Судова cистема Європейського Союзу

• Authors: Ilona Kaminska

Title variants

EN

Judicial System of the European Union

Abstracts

UK

Здійснено комплексний аналіз положень Договору про Європейський Союз, які визначають основні цінності, цілі, зобов’язання держав-членів та порядок забезпечення ефективного судового захисту в правопорядку ЄС. Встановлено, що впровадження основних цінностей є спільним завданням інституцій ЄС та національних державних органів. Обґрунтовано, що дотримання верховенства права в ЄС забезпечується у спосіб здійснення ефективного судового захисту прав у сферах, на які поширюється законодавство ЄС. Ефективний судовий захист забезпечується національними судовими органами спільно з Судом ЄС у спосіб реалізації механізму, передбаченого статтею 267 Договору про функціонування ЄС. Доведено, що єдність цілей, спільність функцій, рівність правового статусу та єдині стандарти організації судових систем та принципи здійснення правосуддя об’єднують національні суди та Судом ЄС в єдину судову систему ЄС. Доведено, що єдність мети функціонування, спільність вимог до правового 30 Ілона Камінська статусу, єдині стандарти та принципи здійснення правосуддя, встановлені для суддів Суду ЄС та суддів національних судів, є ознаками їх приналежності до єдиної судової системи ЄС.

EN

A comprehensive analysis of the provisions of the Treaty on European Union, which define the basic values, objectives, obligations of Member States and the procedure for ensuring effective judicial protection in the EU legal order. It has been established that the implementation of core values is a common task of the EU institutions and national state bodies. It is substantiated that the rule of law in the EU is ensured by effective judicial protection of rights in the areas covered by EU law. Effective judicial protection is provided by national courts together with the Court of Justice in the manner of implementing the mechanism provided for in Article 267 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU. It has been proven that the unity of purpose, common functions, equality of legal status and common standards of judicial organization and principles of administration of justice unite national courts and the Court of Justice into a single EU judicial system. It is proposed to define the concept of “EU judicial system”, namely, the EU judicial system is a set of EU judicial institutions, namely integration institutions (EU Court within the TEU) and national courts of the Member States (higher courts, constitutional bodies), principles of functioning provided by the EU legal order, which jointly perform the functions of judicial control and effective judicial protection in the European region, interact with each other and ensure the establishment of the rule of law in the EU. Judges of the EU judiciary have the same requirements for age, qualifications, independence and impartiality, which are the common organizational principles of the EU judiciary. All judges of the EU judiciary are obliged to adhere to the principles of proceedings set out in the Charter and the Convention. It is proved that the unity of purpose, common requirements for legal status, common standards and principles of justice established for judges of the Court of Justice and judges of national courts are signs of their belonging to a single EU judicial system.

Keywords

UK

Суд ЄС; функції судової системи ЄС; верховенство права; національні судові органи; європейський мандат суддів.

EN

EU; rule of law; national judiciary; European mandate of judges

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
• Journal: Krakowskie Studia Małopolskie
• Year: 2021
• Volume: 3(31)
• Pages: 10-31

