Methodological importance of legal constructions and their influence on the legal norms interpretation

• Authors: Vitalii Serediuk

Abstracts

EN

The article reveals the methodological significance of legal constructions and shows their influence on the interpretation of legal norms. It has been found that legal construction is one of the epistemological tools of legal science and means of interpreting legal norms in the process of their implementation. A concentrated expression of the possible conditions of law enforcement determines the methodological significance of legal constructions during the interpretation of legal norms. The legal construction is shown as a set of stable connections of the object, which ensure its integrity and identity. Emphasis is placed on the fact that intraindustry and inter-industry connections of legal norms allow law to preserve its properties as a regulatory in the face of internal and external changes, to be stable and stable. The existence of a stable structure determines the existence of law as a system is a condition for the existence of law. The author came to the conclusion that in order to optimize legal interpretation activity, it is necessary to improve the process of eliminating defects in legal constructions. The ambiguity and inconsistency of legal constructions is a consequence of the increase in the number of scientific terms, special expressions, contradictions and gaps in the normative material. The reason for this is hasty normative design without compliance with the requirements of legal technique. With the help of legal constructions, insightful, detailed and in-depth clarification of the content of legal norms is carried out.

Keywords

EN

law enforcement; legal technique; non-contradiction; law-making; normative design; estoppel

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
• Journal: Krakowskie Studia Małopolskie
• Year: 2023
• Volume: 2(38)
• Pages: 26-36

Dates

published

2023

Contributors

author

Vitalii Serediuk

• № 8049 Regional Service Center of the Main Service Center of the Ministry of Internal Affairs in Kyiv

• https://orcid.org/0000000224234931

References

• Babaev V.K. (ed.), Teorija gosudarstva i prava [Theory of the State and Law], Jurist, Moscow 2003.
• Barnett P., Res Judicata, Estoppel and Foreign Judgments: The Preclusive Effects of Foreign Judgments in Private International Law, OUP Oxford, 2001.
• Bojko G.I., Jurydychna konstrukcija jak osoblyva procedura pravotvorchosti [Legal construction as a special procedure of law-making], “Naukovyj visnyk Uzhgorods’kogo nacional’nogo universytetu. Serija: Pravo” 2014, 27(1), pp. 15–18.
• Bojko G.I., Rol’ jurydychnyh konstrukcij v procesi tlumachennja pravovyh norm [The role of legal constructions in the process of interpreting legal norms], Zahyst prav i svobod ljudyny ta gromadjanyna v umovah formuvannja pravovoi’ derzhavy: Materialy I Vseukrai’ns’koi’ naukovopraktychnoi’ konferencii’ (m. L’viv, 25 kvitnja 2012 r.), Navchal’nonaukovyj instytut prava ta psyhologii’ Nacional’nogo universytetu «L’vivs’ka politehnika», L’viv 2012, pp. 272–275.
• Fulej T., Lukas L., Sajc L., Provedennja ekspertyzy proektiv normatyvnopravovyh aktiv z vykorystannjam metodyky vyrishennja problem [Carrying out expert examination of projects of normative legal acts based on different methods of solving problems], FOP Moskalenko O.M., Kyiv 2013.
• Nelipovych (Bojko) G.I., Jurydychna konstrukcija jak zasib strukturuvannja pravovoi’ informacii’ [Legal constructure as a basis for the structure of legal information]: dys. kand. juryd. nauk: 12.00.01, L’viv 2017.
• Onyshchuk I.I., Tehnika jurydychnogo pys’ma v normatyvno-pravovyh aktah [Technique of legal writing in normative legal acts], Pravo, Harkiv 2019.
• Onyshсhuk I.I., Tehnika dokumental’nogo vyrazhennja zmistu normatyvnopravovogo akta [The technique of documentary expression of the content of a normative legal act], Universytets’ki naukovi zapysky Hmel’nyc’kogo universytetu upravlinnja ta prava, 2011, pp. 63–66.
• Onyshchuk I.I., Bojko G.I., Logika jurydychnogo konstrujuvannja [The logic of legal construction], “Naukovo-informacijnyj visnyk IvanoFrankivs’kogo universytetu prava im. Korolja Danyla Galyc’kogo” 2015, № 11, pp. 38–44.
• Rudashevskij B.B., Kudrjavcev V.N. (eds.), Pravo i modelirovanie. Metodologicheskie problemy sovetskoj juridicheskoj nauki [Law and modeling. Methodological problems of Soviet legal science], Nauka, Moscow 1980, pp. 290−308.
• Spasibo-Fateeva I.V. (ed.), Har’kovskaja civilisticheskaja shkola: v duhe tradicij [Kharkov civil school: in the spirit of traditions], Pravo, Har’kov 2011.
• Wilken S., Ghaly K., The Law of Waiver, Variation, and Estoppel. Third edition, Oxford University Press Inc., 2012.
• Zagynej Z.A., Germenevtyka kryminal’nogo zakonu Ukrai’ny [Hermeneutics of the criminal law of Ukraine], dys. dokt. juryd. nauk za spec.: 12.00.08, Kyi’v 2016.

Identifiers

DOI

10.15804/ksm20230202

Biblioteka Nauki

10489850