical and lexical patterning of MAKE in native and non-native student writing. Applied Linguistics, 22, 173-194. doi: 10.1093/applin/22.2.173
• Barfield, A., & Gyllstad, H. (Eds.). (2009). Researching collocations in another language: Multiple perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Bestgen, Y., & Granger, S. (2014). Quantifying the development of phraseological competence in L2 English writing: An automated approach. Journal of Second Language Writing, 26, 28-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.004
• Bishop, H. (2004). The effect of typographic salience on the lookup and comprehension of unknown formulaic sequences. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), Formulaic sequences: Acquisition, processing and use (pp. 227-248). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Boers, F., Dang, T., & Strong, B. (2016). Comparing the effectiveness of phrase-focused exercises. A partial replication of Boers, Demecheleer, Coxhead, and Webb (2014). Language Teaching Research. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/1362168816651464
• Boers, F., Demecheleer, M., Coxhead, A., & Webb, S. (2014). Gauging the effects of exercise on verb-noun collocations. Language Teaching Research, 18, 54-74. doi: 10.1177/1362168813505389
• Boers, F., Demecheleer, M., He, L., Deconinck, J., Stengers, H., & Eyckmans, J. (2016). Typographic enhancement of multiword units in second language text. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1111/ijal.12141
• Boers, F., Eyckmans, J., & Stengers, H. (2007). Presenting figurative idioms with a touch of etymology: More than mere mnemonics? Language Teaching Research, 11, 43-62. doi: 10.1177/1362168806072463
• Boers, F., Eyckmans, J., Kappel, J., Stengers, H., & Demecheleer, M. (2006). Formulaic sequences and perceived oral proficiency: Putting a lexical approach to the test. Language Teaching Research, 10, 245-261. doi: 10.1191/1362168 806lr195oa
• Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S. (2009). Optimizing a lexical approach to instructed second language acquisition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S. (2012). Experimental and intervention studies on formulaic sequences in a second language. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 83-110. doi: 10.1017/S0267190512000050
• Boston, J. S. (2008). Learner mining of pre-task and task input. ELT Journal, 62, 66-76. doi: 10.1093/elt/ccm079
• Boston, J. S. (2010). Pre-task syntactic priming and focused task design. ELT Journal, 64, 165-174. doi: 10.1093/elt/ccp033
• Bygate, M. (2001). Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of language. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogical tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and assessment (pp. 23-48). London: Longman.
• Crossley, A. S., Salsbury, T., & McNamara, D. S. (2015). Assessing lexical proficiency using analytic ratings: A case for collocation accuracy. Applied Linguistics, 36, 570-590. doi: 10.1093/applin/amt056
• Dai, Z., & Ding, Y. (2010). Effectiveness of text memorization in EFL learning of Chinese students. In D. Wood (Ed.) Perspectives on formulaic language: Acquisition and communication (pp. 71-87). New York: Continuum.
• Dagut, M., & Laufer, B. (1985). Avoidance of phrasal verbs-A case for contrastive analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7, 73-79. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100005167
• Davis, P., & Kryszewska, H. (2012). The company words keep: Lexical chunks in language teaching. Peaslake: Delta.
• Ellis, N. C. (1996). Sequencing in SLA: Phonological memory, chunking and points of order. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 91-126. doi: 10.1017/ S0272263100014698
• Erman, B., & Warren, B. (2000). The idiom principle and the open choice principle. Text, 20, 29-62. doi: 10.1515/text.1.2000.20.1.29
• Eyckmans, J., Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S. (2016). The impact of imposing processing strategies on L2 learners’ deliberate study of lexical phrases. System, 56, 127-139. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2015.12.001
• Hawkes, M. L. (2012). Using task repetition to direct learner attention and focus on form. ELT Journal, 66, 327-336. doi: 10.1093/elt/ccr059
• Howarth, P. (1998). Phraseology and second language proficiency. Applied Linguistics, 19, 24-44. doi: 10.1093/applin/19.1.24
• Jones, M., & Haywood, S. (2004). Facilitating the acquisition of formulaic sequences: An exploratory study. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), Formulaic sequences (pp. 269-300). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Laufer, B. (1995). Beyond 2000: A measure of productive lexicon in a second language. In L. Eubank, M. Sharwood-Smith, & L. Selinker (Eds.), The current state of interlanguage (pp. 265-272). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Laufer, B. (2000). Avoidance of idioms in a second language: The effect of L1-L2 degree of similarity. Studia Linguistica, 54, 186-196. doi: 10.1111/1467-9582. 00059
• Laufer, B. (2011). The contribution of dictionary use to the production and retention of collocations in a second language. International Journal of Lexicography, 24, 29-49. doi: 10.1093/ijl/ecq039
• Laufer, B., & Girsai, N. (2008). Form-focused instruction in second language vocabulary learning: A case for contrastive analysis and translation. Applied Linguistics, 29, 694-716. doi: 10.1093/applin/amn018
• Laufer, B., & Waldman, T. (2011). Verb-noun collocations in second language writing: A corpus analysis of learners’ English. Language Learning, 61, 647-672. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00621.x
• Li, J., & Schmitt, N. (2010). The development of collocation use in academic texts by advanced L2 learners: A multiple case study approach. In D. Wood (Ed.), Perspectives on formulaic language: Acquisition and communication (pp. 22-46). New York: Continuum.
