The Discourse of Daily Life during the War: the 2022 Ukrainian Projection

• Authors: Larysa Klymanska , Maryna Klimanska , Inna Haletska

Abstracts

EN

Aim. To define and describe the positions of Ukrainians in their attitude to the war on Russia and reflection of this attitude in the discourse of daily life in wartime. Concept/Methods. 25 transcripts of semi-structured interviews subjected to thematic analysis. Relying on the categories identified through thematic analysis, the criteria differentiating the attitude of Ukrainians to the war, viz. personalization/depersonalization, media practice of content consumption, assessment of the so called “we-they-relationship”, reflection on the changes in daily life, the process of adaptation to changes, ideas of exemplary behavior were established. Results and conclusion. The analysis of the results enabled to outline the problematic field of assessment of the attitude of Ukrainians to the full-scale war on Russia and reflection of this attitude in the discourse of daily life in wartime. Relying on the criteria differentiating this attitude, three typical positions in the attitude of Ukrainians to the war were outlined – that of external observer, optimistic fatalist, and rational optimist. Practical application. Clarification of the specific characteristics of the attitude of Ukrainians to the war and perception of the enemy under such circumstances enables to envisage the public opinion response to certain decisions related to the full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine, to plan communication campaigns promoting volunteer movement with due account of different positions taken by Ukrainians as well as to determine the degree of psycho-traumatizing of individuals in the crisis situation of war via discourse. Originality/Cognitive value. The study was conducted in October-November 2022, on the ninth month of the full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine, and it reflects the thoughts of Ukrainian civilians concerning the war, its reasons, collective responsibility of Russians, and, finally, changes occurring in the life of the country and every individual, the process of adaptation to this complex situation. The use of quality methods (semi-structured interview) for the study ensured focusing on subjective peculiarities of the perception of war and daily life during in wartime. Conclusions: The typology of ideas, types of attitude of Ukrainians to the reality of war requires verification and further specification within a quantitative study aimed at clarification of quantitative figures representing the prevalence of the established positions.

Keywords

EN

Russian-Ukrainian war; daily life in the wartime; qualitative research methods; war discourse; position of an outside observer; position of an optimistic fatalist; position of a rational optimist

• Publisher: Fundacja Pro Scientia Publica
• Journal: Journal of Education Culture and Society
• Year: 2023
• Volume: 14
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 526-550

Dates

published

2023

Contributors

author

Larysa Klymanska

• Department of Sociology and Social Work, Lviv Polytechnic National University vul. Konovaltsia 4 Lviv, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000000236937503

author

Maryna Klimanska

• Faculty of Philosophy, Department of Psychology, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv vul. Universytetska 1 Lviv, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000000230472346

author

Inna Haletska

• Faculty of Philosophy, Department of Psychology, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv vul. Universytetska 1 Lviv, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000000293192229

