Structuring the Concepts of the Image of the City in the Space-Time Continuum

• Authors: Iryna Boholiubova

Abstracts

EN

The global community has been overcoming the crisis of being in the city for almost a century. And we are trying to answer the problems of urban crises - how and why do they arise, which development path should the city take and is this step justified? The simplest way of overcoming the crisis by the city authorities is an irrational solution - to erase the past, and build a new one. In such cases, the historical layering of images of the city, which have a great cultural value, is not taken into account. The city government alone and the bunch of institutions interested exclusively in their own financial issues do not have the right to carry out any transformations of the urban image without the participation of the city society and persons competent in this matter. It is culturology, on the one hand, that makes it possible to implement a comprehensive understanding of transformations in the urban space, excluding the one-sided development of transformations from a technical and aesthetic point of view of urban planning. On the other hand, it allows awareness-raising activities among urban residents, teaching them a kind of literacy and critical thinking about the center of their existence. However, for this purpose there must be a certain strategy of work and social cohesion. So, having faced the problem of lack of convenient and at the same time comprehensive definition of the above-mentioned historical layering and the feasibility of transformations in the urban image, in this article I propose, in my opinion, mandatory and at the same time the main stage of work for institutions involved in urban planning. I have developed a model of systematization of concepts of the image of the city, which at this time have already formed a historical multi-layer of the city. This development demonstrated the ability to predict the “behavior” of urban transformations in the future, especially young cities, whose historical layers of images are still ahead, based on the calculation of adaptation maxima in the life of the concept of the city image.

Keywords

EN

image of the city; urban culturology; urban identity; history of the; city; systematization; structuring.

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
• Journal: Krakowskie Studia Małopolskie
• Year: 2021
• Volume: 3(31)
• Pages: 116-133

