Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2023 | 80 | 152-171

Article title

Models of Neighbourhood Governance: Case of Poland

Authors

Content

Title variants

PL
Modele zarządzania na poziomie dzielnic: przypadek polski

Languages of publication

Abstracts

PL
W artykule zaproponowano nowe modele zarządzania na poziomie dzielnic i ich typologię, które pozwalają zrozumieć, skategoryzować i porównać struktury zarządzania dzielnicowego na obszarach miejskich. Modele oparto na układzie instytucjonalnym i funkcjonalnym, w którym charakter modelu określają tworzone organy, ich kompetencje i instrumenty ich realizacji wraz z wielkością środków finansowych, którymi dysponują. W rezultacie powstały trzy alternatywne modele (administracyjny, pośredni i partycypacyjny). Druga część artykułu zawiera wyniki badań przeprowadzonych w 66 polskich miastach na prawach powiatu. Ich systemy zarządzania dzielnicami zostały skategoryzowane i umieszczone w ramach proponowanych modeli. Wykazano, że tylko Warszawa wdrożyła model administracyjny, a w większości miast funkcjonuje model pośredni i partycypacyjny.
EN
The paper proposes new models of neighbourhood governance and their typology, which enable to understand, categorise and compare the neighbourhood governance structures in the urban areas. The models were based on the institutional and functional setting, in which the bodies created, their competences and instruments for their implementation, along with the amount of financial means at their disposal define the character of the model. As a result, three alternative models were created (administrative, intermediate, and participative). The second part contains the results of research conducted in 66 Polish county cities. Their neighbourhood governance systems were categorized and put into the frames of the proposed models. It was proved that only Warsaw implemented the administrative model, and most of the cities practice the intermediate and participative models.