References

• Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Doubleday.
• Borkan, J. (1999). Immersion/Crystallisation. In B. F. Crabtree & W. L. Miller (Eds.), Doing qualitative research (pp. 179-194). Sage Publications.
• Brągiel, A., & Gambin, M. (2022). Depressive symptoms and psychological pain experienced by Polish adults in the context of both the war in Ukraine and the COVID-19 pandemic. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/h2yex.
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2014). What can “thematic analysis” offer health and wellbeing researchers? International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 9, Article 26152. https://doi.org/ 10.3402/qhw.v9.26152.
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019) Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589-597, https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806.
• Cicourel, A. (1972). Basic and normativ rules in the negotiation of status and role. In D. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in the social interaction (pp. 229-258). Free Press.
• Hajek, A., Kretzler, B., & König, H. H. (2022). Fear of war and mental health in Germany. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-022-02394-9.
• Haletska, I., Klimanska, M., Klymanska, L., & Fediv, I. (2022). Chasova perspektyva rezyliientnosti v umovakh voiennoho stanu [Time perspective of resilience in the time of war]. Aktualni aspekty psykholohichnoho zabezpechennia profesiinoi diialnosti syl bezpeky ta oborony Ukrainy. Materialy VIII vseukrainskoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii. http://books.ndcnangu.co.ua/Konfertmcii/Konf_NANGU_30.11.2022.pdf.
• Har, M. (2022). Voiennyi dyskurs: protsesy neolohizatsii [War discourse: neologization]. Transcarpathian Philological Studies, 24(1), 160-166. https://doi.org/10.32782/tps2663-4880/2022.24.1.31.
• Hobfoll, S., Spielberger, C., Breznitz, S., Figley, C., Folkman, S., Lepper-Green, B., Meichenbaum, D., Milgram, N., Sandier, I., Sarason, I., & van der Kolk, B. (1991). War-related stress: Addressing the stress of war and other traumatic events. American Psychologist, 46(8), 848-855. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.46.8.848.
• Hobfoll, S., Stevens, N., & Zalta, A. (2015). Expanding the science of resilience: Conserving resources in the aid of adaptation. Psychological Inquiry, 26(2), 174-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2015.1002377.
• Johnson, R., Antonaccio, O., Botchkovar, E., & Hobfoll, S. (2022). War trauma and PTSD in Ukraine’s civilian population: comparing urban-dwelling to internally displaced persons. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 57(9), 1807-1816. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s00127-021-02176-9.
• Khraban, T. (2022). Adoption of coping strategies by Ukrainian civilians in the first fifteen days after the outbreak of military conflict in 2022. Insight: The Psychological Dimensions of Society, 7, 59–74. https://doi.org/10.32999/2663-970X/2022-7-5.
• Klimanska, M, Klymanska L, & Haletska, I. (2020). The lens, frames and patterns of ukrainians: how perception of threats and risk determines behavior in the COVID-19 situation. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 11(2), 444-460. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2020.2.444.460.
• Klymanska, L., Klimanska, M., & Haletska, I. (2021). The Year of Enduring COVID-19: Typology of Attitudes Displayed by Health Care Professionals in Ukraine. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 12(2), 375-398. https://doi.org/0.15503/jecs2021.2.375.398.
• Klymanska, L., & Lutsychyn, H. (2022). Praktyky spozhyvannia kontentu media v suchasnomu informatsiinomu suspilstvi i formuvannia hromadianskoi kultury [Practices of consuming media content in the modern information society and the formation of civic culture]. Perspektyvy. Sotsialno-politychnyi zhurnal, 2, 166-177. https://doi.org/10.24195/spj1561-1264.2022.2.21.
• Mărcău, F., Peptan, C., Gorun, H., Băleanu, V., & Gorman, V. (2022). Analysis of the impact of the armed conflict in Ukraine on the population of Romania. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, Article 964576. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.964576.
• Ridley, M. (2010). The rational optimist: How prosperity evolves. Harper Collins
• Schutz, A., & Luckman, T. (2004). Struktury` zhy`ttyesvitu [The structures of the life-world]. Ukrainskyi tsentr dukhovnoi kultury.
• Singh, N., Bogdanov, S., Doty, B., Haroz, E., Girnyk, A., Chernobrovkina, V., Murray, L., Bass, J., & Bolton, P. (2021). Experiences of mental health and functioning among conflict-affected populations: A qualitative study with military veterans and displaced persons in Ukraine. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 91(4), 499-513. doi.org/10.1037/ort0000537.
• Skwirczyńska, E., Kozłowski, M., Nowak, K., Wróblewski, O., Sompolska-Rzechuła, A., Kwiatkowski, S., & Cymbaluk-Płoska, A. (2022). Anxiety assessment in Polish students during the Russian–Ukrainian war. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(20), Article 13284. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013284.
• Summerfield, D. (1999). A critique of seven assumptions behind psychological trauma programmes in war-affected areas. Social Science & Medicine, 48(10), 1449-1462. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00450-x.
• Surzykiewicz, J., Skalski, S., Niesiobędzka, M., Gladysh, O., & Konaszewski, K. (2022). Brief screening measures of mental health for war-related dysfunctional anxiety and negative persistent thinking. Personality and Individual Differences, 195, Article 111697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111697.
• Vasiutynskyi, V., Gornostai, P., Hubeladze, I., Naydonova, L., Slyusarevskyy, M., & Chunikhina S. (Eds.). (2022). Terminolohichnyi slovnyk rosiisko-ukrainskoi viiny [Terminological dictionary of the Russian-Ukrainian war]. Institute of Social and Political Psychology of National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine. https://cutt.ly/C9WZyVB
• Waldenfels, B. (1991) Povsiednievnost kak plavilnyi tihl ratsyonalnosti [Everyday life as a melting pot of rationality]. In V. Vinokurova & A. Filipova (Eds.), Sotsyo-Lohos (pp. 39-50). Prohress.
• Waldenfels, B. (2022). Nostra res agitur (Sprava stosuietsia nas) [Nostra res agitur (The matter concerns us)]. The Independent Cultural Journal “Ї”. https://www.ji-magazine.lviv.ua/2022/Nostra%20res%20agitur.htm.

Identifiers

DOI

10.15503/jecs2023.1.526.550

Biblioteka Nauki

18104898