L’attitude, puis les arguments

• Authors: Ewa Pirogowska

Title variants

EN

Attitude first, arguments thereafter

• Languages of publication: FR

Abstracts

FR

The paper investigates the challenges posed by argumentation relying on a logical fallacy. The data has been obtained from a genuine interaction found in cyberspace. The aim of the study is to demonstrate that once a line of reasoning is arbitrarily imposed, a conversational schema emerges, even in spite of the fact that the messages are not consistently interlinked.

EN

The paper investigates the challenges posed by argumentation relying on a logical fallacy. The data has been obtained from a genuine interaction found in cyberspace. The aim of the study is to demonstrate that once a line of reasoning is arbitrarily imposed, a conversational schema emerges, even in spite of the fact that the messages are not consistently interlinked.

Keywords

FR

cyberspace; logical fallacy; argumentative subversiveness; false causation; cyberspace; logical fallacy; argumentative subversiveness; false causation

EN

cyberspace; logical fallacy; argumentative subversiveness; false causation

• Publisher: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
• Journal: Studia Romanica Posnaniensia
• Year: 2017
• Volume: 44
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 137-149

Dates

published

2017-09-15

Contributors

author

Ewa Pirogowska

• Université Adam Mickiewicz

References

• Adam, J.-M. (2008). Énonciation et narration. Fragments de rhétorique chiraquienne. In E. Danblon et al. (éds), Argumentation et narration. Édition de l’Université de Bruxelles.
• Burger, M., Lugrin, G., Micheli, R., Pahud, S. (2006). Marques linguistiques et manipulation. Mots. Les langages du politique, 81, pp. 9-22.
• Greenwald, A. G. (1968). Cognitive learning, cognitive response to persuasion and attitude change. In A. G. Greenwald, T. C. Brock, T. M. Ostrom (éds), Psychological foundations of attitudes (pp. 147-170). New York : Academic Press. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4832-3071-9.50012-X
• Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. (2005). Le discours en interaction. Paris : Armand Colin.
• Plantin, Ch. (1990). Essais sur l’argumentation. Paris : Kimé.
• Plantin, Ch. (1995). L’argument du paralogisme. Hermès, 15 (Argumentation et Rhétorique I), p. 251.
• Retrieved from http://documents.irevues.inist.fr/bitstream/handle/2042/15170/HERMES_1995_15_245.pdf?sequence=1
• Robrieux, J.-J. (2005). Rhétorique et argumentation. Paris : Armand Colin.
• Searle, J. R. (1972). Les actes de langage. Essai de philosophie linguistique. Paris : Hermann.
• Vignaux, G. (1988). Enonciation, argumentation et cognition. Paris : Ophrys.

Identifiers

DOI

10.14746/strop.2017.443.009