• Lin, P. (2012). Sound evidence: The missing piece of the jigsaw in formulaic language research. Applied Linguistics, 33, 342-347. doi: 10.1093/applin/ams017
• Lindstromberg, S., Eyckmans, J., & Connabeer, R. (2016). A modified dictogloss for helping learners remember L2 academic English formulaic sequences for use in later writing. English for specific purposes, 41, 12-21. doi: 10.1016/j.esp.2015.08.002
• Levitzky-Aviad, T., & Laufer, B. (2013). Lexical properties in the writing of foreign language learners over eight years of study: Single words and collocations. In C. Bardel, C. Lindqvist, & B. Laufer (Eds.), L2 vocabulary acquisition, knowledge and use. New perspectives on assessment and corpus analysis (pp. 127-148). EUROSLA.
• Lewis, M. (1997). Implementing the lexical approach. Hove: Language Teaching.
• Lewis, M. (Ed.). (2000). Teaching collocation. Hove: Language Teaching.
• Lindstromberg, S., & Boers, F. (2008). Teaching chunks of language: From noticing to remembering. Rum: Helbling Languages.
• McCarthy, M., & O’Dell, F. (2005). English collocations in use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Meunier, F. (2012). Formulaic language and language teaching. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 111-129. doi: 10.1017/S0267190512000128
• Meunier, F., & Granger, S. (2008). Phraseology in foreign language learning and teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Nattinger, J. R., & DeCarrico, J. S. (1992). Lexical phrases and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Nesselhauf, N. (2003). The use of collocations by advanced learners of English and some implications for teaching. Applied Linguistics, 24, 223-242. doi: 10.1093/applin/24.2.223
• Pawley, A., & Syder, F. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In J. Richards & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 191-226). London: Longman.
• Pellicer-Sánchez, A. (2015). Learning L2 collocations incidentally from reading. Language Teaching Research. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/1362168815618428
• Peters, E. (2009). Learning collocations through attention-drawing techniques: A qualitative and quantitative analysis. In A. Barfield & H. Gyllstad (Eds.), Researching collocations in another language: Multiple perspectives (pp. 194-207). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Peters, E. (2012). Learning German formulaic sequences: The effect of two attention-drawing techniques. Language Learning Journal, 40, 65-79. doi: 10.1080/09571736.2012.658224
• Peters, E. (2016). The learning burden of collocations: The role of interlexical and intralexical factors. Language Teaching Research, 20, 113-138. doi: 10.1177/1362168814568131
• Peters, E., & Pauwels, P. (2015). Learning academic formulaic sequences. Journal of English for academic purposes, 20, 28-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jeap.2015.04.002
• Polio, C. (Ed.). (2012). Topics in formulaic language (Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32).
• Samuda, V. (2001). Guiding relationships between form and meaning during task performance: the role of the teacher. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogical tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and assessment (pp. 119-140). London: Longman.
