Validation of Cause-Effect Relationship in the Context of Organizational Citizenship Behaviour and its Antecedents: The Case of Asan Service in Azerbaijan

• Authors: Anar Zeynalov

Abstracts

EN

The current study validates the structural model of cause-effect relationship in light of organizational citizenship behaviour as a consequence and its determinants as causes, which ultimately generates a generalizable public service model for the countries that need substantial organizational transformation in public service delivery. The determinants of organizational citizenship behavior by taking a look into the social and personal factors that either drive an individual’s behavior drawing from the social circumstances at the moment of time, or personal motivation and inner characteristics that force an individual to act in favor or against good citizenship. To test the proposed research framework, post-community Azerbaijan’s ASAN Service is considered as the case. For the identification and validation of potential factors affecting organizational citizenship behaviour, the selected variables are employed as constructs of the conceptual framework, through which survey is designed and administered to collect data from the country citizens with regards of gauging the impact of the determinants. A quantitative methodological approach is selected, where data is collected through convenient sampling technique, while it is analysed using the structural equation modelling technique, with emphasis on AMOS v.24 software to test the structural model. The results of the hypothesized relations reveal that behavioural intention and organizational identification are strongly related to organizational citizenship behaviour, followed by distributive justice, public service motivation, selfconcept and goal clarity being secondary major determinants. However, procedural justice is not significant in predicting organizational citizenship behaviour, while subjective norm and task interdependence are weakly related to it.

Keywords

EN

organizational citizenship behaviour and its determinants; structural equation modelling

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
• Journal: Krakowskie Studia Małopolskie
• Year: 2021
• Volume: 3(31)
• Pages: 77-97

Dates

published

2021

Contributors

author

Anar Zeynalov

• Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

References

• Allen, Natalie J. John P. Meyer. (1990). The Measurement and Anteced¬ents of Affective, Continuance, and Normative Commitment to the Organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63 (1), 1–18.
• Allameh, S.M., Alinajimi, S., Kazemi, A. (2012). The effect of self-concept and organizational identity on organizational citizenship behavior (A case study in social security organization of Isfahan city). Interna¬tional Journal of Human Resource Studies, 2 (1), 175–187.
• Alotaibi, A.G. (2001). Antecedents of Organizational Citizenship Behav¬ior: A Study of Public Personnel in Kuwait. Public Personnel Manage¬ment, 30 (3), 363–376.
• Anderson, J.C., Gerbing, D.W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychologi¬cal Bulletin, 10(3), 411–423.
• Bentler, P.M., Chou, C.P. (1987). Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods & Research, 16(1), 78–117.
• Bolon, D.S. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior among hospital employees: a multidimensional analysis involving job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Hospital & Health Service Administration, 42, 221–41.
• Bolino, M.C., Turnley, W.H., Bloodgood, J.M. (2002). Citizenship behavior and the creation of social capital in organizations. Academy of Man¬agement Review, 27, 505–22.
• Cohen, S.G., Ledford, G.E. (1994). The effectiveness of self-managed teams: a quasi-experiment. Human Relations, 47, 13–43.
• Cohen, A., Vigoda, E. (2000). Do good citizens make good organizational citizens? An empirical examination of the relationship between gen¬eral citizenship and organizational citizenship behavior in Israel. Ad¬ministration & Society, 32, 596–624.
• Coyle-Shapiro, J. (2002). A Psychological Contract Perspective on Or¬ganizational Citizenship Behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(8), 927–946.
• Foote, D.A., Tang, L.-P. (2008). Job satisfaction and organizational citi¬zenship behavior (OCB). Does team commitment make a difference in self-directed teams? Management Decision, 46 (6), 933–947.
• Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Mar¬keting Research, 18(1), 39–50.
• Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ). Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs.
• Hair, J.R., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. (2006). Multivariate data anlysis (6th ). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson- Prentice Hall.
• Hinton, P.R., Brownlow, C., McMurray, I., Cozens, B. (2004). SPSS ex¬plained. London, UK: Routledge.
• Kline, R.B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation model¬ing. Guilford publications.
• Koys, D.J. (2001). The effects of employee satisfaction, organizational citizenship behavior, and turnover on organizational effectiveness: a unit-level, longitudinal study. Personnel Psychology, 54, 101–14.
• Organ, D. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
• Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Paine, J.B., Bachrach, D.G. (2000), Or¬ganizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513–563.
• Williams, L.J., Anderson, S.E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17, 601–617.

Identifiers

DOI

10.15804/ksm20210304

Biblioteka Nauki

1930521