ESL Teachers’ Approaches towards the Acceptance of Educational Technology Integration in Non-Formal Education: A Case from Kenya

• Authors: Laura Kildė

Abstracts

EN

Aim. In efforts to handle the negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, language schools in Kenya were forced to organise a smooth transition from physical to virtual classroom by incorporating educational technologies in virtual learning and teaching processes. Such a shift was new to teachers and required additional efforts to master the peculiarities of organising virtual English classes. Thus, this study aims to explore Kenyan ESL teachers’ perspectives towards the acceptance of educational technology integration in non-formal education. Methods. A qualitative approach was adopted in this study. Eleven teachers from two private foreign language schools participated in semi-structured in-depth interviews, where they answered questions based on the elements of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Results. The findings showed that most teachers’ approaches towards the acceptance of educational technologies were mainly positive and they intend to integrate them in their ESL classroom. The results of the qualitative data analysis also demonstrated that age is one of those personal characteristics that might hinder teachers’ willingness to adopt educational technologies while teaching ESL. Conclusions. This study also found that the variety of adopted educational technologies was not extensive. Therefore, teachers’ awareness, interest, and digital competences should be further developed. Practical application. The herein presented research findings are of a significant importance for the enhancement of teachers’ competences to apply educational technologies while teaching ESL in Kenya. It also has implications for the practice that is relevant for ESL teachers in non-formal education as well as curriculum organisers.

Keywords

EN

online learning technologies; Technology Acceptance Model (TAM); English as a Second Language; non-formal education; educational technologies

• Publisher: Fundacja Pro Scientia Publica
• Journal: Journal of Education Culture and Society
• Year: 2023
• Volume: 14
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 634-649

Dates

published

2023

Contributors

author

Laura Kildė

• Vilnius University Business School Sauletekio av. 22, LT-10225 Vilnius, Lithuania

