La subjetivización y las dinámicas interaccionales

• Authors: Marek Baran

Title variants

EN

Subjectification and interactional dynamics

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

PL

In the present article the subjectification process is being discussed in relation to the concept of interactional dynamics. It is suggested that to encode various semantic-pragmatic profiles can lead to changes at the level of communicative behavior patterns, which, for their part, are dominated by a particular order of socio-cultural conventionalization. The scope of conversational markers or nominal forms of address (NFA), which are submitted to analysis in the present study, indicates that the routinizing language use, together with an explicit grammatical manifestation, covers areas that appear to be semantically and pragmatically important in a given speaking community.

EN

The following paper describes the microgenetic analysis of the translation process of 'Le Petit Chaperon Rouge' carried out by six students during the Translation Seminar of Scientific and Literary Texts and its Didactics, instructed at the Institute of Research in Education of the University of Veracruz. This article’s purpose is to demonstrate the process which was carried out during the microgenetic analysis, as well as to give an initial report of its results and the advantages that this kind of analysis could represent for the translation teaching-learning process. Furthermore, we describe the computer program called El Espía, which enabled us to explore thoroughly and automatically the students’ translation process, in order to identify learning scenarios and carried out a microgenetic analysis.

Keywords

PL

subjectification; pragmaticalization; interactional linguistics; conversational markers; ethnolects; Spanish language; face-work

EN

subjectification; pragmaticalization; interactional linguistics; conversational markers; ethnolects; Spanish language; face-work; subjectification; pragmaticalization; interactional linguistics; conversational markers; ethnolects; Spanish language; face-work

• Publisher: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
• Journal: Studia Romanica Posnaniensia
• Year: 2014
• Volume: 41
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 3-16

Dates

published

2014-01-01

Contributors

author

Marek Baran

• Universidad de Łódź

References

• Downing Rothwell, Angela (1978): «La subjetivización del adverbio en el inglés de hoy». Cuadernos de investigación filológica, 4: 17-28.
• ---
• Finegan, Edward (1995): «Subjectivity and subjectivisation: an introduction». In: Dieter stein, Susan Wright [eds.], Subjectivity and subjectivisation. Linguistic Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554469.001
• ---
• González Manzano, Mónica (2010): «Subjetivización y unidireccionalidad en la evolución histórica del adverbio verdaderamente». Res Diachronicae, 8: 7-27.
• ---
• González Ollé, Fernando (2002): «Vamos: un conector coloquial de gran complejidad». In: María Antonia Zorraquino, Estrella Montolío Durán [coords.], Los marcadores del discurso. Teoríay análisis. Madrid: Arco/Libros, 117-135.
• ---
• González Sanz, Marina (2011): «Proceso de gramaticalización y subjetivización de toma». Res Diachronicae, 9: 51-65.
• ---
• Kerbrat-Orecc hioni, Catherine (1996): La conversation. Paris: Seuil.
• ---
• Lakoff, Robin (1973): «The logic of politeness or minding your p's and q's». In: C. Colum et al. [eds.], Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 292-305.
• ---
• Lakoff, Robin (1975): Language and Woman's Place. New York: Harper and Row.
• ---
• Langack er, Ronald W. (1987): Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume 1, Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
• ---
• Langack er, Ronald W. (1990): «Subjectification». Cognitive Linguistics, 1: 5-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1990.1.1.5
• ---
• Langack er, Ronald W. (1991): Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume 2, Descriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
• ---
• Langack er, Ronald W. (2000): Grammar and Conceptualization (Cognitive linguistics research). Berlin – New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
• ---
• Leech, Geoffrey N. (1983): Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
• ---
• Mulo Farenkia, Bernard (2008) : « Du vocatif au relationnel : Typologie des fonctions pragmatiques des formes de l'adresse au Cameroun ». In: Bernard Mulo Farenkia [ed.], De la politesse linguistique au Cameroun. Frankfurt am Main – Berlin – Bern – Bruxelles – New York – Oxford, Wien: Peter Lang, 85-107.
• ---
• Nuyts, Jan J . (2001): «Subjectivity as an evidential dimension in epistemic modal expressions». Journal of Pragmatics, 33: 383-400. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216600000096
• ---
• Pop, Liana (2006) : « Peut-on parler de style interjectif ? Le cas du roumain ». Langages, 161: 24-36. Real Academia Espa-ola, Banco De Datos (CREA): Corpus de referencia del espa-ol actual. [en línea] http://www.rae.es. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/lang.161.0024
• ---
• Reynoso Noverón, Jeanett (2005): «Procesos de gramaticalización por subjetivización: el uso del diminutivo en espa-ol». In: David Eddington [ed.], Selected Proceedings of the 7th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project, 79-86.
• ---
• Ridruejo, Emilio (2002): «Cambio pragmático y cambio gramatical». Language Design, 4: 95-111.
• ---
• Romero Aguilera, Laura (2006): «La gramaticalización de verbos de movimiento como marcadores del discurso: el caso de vamos». Res Diachronicae, 5: 46-56.
• ---
• Tannen, Deborah (1989): Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• ---
• Traugott, Elizabeth Closs (1989): «On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change». Language, 65: 31-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/414841
• ---
• Traugott, Elizabeth Closs (1995): «Subjectification in grammaticalisation». In: Dieter Stein, Susan Wright [eds.], Subjectivity and Subjectivisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 37-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554469.003
• ---
• Traugott, Elizabeth Closs; Dasher, Richard B. (2001): Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486500

Identifiers

DOI

10.14746/strop.2014.411.001