Dates

published

2021

Contributors

author

Ilona Kaminska

• National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

References

• Berezhna, K.V. (2015). Pererozpodil yurysdyktsii sudovykh orhaniv Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu pislia Lisabonskoi reformy [Redistribution of jurisdiction of the judicial authorities of the European Union after the Lisbon Reform]. Aktualni problemy vitchyznianoi yurysprudentsii – Actual problems of native jurisprudence, 5, 145–153 [in Ukrainian].
• Case C 64/16: Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses v Tribunal de Contas, C 64/16, ECLI:EU:C:2018:117. URL: https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=199682&pageIndex=0&doclang=en&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=1102490.
• Case C 216/18 PP: relating to the execution of European arrest warrants issued against LM, C 216/18 PP, ECLI:EU:C:2018:586. URL: https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=204384&pageIndex=0&doclang=en&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=6546774.
• Case C 824/18: A.B., C.D., E.F., G.H., I.J. v Krajowa Rada Sądownictwa, intervening parties: Prokurator Generalny, Rzecznik Praw Obywatelskich, C 824/18, ECLI:EU:C:2021:153. URL: https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=238382&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=6553755.
• Case C 896/19: Repubblika v Il-Prim Ministru, intervening party: WY, C 896/19, ECLI:EU:C:2021:311. URL: https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=240084&pageIndex=0&doclang=en&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=6550947.
• COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS 2020 Rule of Law Report The rule of law situation in the European Brussels, 2020. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0580.
• Hartija osnovnyh prav Evropejskogo Sojuza: Hartija Evropejskogo Sojuza ot 07.12.2000 g. [The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union on 07.12.2000]. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_524 [in Russian].
• Komarova, T.V. (2018). Orhanizatsiia sudovoi systemy Yevropeiskoho soiuzu [Organization of the judicial system of the European Union]. Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii pravovykh nauk Ukrainy – Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, Vol. 25, issue 1, 79–96 [in Ukrainian].
• Konventsiia pro zakhyst prav liudyny i osnovopolozhnykh svobod: Konventsiia Rady Yevropy vid 04.11.1950 r. stanom na 02.10.2013 r. [European Convention on Human Rights on 04.11.1950]. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_004 [in Ukrainian].
• Krotinov, V.A. (2016). Perezavantazhennia sudovykh system YeS i Ukrainy: spilni potreby ta pryntsypy [Restart of Judicial Systems of the EU and Ukraine: Common Needs and Principles]. Naukovi zapysky Instytutu zakonodavstva Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy – Scientific Papers of the Legislation Institute of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 1, 151–158 [in Ukrainian].
• Neframi E. La force intégrative du statut de l’Etat membre sur la fonction juridictionnelle. URL: https://orbilu.uni.lu/bitstream/10993/31773/1/fonction%20juridictionnelle%20et%20statut%20Etat%20membre.pdf.
• Operacija «Sudebnaja metla»: nazvany imena delegatov v Jeticheskij sovet po proverke VSP ot posol’stv SShA, ES i mezhdunarodnyh organizacij, SPISOK [Operation Judicial Broom: the names of delegates to the Ethical Council for Verification of the HCJ from the embassies of the USA, EU and international organizations have been announced, LIST]. (2021). Sudebno-juridicheskaja gazeta. URL: https://sud.ua/ru/news/publication/213256-operatsiya-sudebnaya-metla-nazvany-imena-delegatov-v-eticheskiy-sovet-po-proverke-vsp-ot-posolstv-ssha-es-i-mezhdunarodnykh-organizatsiy-spisok [in Russian].
• Posol ES v Ukraine Matti Maasikas: «Uspeshnaja sudebnaja reforma stanet luchshej zashhitoj ukrainskoj sudebnoj sistemy», jekskljuzivnoe interv’ju [EU Ambassador to Ukraine Matti Maasikas: “Successful judicial reform will be the best defense for the Ukrainian judicial system”, exclusive interview]. (2021). Sudebno-juridicheskaja gazeta. URL: https://sud.ua/ru/news/publication/215887-posol-es-v-ukraine-matti-maasikas-uspeshnaya-sudebnaya-reforma-stanet-luchshey-zaschitoy-ukrainskoy-sudebnoy-sistemy-eksklyuzivnoe-intervyu [in Russian].
• Pro vnesennia zmin do deiakykh zakonodavchykh aktiv Ukrainy shchodo poriadku obrannia (pryznachennia) na posady chleniv Vyshchoi rady pravosuddia ta diialnosti dystsyplinarnykh inspektoriv Vyshchoi rady pravosuddia: Zakon Ukrainy vid 14.07.2021 r. № 1635-IX [On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine Concerning the Procedure for Election (Appointment) to the Position of Members of the High Council of Justice and Activities of Disciplinary Inspectors of the High Council of Justice: Law of Ukraine of July 14, 2021 № 1635-IX]. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1635-20#Text.
• Pro vnesennia zmin do Zakonu Ukrainy “Pro sudoustrii i status suddiv” ta deiakykh zakoniv Ukrainy shchodo vidnovlennia roboty Vyshchoi kvalifikatsiinoi komisii suddiv Ukrainy: Zakon Ukrainy vid 13.07.2021 r. № 1629-IX [On Amendments to the Law of Ukraine “On the Judiciary and the Status of Judges” and some laws of Ukraine on the resumption of the work of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine: Law of Ukraine of July 13, 2021 № 1629-IX]. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1629-20#n5.
• Reshota, V.V. (2011). Yevropeiskyi sud pravosuddia u sudovii systemi Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu [European Court of Justice in the Judicial System of the European Union]. Naukovyi visnyk “Demokratychne vriaduvannia” – Academic papers collection “Democratic governance”, 8. URL: http://www.lvivacademy.com/vidavnitstvo_1/visnik8/fail/Reshota.pdf [in Ukrainian].
• Reshota, V.V. (2012). Zahalnyi sud ta sud publichnoi sluzhby u sudovii systemi YeS [General Court and Civil Cervice Tribunal in the Judicial System of the European Union]. Naukovyi visnyk “Demokratychne vriaduvannia” – Academic papers collection “Democratic governance”, URL: http://lvivacademy.com/vidavnitstvo_1/visnik10/fail/Reshota.pdf [in Ukrainian].
• Shevchuk, B.M. (2015). Zasady funktsionuvannia Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu [Fundamental principles of functioning of the European Union]. Efektyvnist derzhavnoho upravlinnia – Efficiency of public administration, issue 44(1), 21–28. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/efdu_2015_44%281%29__4 [in Ukrainian].
• Weiler, J.H.H., Sarmiento, D. EU Law Live Team. 2020. 6 July. URL: https://eulawlive.com/the-eu-judiciary-after-weiss-proposing-a-new-mixed-chamber-of-the-court-of-justice-a-reply-to-our-critics-by-j-h-h-weiler-and-daniel-sarmiento/.
• Yakoviuk, I.V. (2008). Yevropeiskyi Soiuz kriz pryzmu mizhnarodnoi orhanizatsii [European Union through the prism of an international organization]. Derzhavne budivnytstvo ta mistseve samovriaduvannia – Public administration and local government, 15, 58–67 [in Ukrainian].
• Yavorska, I.M. (2015). Rol i znachennia Sudu YeS u systemi orhaniv Yevropeiskyi Soiuzu [Role and importance of EU COURT of justice in the system of bodies the European Union]. Visnyk Lvivskoho universytetu. Seriia mizhnarodni vidnosyny – Visnyk of the Lviv University. Series international relations, issue 37, part 2, 82–88 [in Ukrainian].

Identifiers

DOI

10.15804/ksm20210301

Biblioteka Nauki

1930529