• https://orcid.org/0000000166994675

References

• Anumanthan, S., & Hashim, H. (2022) Improving the learning of regular verbs through TikTok among primary school ESL pupils. Creative Education, 13, 896-912. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2022.133059
• Arthanat, S., Vroman, K. G., Lysack, C., & Grizzetti, J. (2018). Multi-stakeholder perspectives on information communication technology training for older adults: Implications for teaching and learning. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol., 14(5), 453-461. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2018.1493752
• Bawadi, H., Rahim, H. A., Moawad, J., Shami, R., Du, X., El-Awaysi, A., Al-Moslih, A. M. I., Diab, M., & Al-Jayyousi, G. D. (2022). Health sciences students’ and instructors’ perceptions of the emergency switch to virtual internship amid the COVID-19 pandemic: A case from Qatar. Front. Med., 9, 939416. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.939
• Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2012). Factors influencing teachers’ adoption and integration of information and communication technology into teaching: A review of the literature. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 8(1), 136-155.
• Boonmoh, A., Jumpakate, T., & Karpklon, S. (2021). Teachers’ perceptions and experience in using technology for the classroom. Computer-Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal (CALL-EJ), 22(1), 1-24.
• Bower, M. & Torrington, J. (2020). Typology of ree Web-based Learning Technologies. Macquarie University.
• Burden, P. R. (1982). Developmental supervision: Reducing tteacher stress at different career stages. [Unpublished Dissertation]. Kansas State University.
• Burkšaitienė, N., Lesčinskij, R., Suchanova, J., & Šliogerienė, J. (2021). Self-directedness for sustainable learning in university studies: Lithuanian students’ perspective. Sustainability, 13, 9467. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169467
• Chen, X. B. (2013). Tablets for informal language learning: Student usage and attitudes. Language Learning & Technology, 17(1), 20-36.
• Creswell, J. W. & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications.
• Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
• Dhillon, J. K. & Wanjiru, J. (2013). Challenges and strategies for teachers and learners of English as a second language: The case of an urban primary school in Kenya. International Journal of English Linguistics, 3(2), 14-24.
• Dogan, A. & Akbarov, A. (2016). Teachers’ attitudes toward the usage of mobile devices in EFL classroom. European Journal of Educational Research, 5(1), 11-17. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.5.1.11
• Drew, C. & Mann, A. (2018). Unfitting, uncomfortable, unacademic: a sociological reading for an interactive mobile phone app in university lectures. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0125-y
• Elo, S., & Kyngas, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
• Ferreira, C. M. & Serpa, S. (2018). Informed consent in social sciences research: Ethical challenges. International Journal of Social Science Studies, 6(5), 13-23.
• Ghani, M. T. A., Hamzah, M., Ramli, S., Daud, W. A, A. W., Romli, R. R. M., & Mokhtar, N. N. M. (2019). A questionnaire-based approach on technology acceptance model for mobile digital game-based learning. Journal of Global Business and Social Entrepreneurship, 5(14), 11-21.
• Gilakjani, A. P., Leong, L. M., & Ismail, H. N. (2013). Teachers’ use of technology and constructivism. I. J. Modern Education and Computer Science, 4, 49-63. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijmecs.2013.04.07
• Hamidi, F., Meshkat, M., Rezaee, M., & Jafari, M. (2011). Information technology in education. Procedia Computer Science, 3, 369-373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2010.12.062
• Kadiyala, M., & Crynes, L. B. (2013). A review of literature on effectiveness of use of information technology in education. The Research Journal for Engineering Education, 89(2), 177-189. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2000.tb00512.x
• Kardelis, K. (2017). Mokslinių tyrimų metodologija ir metodai (edukologija ir kiti socialiniai mokslai) [Research methodology and methods (education science and other social sciences)]. Textbook. 6th Revised and Augmented Edition. Science and encyclopedia publishing centre.
• Kelvin, Y. K. W., & Kim Hua, T. (2020). ESL teachers’ intention in adopting online educational technologies during COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 7(4), 387-394. https://doi.org/ 0.20448/journal.509.2020.74.387.394
• Koksal, D. (2004). To kill the blackboard? Technology in language teaching and learning. The Turkish Online Journal of Education Technology, 3(3), 62-72.
• Palacios Hidalgo, F. J., Gomez Parra, M. E., & Huertas Abril, C. A. (2020). Digital and media competences: Key competences for EFL teachers. Teaching English with Technology, 20(1), 43-59.
• Pazilah, F. N., Hashim, H., & Yunus, M. Md. (2019). Using technology in ESL Classroom: Highlights and Challenges. Creative Education, 10, 3205-3212. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.1012244
• Ratheeswari, K. (2018). Information communication technology in education. Journal of Applied and Advanced Research, 3(1), 45-47. https://dx.doi.org/10.21839/jaar.2018.v3S1.169
• Ramsin, A. & Mayall, H. J. (2019). Assessing ESL learners’ online learning self-efficacy in Thailand: Are they ready? Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 18, 467-479. https://doi.org/10.28945/4452
• Rupšienė, L. (2007). Kokybinio tyrimo duomenų rinkimo metodologija: metodinė knyga [Data collection methodology for qualitative research: a methodical book]. Klaipėda University Publishing House.
• Shah, P. M., & Empungan, J. L. (2015). ESL teachers’ attitudes towards using ICT in literature lessons. International Journal of English Language Education, 3(1), 201-218. http://doi.org/10.5296/ijele.v3i1.7158
• Shih, H. P. (2004). Extended technology acceptance model of Internet utilization behaviour. Information & Management, 41(6), 719-729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.08.009
• Shukor, S. S. (2015). ESL students’ perceptions on the use of Facebook as a collaborative writing tool in improving writing performance. The Asian Journal of English Language & Pedagogy, 3, 205-227.
• Stein, H., Gurevich, I., & Gorev, D. (2020). Integration of technology by novice mathematics teachers – what facilitates such integration and what makes it difficult? Educ Inf Technol, 25, 141–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09950-y
• Undi, V. A., & Hashim, H. (2021). The demands of 21st century learning: A study on primary school teachers’ attitutes towards using ICT in English as a second language (ESL) classrooms. Creative Education, 12, 1666-1678. http://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2021.127127
• Yang, H. (2020). Secondary school students’ perspectives of utilizing Tik Tok for English learning in and beyond the EFL classroom. 3rd International Conference on Education Technology and Social Science, Tianjin, China.
• Zureick, A. H., Burk-Rafel, J., Purkiss, J. A., & Hortsch, M. (2018). The interrupted learner: How distractions during live and video lectures influence learning outcomes. Anat. Sci. Educ., 11, 366–376.

Identifiers

DOI

10.15503/jecs2023.1.634.649

Biblioteka Nauki

18690201