Dates

published

2021

Contributors

author

Iryna Boholiubova

• National Academy of Management of Culture and Arts in Kyiv

References

• ru (2021). Umnyj gorod. Koncepcija, standartizacija i realizacija smart siti [Smart city. Concept, standardization and implementation of smart city]. Available at: http://1234g.ru/novosti/smart-city (ac¬cessed 30 March 2021). [in Russian]
• ru (2013). Ocherk 10. Tri modeli gradoregulirovanija. Alek¬sandr Lozhkin ob utopicheskom, bozhestvennom i pravovom v gradostroitel’stve [Essay 10. Three models of urban regulation. Al¬exander Lozhkin on the utopian, divine and legal in urban planning]. Available at: https://archi.ru/russia/48733/ocherk-10-tri-modeli-gra¬doregulirovaniya (accessed 28 January 2021). [in Russian]
• ru (2013). Ocherk 5. Gorod kak organizm [Essay 5. City as an organism]. Available at: https://archi.ru/russia/45660/ocherk-5-gorod-kak-organizm (accessed 28 January 2021). [in Russian]
• ru (2006). Utopija. Kiberneticheskij gorod, 1969 god Nikolya Schoffer [Utopia. Cyber city]. Available at: https://archi.ru/press/rus-sia/2160/utopiya-kiberneticheskii-gorod-1969-god-nikolya-shoffer (accessed 06 April 2021). [in Russian]
• Artslooker (2020). Arhitektorka ta doslidnycja Jevgenija Gubkina pro radjans’ku spadshhynu ta osoblyvosti ukrai’ns’kogo modernizmu [Ar¬chitect and researcher Yevhenia Gubkina on the Soviet heritage and personalities of Ukrainian modernism]. Available at: https://artslooker.com/arhitektorka-ta-doslidnitcya-evgeniya-gubkina-pro-radyansku-spadshinu-ta-osoblivosti-ukrainskogo-mo/ (accessed 02 April 2021). [in Ukrainian]
• Baburov, A., Gutnov, A,. Djumenton G. et al. (1967). Novyj jelement rasselenija [A new element of settlement]. Moskow: Strojizdat. [in Russian]
• Bizhanova M., Magomedova P. (2006). K voprosu o traktovke ponjatija social’noj infrastruktury [On the question of interpretation of the concept of social infrastructure]. Transport business of Russia 12–1: 16–18. [in Russian]
• Boholiubova І. (2018). Reprezentacіja naslіdkіv vzajemodії mіs’koї і sіl’s’koї kul’tur v obrazі mіsta [Representation of the consequences of the interaction of urban and rural cultures in the image of the city]. Mіzhnarodnij vіsnik: kul’turologіja, fіlologіja, muzikoznavstvo ІІ (11): 47–52. [in Ukrainian]
• Ebenezer, H. (1911.) Goroda budushhego [Cities of the future]. Saint Petersburg: Tipografija t-va „Obshhestv. Pol’za”. [in Russian]
• Filippov, V. (2019). “Linejnyj gorod”: gradostroitel’nye i social’nye aspekty proekta Arturo Soria [“Linear City”: Urban development and social aspects of the Arturo Soria project]. Nauchno-tehnicheskij zhurnzl «Vestnik grazhdanskih inzhenerov» 5(76): 55–67. Saint Petersburg: SPbGASU. [in Russian]
• Gutnov, A., Glazychev, V. (1990) .Mir arhitektury (Lico goroda) [World of architecture (Face of the city)]. Moskow: Molodaja gvardija. [in Rus¬sian]
• Herchanivska, P. (2015) .Kul’turologija. Terminologichnyj slovnyk [Cultur¬ology. Terminological dictionary]. Kyiv: Milenium. [in Ukrainian]
• Holdzamt, E., Shvydkovskyi, O. (1985). Gradostroytel’naja kul’tura ev¬ropejskyh socyalystycheskyh stran [Urban culture of European social¬ist countries]. Moscow: Stroyizdat. [in Russian]
• Ignatev, M. (2016). Prosto kibernetika [Just cybernetics]. Saint Peters¬burg: Strata. [in Russian]
• Ikonnikov, A. (1985). Yskusstvo, sreda, vremja. Jestetycheskaja organ¬yzacyja gorodskoj sredy [Art, environ, time. Aesthetic organization of the urban environment]. Moscow: Sovetskij hudozhnik. [in Russian]
• Lukoms’ka, Z. (2018). Mistobuduvannja Zahidnoi’ Ukrai’ny epohy baroko (ser. XVII ST. – kin. XVIII st.) [Urban planning of Western Ukraine in the Baroque era (middle XVII – end XVIII)]. Dr dissertation, Lviv Polytechnic National University, UA. [in Uktrainian]
• Lypa, K. (2016). Teorija arhitektury, mistyka i vijna [Theory of architecture, mysticism and war]. Kyiv: Laurus. [in Ukrainian]
• Petryshyn, H., Posatskyi, B., Kryvoruchko, Yu et al. (2016). Mistobudivne proektuvannja. Chastyna I: Misto jak objekt proektuvannja [Urban planning. Part 1: The city as an object of design]. Lviv: Vydavnyctvo L’vivs’koi’ politehniky. [in Ukrainian]
• Repin, Yu (2009) Prostranstvennyj gorod. Teorija i praktika [Spatial city. Theory and practice]. Kyiv: Feniks. [in Russian]
• Safronova, A. (2011). Gorod – zhivoj organizm [The city is a living organism]. Vestnik IrGTU 12 (59): 148–152. [in Russian]
• Shtretling, S, Mishchenko, K. (Eds.). (2018). Ruhlyvyj prostir [Agile space]. Kyiv: AVANPOST-PRYM. [in Ukrainian]
• Smith, M. (2020). Mista. Pershi 6000 rokiv [Cities. The first 6000 years]. KM-Books. [in Ukrainian]
• Tolkovyj slovar’ Ozhegova (2008). Kibernetika [Cybernetics]. Available at: https://slovarozhegova.ru/word.php?wordid=11004 (accessed 17 January 2021). [in Russian]

Identifiers

DOI

10.15804/ksm20210306

Biblioteka Nauki

1930518