What is the ‘Future’ of Greek? Towards a Pragmatic Analysis

• Authors: Michael Chiou
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The paper investigates the problems related to futurity and modality in modern Greek. The discussion of Greek temporal future expressions is conducted with reference to relevant literature from the areas of English linguistics, cognitive studies and pragmatics. The focus is on the status of future-oriented expressions and the question whether they are primarily epistemic in nature, whether they are tense-based, or modality-based. It is argued that the future tense in Greek has a modal semantic base conveying epistemic modality and that the preferred future prospective reading is a pragmatic development of the semantic modal base. The author further suggests that the future reading is a kind of presumptive meaning which follows from the neo-Gricean Principle of Informativeness, known as the I-principle (Levinson 2000) being a generalised interpretation which does not depend on contextual information.

Keywords

EN

pragmatics; neo-Gricean pragmatics; modality; tense; Greek

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
• Journal: Research in Language
• Year: 2014
• Volume: 12
• Issue: 4
• Pages: 355-375

Dates

published

2014-12-30

Contributors

author

Michael Chiou

• Athens Metropolitan College

References

• Abusch, Dorit. (2004). “On the temporal composition of infinitives”. In J. Guéron, & J. Lecarme (Eds.), The Syntax of Time (1–34). Cambridge, Mass, The MIT Press.
• Bybee, Joan L. & Östen Dahl (1989). “The creation of tense and aspect systems in the languages of the world”. Studies in Language, 13.1, 51-103.
• Bybee, Joan L., Revere D. Perkins & William Pagliuca (1994). The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.
• Comrie, Bernard (1976). Aspect. Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Comrie, Bernard (1985). Tense. Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Condoravdi, Clio. (2002). Temporal interpretation for modals. Modals for the present and modals for the past. In D. Beaver al. (eds.), Stanford Papers on Semantics. Stanford: CSLI, 59-87.
• Copley, Bridget (2009). The Semantics of the Future. Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics. New York: Routledge.
• Dahl, Östen (1985). Tense and Aspect Systems. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Enç, M. (1996). Tense and Modality. In S. Lappin (ed.), Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory. Oxford : Blackwell.
• Giannakidou, Anastasia (2009). “The dependency of the subjunctive revisited: temporal semantics and polarity”. Lingua, 120, 1883-1908. DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2008.11.007
• Giannakidou, Anastasia (2012). “The Greek future particle as an epistemic modal”. In Z. Gavriilidou, A. Efthimiou, E. Thomadaki and P. Kambakis-Vougiouklis (Eds.), Proceedings of 10th ICGL (48-61) Democritus University of Thrace.
• Giannakidou, Anastasia & Alda Mari (2012). “A modal analysis of Greek and Italian future morphemes”. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 17: 255-270.
• Giannakidou, Anastasia & Alda Mari (2013). “A two dimensional analysis of the future: modal adverbs and speaker’s bias”. Proceedings of the Amsterdam Colloquium 2013: 115-122.
• Giannakidou, Anastasia & Alda Mari (2014). The future in Greek and Italian: truth conditional and evaluative dimensions. Ms.
• Grice, Paul (1975). “Logic and Conversation”. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts (41-58). New York: Academic Press.
• Grice, Paul (1989). Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
• Heine, Bernd (1995). Agent-oriented vs. epistemic modality: some observations on English modals. In J. Bybee & S. Fleischman (Eds.), Modality in grammar in discourse: Typological Studies in Language 32 (17-53) Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Holton, David, Mackridge, Peter & Philippaki-Warburton, Irene (1997). Greek: A Comprehensive Grammar of the Modern Language. London, Routledge.
• Jaszczolt, M. Kasia (2006). Futurity in Default Semantics. In: K. von Heusinger and K. Turner (Eds.), Where Semantics Meets Pragmatics. (471-492) Oxford: Elsevier.
• Jaszczolt, M. Kasia (2009). Representing Time: An Essay on Temporality as Modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Jaszczolt, M. Kasia (2011). Time as degrees of epistemic commitment. In: P. Stalmaszczyk (Ed.), Turning Points in the Philosophy of Language and Linguistics. (19-34) Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
• Jaszczolt, M. Kasia (2013). Temporality and epistemic commitment: An unresolved question. In: K. Jaszczolt and L. de Saussure (Eds.), Time: Language, Cognition, and Reality. (193-209) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Joseph D. Brian (1983). The synchrony and diachrony of the Balkan infinitive. A study in aerial, general and historical linguistics. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics Supplementary Volume. Cambridge University Press.
• Kissine, M. (2008). Why will is not a modal. Natural Language Semantics, 16 (2): 129–55. DOI: 10.1007/s11050-008-9028-0
• Levinson C. Stephen (1987). “ Pragmatics and the grammar of Anaphora: A partial pragmatic reduction of binding and control phenomena”. Journal of Linguistics, 23, 379-434. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700011324
• Levinson C. Stephen (1991). “Pragmatic Reduction of Pragmatic Conditions Revisited”. Journal of Linguistics, 27, 107-161. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700012433
• Levinson, S.C. (1995) ‘Three levels of meaning’, in F.R. Palmer (ed.) Grammar and Meaning. Essays in Honour of Sir John Lyons, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Levinson C. Stephen (2000). Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
• Ludlow, Peter (1999). Semantics, Tense and Time: An Essay in the Metaphysics of Natural Language. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
• Mackridge, Peter (1985). The Modern Greek Language: A Descriptive Analysis of Standard Modern Greek. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Mari, Alda. (2009). The future : how to derive the temporal interpretation. JSM 2009, Paris VII.
• Mari, Alda. (2010). Temporal reasoning and modality. Invited talk Temptypac Workshop, Paris VIII.
• Philippaki-Warburton, Irene (1992). “Η συντακτική ταυτότητα του να”. (255-274). Studies in Greek Linguistics.
• Philippaki-Warburton, Irene (1994). Verb movement and clitics in Modern Greek. In Philippaki-Warburton I., Nicolaidis, K. & Sifianou, M. (eds.), Themes in Greek CLITICS AND DOUBLING (53-60), Current issues in linguistic theory 117. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Rivero, Maria-Luisa (1994). Clause structure and v-movementin the languagesof the balkans. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 12: 63–120. DOI: 10.1007/BF00992746
• Sarkar, Anoop (1998) "The Conflict Between Future Tense and Modality: The Case of Will in English," University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics: Vol. 5: Iss. 2, Article 6.
• Smith, Carlota (1991). The parameter of aspect. Studies on Linguistics and Philosophy 43. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Squartini, Mario (2004). “Disentangling evidentiality and epistemic modality in Romance”. Lingua, 114: 873-895. DOI: 10.1016/S0024-3841(03)00064-0
• Tsangalidis, Anastasios (1999). Will and Tha: a comparative study of the category of the future. Thessaloniki: University Studio Press.
• Veloudis, Jiannis & Philippaki-Warburton, Irene, 1983. The subjunctive in Modern Greek. In Studies in Greek Linguistics. Proceedings of the 4th annual meeting of the Department of Linguistics (151-168). University of Thessaloniki.
• Xidopoulos, Georgios (1996). Tense, aspect and adverbials in Modern Greek. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. University College London.

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/rela-2015-0004