Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2017 | 24 | 1 | 23-40

Article title

Decentralization Reform in Ukraine: Assessment of the Chosen Transformation Model

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
Ukraine has to reform the spatial organization of power, which involves alteration of the administrative-territorial division in very difficult socio-economic and political conditions. Despite a great interest in the Ukrainian decentralization reform in scientific publications and media, the influence of chosen voluntary consolidation mode on the newly formed territorial communities, including their spatial configuration, economic potential and institutional capability, remains uncovered. Trying to shed some light on the issue, the authors made an attempt to reveal advantages and disadvantages of the selected model of reform on the example of the Perspective Plan of Territorial Communities Formation in Kyiv Region.

Year

Volume

24

Issue

1

Pages

23-40

Physical description

Dates

published
2017-10-06

Contributors

  • Academy of Municipal Administration
  • Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
  • Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
  • Non-Governmental Organization ‘Ukrainian Researches Society’

References

  • BAFOIL, F. (2010), Regionalization and decentralization in a comparative perspective. Eastern Europe and Poland, Warszawa: Ministerstwo Rozwoju Regionalnego.
  • BORYSLAVSKA, О., ZAVERUKHA, I. and ZAKHARCHENKO, E. (2012), Decentralization of public power: European experience and prospects for Ukraine, Kyiv: Sofia Ltd. (In Ukrainian).
  • BUCHYNSKA, A. (2010), ‘Legal grounds of local self-government functioning in Poland and Ukraine: a comparative analysis’, Juridical Bulletin. Air and space law, 3, pp. 28–33. (In Ukrainian).
  • DEVEY, K. (2002), ‘Decentralization in CEE Countries: Obstacles and Opportunities’, [in:] PÉTERI, G. (ed), Mastering Decentralization and Public Administration Reforms in Central and Eastern Europe, Budapest: Open Society Institute, pp. 31–42.
  • HANUSHCHAK, Yu. (2013), The reform of the territorial organization of power, Кyiv: Sofia Ltd. (In Ukrainian).
  • GLADKA, T. (2015), ‘Decentralization of power in Ukraine as means of strengthening democracy and increasing its stability’, Public Administration: Improvement and Development, 12. (In Ukrainian).
  • KRAUJUTAITYTE, L., RIEKASIUS, R. and BURBULITE-TSISKARISHVILI, G. (2014), ‘Territorial Decentralization in Lithuania: a Missing Continuum’, Social Research, 1 (34), pp. 53–62.
  • KUCHABSKYI, О. (2010), ‘Political will as a constituent of social mechanism of administrative-territorial division improvement in Ukraine’, Democratic Governance, 5. (In Ukrainian).
  • KULESZA, M. (2002), ‘Methods and Techniques of Managing Decentralization Reforms in the CEE Countries: The Polish Experience’, [in:] PÉTERI, G. (ed.), Mastering Decentralization and Public Administration Reforms in Central and Eastern Europe, Budapest: Open Society Institute, pp. 189–214.
  • LESECHKO, M., CHEMERYS, A. (2001), ‘Administrative reform: the Polish experience and Ukrainian realities’, Actual Problems of Public Administration, 4, pp. 91–105. (In Ukrainian).
  • OTOLA, I. (2008), ‘Decentralization processes of local government sector in Poland’, [in:] The 16th NISPAcee Annual Conference. Public Policy and Administration: Challenges and Synergies, Bratislava, https://ssrn.com/abstract=1785022 (15.05.2008).
  • REGULSKY, J. (2000), Samorząd III Rzeczypospolitej. Koncepcje i realizacja, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  • MISKYI, V. and HALUSHKA, O. (eds.) (2015), Reforms Under the Microscope: 2015, Kyiv: Reanimation Package of Reforms. (In Ukrainian).
  • SERYOGIN, S., GONCHARUK, N. (2015), ‘Theoretical bases and main directions of local government reform and decentralization of power in Ukraine’, Public Administration Aspects, 4, pp. 111‒120. (In Ukrainian).
  • SCHIMANKE, D. (2008), System of local government and its reforming. The experience of some European countries (Denmark, Germany, England, France, and Sweden), Kyiv: GTZ Bureau. (In Ukrainian).
  • SZCZEPÁNSKY, M. (1995), ‘Upper Silesia – Social Preparedness for Restructuring Processes: 18 Sociological Propositions’, [in:] WÓDZ, K. (ed.), Regional Identity – Regional Consciousness. The Upper Silesian Experience, Katowice, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego, pp. 110–123.
  • TARASENKO, T. (2014), ‘Issue of decentralization in context of local self-government reform in Ukraine’, Public Administration and Local Self-Government, 2 (21), pp. 277–286. (In Ukrainian).
  • UKRAINIAN GOVERNMENT, Decree ‘On the Approval of the Methodology for Creation of Capable Territorial Communities’ N 214 as of 8 April 2015, Ofitsiynyi Visnyk Ukrayiny [Official Herald of Ukraine], Issue 33, 5 May 2015.
  • VANAGS, A. (2005), ‘Development of Local Government Reforms in Latvia’, Viešoji politika ir administrativima, 13, pp. 15–24.
  • VERKHOVNA RADA OF UKRAINE, The Law of Ukraine ‘On cooperation of territorial communities’ N 1508-VII as of 17 June 2014, Holos Ukrayiny [The Voice of Ukraine], Issue 138 (6043), 23 June 2014.
  • VERKHOVNA RADA OF UKRAINE, The Law of Ukraine ‘On voluntary consolidation of territorial communities’ N 157-VIII as of 5 February 2015, Holos Ukrayiny [The Voice of Ukraine], Issue 39 (6043), 4 March 2015.
  • YERMOLAYEV, A., YERMOLAYEV, A., LUPATSIY, A., POTAPENKO, V., KLYMENKO, I., ROMANOVA, V., YEMETS, V. and TAR, S. (2015), The decentralization of power and local self-government reform in Ukraine, Kyiv, New Ukraine: Institute for Strategic Studies. (In Ukrainian).

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_1515_esrp-2017-0002
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.