Year

Volume

80

Pages

152-171

Physical description

Dates

published
2023

Contributors

  • SGH Warsaw School of Economics

References

  • Ahlbrandt, R.S. (1984). Neighborhoods, People, and Community. London: Plenum Press.
  • Arnstein, S.R. (1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. DOI: 10.1080/01944366908977225.
  • Barton, H. (2000). Do Neighbourhoods Matter? In: H. Barton (Ed.). Sustainable Communities: The Potential for Eco-Neighbourhoods (pp. 49–65). London: Earthscan.
  • Barton, H., Grant, M., & Guise, R. (2021). Shaping Neighbourhoods: For Local Health and Global Sustainability. Routledge: New York.
  • Benington, J. (2006, November). Introduction: Reclaiming the Neighbourhood. In: J. Benington, J. de Groot, & J. Foot (Eds.). Lest We Forget: Democracy, Neighbourhoods and Government (pp. 8–18). London: SOLACE Foundation Imprints. Retrieved from: http://www.janefoot.co.uk/downloads/files/Lest%20we%20forget.pdf.
  • Blakeley, G. (2010). Governing Ourselves: Citizen Participation and Governance in Barcelona and Manchester. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34(1), 130–145. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00953.x.
  • Blokland, T. (2003). Urban Bonds. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Callanan, M. (2005). Institutionalizing Participation and Governance? New Participative Structures in Local Government in Ireland. Public Administration, 83(4), 909–929. DOI: 10.1111/j.0033-3298.2005.00483.x.
  • Copus, C. (2018). Decentralisation, Democratisation and Delivery: English Submunicipal Devolution. In: N.K. Hlepas, N. Kersting, S. Kuhlmann, P. Swianiewicz, & F. Teles (Eds.). Sub-Municipal Governance in Europe: Decentralization Beyond the Municipal Tier (pp. 69–91). Cham: Palgrave. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-64725-8_4.
  • Durose, C., & Lowndes, V. (2010). Neighbourhood Governance: Contested Rationales within a Multi-Level Setting – A Study of Manchester. Local Government Studies, 36(3), 341–359. DOI: 10.1080/03003931003730477.
  • García, M. (2006). Citizenship Practices and Urban Governance in European Cities. Urban Studies, 43(4), 745–765. DOI: 10.1080/00420980600597491.
  • Griggs, S., & Roberts, M. (2012). From Neighbourhood Governance to Neighbourhood Management: A ‘Roll-Out’ Neo-Liberal Design for Devolved Governance in the United Kingdom? Local Government Studies, 38(2), 183–210. DOI: 10.1080/03003930.2011.630460.
  • Hlepas, N., Kersting, N., Kuhlmann, S., Swianiewicz, P., & Teles F. (2018a). Introduction: Decentralization Beyond the Municipal Tier. In: N. Hlepas, N. Kersting, S. Kuhlmann, P. Swianiewicz, & F. Teles (Eds.). Sub-Municipal Governance in Europe: Decentralization Beyond the Municipal Tier (pp. 1–22). Cham: Palgrave. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-64725-8_1.
  • Hlepas, N., Swianiewicz, P., & Kersting, N. (2018b). Conclusions. In: N. Hlepas, N. Kersting, S. Kuhlmann, P. Swianiewicz, & F. Teles (Eds.). Sub-Municipal Governance in Europe: Decentralization Beyond the Municipal Tier (pp. 247–259). Cham: Palgrave. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-64725-8_12.
  • Johnson, C., & Osborne, S.P. (2003). Local Strategic Partnerships, Neighbourhood Renewal, and the Limits to Co-governance. Public Money & Management, 23(3), 147–154. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9302.00362.
  • Keil, A. (2006). New Urban Governance Processes on the Level of Neighbourhoods. European Planning Studies, 14(3), 335–364. DOI: 10.1080/09654310500420826.
  • Kennett, P., & Forrest, R. (2006). The Neighbourhood in a European Context. Urban Studies, 43(4), 713–718. DOI: 10.1080/00420980600597368.
  • Kooiman, J. (2005). Governing as Governance. London: Sage.
  • Lowndes, V., & Sullivan, H. (2008). How Low Can You Go? Rationales and Challenges for Neighbourhood Governance. Public Administration, 86(1), 53–74. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00696.x.
  • Lysek, J. (2018). The ‘Little Town-Halls’ in the Czech Republic: An Unexploited Potential of Functional Decentralization. In: N. Hlepas, N. Kersting, S. Kuhlmann, P. Swianiewicz, & F. Teles (Eds.). Sub-Municipal Governance in Europe: Decentralization Beyond the Municipal Tier (pp. 41–68). Cham: Palgrave. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319- 64725-8_3.
  • Madej, M. (2022). Ancillary Units as a Tool of Sublocal Governance in the Polish Major Cities. Polish Political Science Yearbook, 51, 133–152. DOI: 10.15804/ppsy202213.
  • Mintzberg, H. (1983). Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations. Eaglewoods Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Montgomery, Ch. (2013). Happy City: Transforming Our Lives Through Urban Design. London: Penguin Books.
  • Pill, M., & Bailey, N. (2012). Community Empowerment or a Strategy of Containment? Evaluation Neighbourhood Governance in the City of Westminster. Local Government Studies, 38(6), 731–751. DOI: 10.1080/03003930.2012.679934.
  • Prak, N.L., & Priemus, H. (1986). A Model for the Analysis of the Decline of Postwar Housing. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 10(1), 1–7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.1986.tb00001.x.
  • Rhodes, R.A.W. (1997). Understanding Governance – Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Somerville, P., van Beckhoven, E., & van Kempen, R. (2009). The Decline and Rise of Neighbourhoods: The Importance of Neighbourhood Governance. European Journal of Housing Policy, 9(1), 25–44. DOI: 10.1080/14616710802693557.
  • Swianiewicz, P. (2014). Intra-Municipal Units in Urban Political Systems in Poland: Vicious Roundabout of Marginalization or Dead-End Street? The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 7(2), 173–198. DOI: 10.2478/nispa-2014-0008.
  • Swianiewicz, P. (2018). New Experiments of Maintenance of Old Traditions? Dual System of Sub-municipal Units in Poland. In: N. Hlepas, N. Kersting, S. Kuhlmann, P. Swianiewicz, & F. Teles (Eds.). Sub-Municipal Governance in Europe: Decentralization Beyond the Municipal Tier (pp. 167–192). Cham: Palgrave. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-64725-8_8.
  • Swianiewicz, P., Krukowska, J., Lackowska, M., & Kurniewicz, A. (2013). Błędne rondo marginalizacji? Jednostki pomocnicze samorządu w zarządzaniu dużymi miastami. Warszawa: Elipsa Dom Wydawniczy i Handlowy, 2013.
  • Swyngedouw, E., & Moulaert, F. (2010). Socially Innovative Projects, Governance Dynamics and Urban Change: Between State and Self-Organisation. In: F. Moulaert, F. Martinelli, E. Swyngedouw, & S. González (Eds.). Can Neighbourhoods Save the City? Community Development and Social Innovation (pp. 219–234). New York– London: Routledge.
  • Taylor, M., & Wilson, M. (2006). The Importance of the Neighbourhood: Tackling the Implementation Gap. London: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
  • van Assche, D., & Dierickx, G. (2007). The Decentralization of City Government and the Restoration of Political Trust. Local Government Studies, 33(1), 25–47. DOI: 10.1080/03003930601081069.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
25806049

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_15804_athena_2023_80_09
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.