Preparation and imposition of punishment for the Commission of Criminal Offenses Prescribed by Articles 371–376 of the CC of Ukraine

• Authors: Vitalii Kostrytskyi

Abstracts

EN

The article deals with criminal law characteristics and imposition of punishment for offenses in the field of implementation and maintenance of ordinary activity of bodies of inquiry, pre-trial investigation, prosecutor’s office, and court. The research analyzes the fundamentals of establishing criminal liability for particular socially-dangerous acts. The tasks of the present publication encompass methodologically correct preparation of a judgment in cases of offenses against justice which would contain a response to asserted claims, satisfy parties to the case, and be skillfully drafted meeting relevant requirements.

Keywords

EN

maintenance of adequate activity of bodies of inquiry; pre-trial investigation; prosecutor’s office and court; judgment; imposition of punishment

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
• Journal: Reality of Politics
• Year: 2021
• Issue: 18
• Pages: 65-91

Dates

published

2021

Contributors

author

Vitalii Kostrytskyi

• Judge of Luhansk Court of Appeal

References

• Berzanyuk, Ya. (2021). Osnovni etapy pidhotovky motyvovanoho sudovoho rishennya: vymohy procesualnoho zakonu v svitli pologhenj konvencii pro zahyst prav lyudyny i osnovopologhnyh svobod [The main stages of preparation of a reasoned court decision: the requirements of procedural law in the light of the provisions of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms]. Retrieved from: http://surl.li/akxad.
• Berzanyuk, Ya. (2019). Ponyattya ta kryterii motyvovanosti sudovoho rishennya yak odniyei z harantij dotrymannya sudamy pryncypu verhovenstva prava [The concept and criteria of motivation of a court decision as one of the guarantees of observance by courts of the principle of the rule of law]. Retrieved from: http://surl.li/akxal.
• Judgment in the case of Seryavin and Others v. Ukraine (application No. 4909/04). Retrieved from: http://surl.li/akxah.
• Konstytuciya Ukrainy: Zakon Ukrainy vid 28.06.1996 № 254к/96-ВР ВР [The Constitution of Ukraine: Law of Ukraine on Juny 28, 1996, No. 254к/96-ВР]. Retrieved from: http://surl.li/gdyl; Pro sudoustrij i status suddiv [Law of Ukraine on Juny 02, 2016, No. 1402-VIII].
• Kostryts’kyj, V.V. (2018). Kryminal’no-pravova kharakterystyka pidkupu vyborcya abo uchasnyka referendumu [Criminal-legal characteristics of bribery of a voter or referendum participant]: dys. kand. yuryd. nauk za spets.: 12.00.08. Severodonets’k.
• Kryminal’no-processual’nyj kodeks Ukrainy: Naukovo-praktychnyj komentar [The Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine: Scientific and Practical Commentary]. Charkiv: Odissey.
• Kryminal’nyj processual’nyj kodeks Ukrainy: Zakon Ukrainy vid (13.04.2012). No. 4651VI [The Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine: Law of Ukraine on April 13, 2012 № 4651-VI]. Retrieved from: http://surl.li/navm.
• Kujbida, R., Syroyid, O. (2013). Posibnyk iz napysannya sudovyh rishen’ [Guide to writing court decisions]. Kyi’v: «Dream Art». С. 52 (224 с).
• Marszałek-Kawa, J., Plecka, D. (eds.). (2019). Dictionary of Political Knowledge. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek.
• Marchenko, A.A. Zastosuvannya elementiv yurydychnoi tehniky pry pidhotovzi sudovoho rishennya [Application of elements of legal technique in the preparation of a court decision]. Retrieved from: http://surl.li/akxan.
• Moldovan, A.V. (2013). Kryminal’nyj proces Ukrainy [Criminal proceedings of Ukraine]: navch. posib. / A. V. Moldovan, S. M. Mel’nyk. Kyi’v: Zentr uchbovoi literatury.
• Nastil’na knyha professiynoho suddi (kryminal’ne provadghennya) (2010) [Professional judge’s desk book (criminal proceedings)] / N.O. Marchuk, V.V. Kas’ko, R.O. Kujbida, M.I. Havronyuk ta in. / za red. N.O. Marchuk. Kyi’v: «Art-Disign».
• Popelyushko, V.O. (2006). Sudovyj rozhlyad kryminal’noi spravy [Criminal proceedings]. Navchal’nyj posibnyk. Kyi’v: Kondor.
• Posibnyk pomichnyka suddi zahal’noho sudu (2010). [Manual of the Assistant Judge of the General Court]. Kyi’v, С. 234 (509 с.).
• Pys’mens’kyj, Ye.O. (2008). Instytut sudymosti v kryminalnomu pravi Ukrainy [Institute of criminal record in criminal law of Ukraine]: monohrafia. Luhansk.
• Tertyshnyk V.M. (2017). Kryminalnyj proces [Criminal proceedings]: pidruchnyk. 7-e vyd., dopovn. i pererob. Kyi’v: Alerta.
• Vysnovok, N 11 (2008). Konsul’tatyvnoi rady yevropejs’kyh suddiv do uvahy Komitetu ministriv Rady Yevropy pro yakist’ sudovyh rishen’ [Opinion No. 11 (2008) of the Consultative Council of European Judges to the attention of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on the quality of judicial decisions]. Retrieved from: http://surl.li/akxaj.
• Vyrok Boryspil’s’koho mis’krayonnoho sudu Kyivs’koi oblasti vid 17 travnya 2019 r. Sprava No. 359/2533/19. [Judgment of the Boryspil City District Court of the Kyiv Region of May 17, 2019. Case No. 359/2533/19]. Retrieved from: http://surl.li/akxco.

Identifiers

DOI

10.15804/rop2021404

Biblioteka Nauki

1933773