Using Space Syntax For Estimation Of Potential Disaster Indirect Economic Losses

• Authors: Georgi Penchev

Title variants

Wykorzystania syntaksu przestrzeni do szacowania pośrednich strat ekonomicznych wynikających z katastrof ekologicznych

• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The paper is aimed at estimation of indirect economic losses resulting from natural disasters. Generally, these losses are defined as interruptions in economic activities and are not related to the damaged enterprises. Even limited physical damage to property and infrastructure caused by natural disaster can produce chain reaction of losses in supply chain within a certain region. The Space Syntax Methodology is developed and used for accessing the characteristics of buildings, cities or the surrounding space in general. Although the methodology was primarily developed as urban planning method, it was also applied in the field of social and economic networks. Various studies of poverty, crime, disaster management and real estate prices are based on this methodology. The economic activities within a specific area are in a state of equilibrium before a disastrous event occurs. The disaster will change the spatial configuration (streets, buildings and infrastructure) causing negative effect on the economic networks and business opportunities. The main assumption of the research is that potential indirect losses could be estimated by comparing the Space Syntax characteristics before and after a disastrous event by measuring the deterioration of links between economic enterprises. The methodology is applied in a practical study of urban area. OpenStreetMap data is used as road-centred map of the city of York. The Historical Flood Map of the UK Environment Agency is used to setup disaster event impact. The Angular Segment Analysis implemented in DepthmapX software is used as the main method for analysis. The study of applicable network measures shows that Normalised Angular Choice can be used as criteria for selecting alternatives for minimizing indirect costs caused by road network damages. At the same time, this methodology cannot be used for monetizing indirect costs or identifying losses in different economic sectors. The study approach does not contradict the main theoretical approaches and it gives new opportunities for research on disasters recovery.

PL

Referat ma na celu oszacowanie pośrednich strat ekonomicznych wynikających z klęsk żywiołowych. Generalnie, straty te są definiowane jako przerwa w działalności gospodarczej. Nawet ograniczone fizyczne uszkodzenie mienia i infrastruktury spowodowane przez klęski żywiołowe mogą powodować reakcję łańcuchową strat w łańcuchu dostaw w określonym regionie. Metoda syntaksu przestrzeni jest rozwijana i wykorzystywana do uzyskania charakterystyki budynków, miast lub otaczającej przestrzeni. Chociaż metoda została opracowana przede wszystkim jako metoda planowania miejskiego, była również stosowana w dziedzinie sieci społecznych i gospodarczych.

Keywords

EN

space syntax methodology; indirect economics looses

PL

przestrzeń składni mrthodology; ekonomia pośrednie traci; przestrzeń składni mrthodology; ekonomia pośrednie traci

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
• Journal: Comparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe
• Year: 2016
• Volume: 19
• Issue: 5
• Pages: 125-142

Dates

published

2017-03-30

Contributors

author

Georgi Penchev

• University of National and World Economy, Faculty Ëconomics of Infrastructure, Department “National and Regional Security”

References

• Al-Sayed K., Turner A., Hillier B., Iida S., Penn A. (2015), Space syntax methodology textbook, Bartlett School of Architecture, UCL, London.
• Batty M. (2004), A new theory of space syntax, Working Paper 75, Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis, University College London.
• Castillo M.M. (2013), Urban Patterns And Disaster Risk, [in:] Proceedings of the Ninth International Space Syntax Symposium, (ed.) Y. O. Kim, H. T. Park and K. W. Seo, Seoul: Sejong University.
• Clower T.L. (2005), Economic applications in disaster research, mitigation, and planning, ʻDisciplines, Disasters and Emergency Management: The Convergence of Concepts Issues and Trends From the Research Literatureʼ.
• Cutini V., Petri M., Santucci A. (2004), From axial maps to mark point parameter analysis – a GIS implemented method to automate configurational analysis [in:] Computational science and its applications – ICCSA 2004: International conference, Assisi, Italy, may 14–17, part II.
• Dalton N. (2001), Fractional configurational analysis and a solution to the Manhattan problem [in:] Space Syntax 3rd International Symposium, Atlanta.
• Data.gov.uk, Historic Flood Map – Datasets.
• David S., Brookshire J.T., Mark A. Thayer (1985), A test of the expected utility model: Evidence from earthquake risks, ʻJournal of Political Economyʼ, vol. 93, no. 2.
• De Groeve T. et al. (2015), Guidance for recording and sharing disaster damage and loss data towards the development of operational indicators to translate the Sendai Framework into action., Publications Office, Luxembourg.
• Don N., MacDonald H.L.W., James C. Murdoch (1987), Uncertain hazards, insurance, and consumer choice: Evidence from housing markets, ʻLand Economicsʼ, vol. 63, no. 4.
• FEMA (2015), Estimating Potential Losses From Disasters [in:] FEMA Fact Sheet.
• FEMA (2014), HAZUS-MH, User Manual: Multi-hazard Loss Estimation Methodology, Flood Model, FEMA.
• Gil J., Steinbach P. (2008), From flood risk to indirect flood impact: Evaluation of street network performance for effective management, response and repair [in:] WIT Press, WIT Press, vol. I.
• Grubesic T.H., Murray A.T. (2008), Vital nodes, interconnected infrastructures, and the geographies of network survivability, ʻAnnals of the Association of American Geographersʼ, vol. 96, no. 1.
• Hillier B., Hanson J. (1984), The social logic of space, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge University Press.
• Hillier W.R.G., Yang T., Turner A. (2012), Normalising least angle choice in Depthmap-and how it opens up new perspectives on the global and local analysis of city space, ʻJournal of Space syntaxʼ, vol. 3, no. 2.
• Jiang B., Claramunt C. (2004), Topological Analysis of Urban Street Networks, ʻEnvironment and Planning B: Planning and Designʼ, vol. 31, no. 1.
• Koks E.E. et al., (2015), Regional disaster impact analysis: Comparing Input-Output and Computable General Equilibrium models, ʻNatural Hazards and Earth System Sciences Discussionsʼ, vol. 3, no. 11.
• OECD (2012), Disaster Risk Assessment and Risk Financing. A G20 / OECD Methodological Framework, OECD.
• Sakakibara H., Kajitani Y., Okada N. (2004), Road network robustness for avoiding functional isolation in disasters, ʻJournal of Transportation Engineeringʼ, vol. 130, no. 5.
• Schulz C. (2012), The identification of critical road infrastructures – the case of Baden-Württemberg, KIT Scientific Publishing, Karlsruhe.
• Turner A. (2005), Could a road-centre line be an axial line in disguise [in:] Proceedings of the 5rd Space Syntax Symposium, vol. 1.

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/cer-2016-0041