• Schmidt, R. W. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3-32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Schmitt, N. (Ed.). (2004). Formulaic sequences. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Schmitt, N., & Schmitt, D. (2014). A reassessment of frequency and vocabulary size in L2 vocabulary teaching. Language Teaching, 47, 484-503. doi: 10.1017/S0261444812000018
• Serrano, R., Stengers, H., & Housen, A. (2015). Acquisition of formulaic sequences in intensive and regular EFL programmes. Language Teaching Research, 19, 89-106. doi: 10.1177/1362168814541748
• Sharwood-Smith, M. (1993). Input enhancement and instructed SLA: Theoretical bases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 165-179. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100011943
• Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, concordance and collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Siyanova, A., & Schmitt, N. (2007). Native and nonnative use of multi-word vs. one-word verbs. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45, 109-139. doi: 10.1515/IRAL.2007.005
• Siyanova, A., & Schmitt, N. (2008). L2 learner production and processing of collocation: A multi-study perspective. Canadian Modern Language Review, 64, 429-458. doi: 10.1353/cml.2008.0042
• Siyanova-Chanturia, A., & Martinez R. (2015). The idiom principle revisited. Applied Linguistics, 36, 549-569. doi: 10.1093/applin/amt054
• Skrzypek, A., & Singleton, D. (2013). Productive knowledge of English collocations in adult Polish learners: The role of short-term memory. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10, 105-129.
• Sonbul, S. (2015). Fatal mistake, awful mistake or extreme mistake? Frequency effects on off-line/on-line collocational processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18, 419-437. doi: 10.1017/S1366728914000674
• Sonbul, S., & Schmitt, N. (2013). Explicit and implicit lexical knowledge: Acquisition of collocations under different input conditions. Language Learning, 63, 121-159. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00730.x
• Stengers, H., Boers, F., Housen, A., & Eyckmans. J. (2010). Does chunking foster chunk uptake? In S. De Knop, F. Boers, & A. De Rycker (Eds.), Fostering language teaching efficiency through cognitive linguistics (99-117). Mouton de Gruyter.
• Stengers, H., Boers, F., Housen, A., & Eyckmans, J. (2011). Formulaic sequences and L2 oral proficiency: Does the type of target language influence the association? International Review of Applied Linguistics, 49, 321-343. doi: 10.1515/iral.2011.017
• Szudarski, P., & Carter, R. (2014). The role of input flood and input enhancement in EFL learners’ acquisition of collocations. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1111/ijal.12092
• Szudarski, P., & Conklin, K. (2014). Short- and long-term effects of rote rehearsal on ESL learners’ processing of L2 collocations. TESOL Quarterly, 48, 833-842. doi: 10.1002/tesq.201
• VanPatten, B. (2002). Processing instruction: An update. Language Learning, 52, 755-803. doi: 10.1111/1467-9922.00203
• Wang, Z. (2014). On-line time pressure manipulations: L2 speaking performance under five types of planning and repetition conditions. In P. Skehan (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp. 27-62). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Webb, S. A., & Chang, A, C-S. (2012). Vocabulary learning through assisted and unassisted repeated reading. Canadian Modern Language Review, 68, 267-290. doi: 10.1353/cml.2012.0020
• Webb, S. A., & Kagimoto, E. (2011). Learning collocations: Do the number of collocates, position of the node word, and synonymy affect learning? Applied Linguistics, 32, 259-276. doi: 10.1093/applin/amq051.
• Webb, S., Newton, J., & Chang, A. C. S. (2013). Incidental learning of collocation. Language Learning, 63, 91-120. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00729.x
• Wolter, B., & Gyllstad, H. (2011) Collocational links in the L2 mental lexicon and the influence of L1 intralexical knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 32, 430-449. doi: 10.1093/applin/amr011
• Wood, D. (2009). Effects of focused instruction of formulaic sequences on fluent expression in second language narratives: A case study. The Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12, 39-57.
• Wood, D. (Ed.) (2010a). Perspectives on formulaic language: Acquisition and communication. New York: Continuum.
• Wood, D. (2010b). Formulaic language and second language speech fluency: Background, evidence and classroom applications. New York: Continuum.
• Wood, D. (2015). Fundamentals of formulaic language: An introduction. London: Bloomsbury.
• Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Yamashita, J., & Jiang, N. (2010). L1 influence on the acquisition of L2 collocations: Japanese ESL users and EFL learners acquiring English collocations. TESOL Quarterly, 44, 647-668. doi: 10.5054/tq.2010.235998.

Identifiers

DOI

10.14746/ssllt.2016.6.3.7